Crazy stuff.Critics of the first experiment at the research facility at Cern in the Swiss Alps said that the long bunches of neutrinos used could introduce an error into the test, so the experiment was repeated with shorter bunches.
The findings were the same as the first experiment, with neutrinos sent through 730 kilometres of rock to a giant detector at the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy arriving 60 billionths of a second faster than light would over the same distance.
FTL particle experiment confirms results
FTL particle experiment confirms results
http://www.manilanews.net/story/2011340 ... -discovery
I love quake!
-
Don Carlos
- Posts: 17515
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
Yeah I read this...interesting for the world of physics
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
I wonder how long before it means anything to us plebs.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
Would be cool if they were actually creating those particles 60 billionths of a second in the past.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
we are too stoopid to figure it all out...and we will all die before we understand...
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
ur stoopid...
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
should give us better tv'sTransient wrote:I wonder how long before it means anything to us plebs.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
Means we'll have lower ping n00bTransient wrote:I wonder how long before it means anything to us plebs.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
- and we'll be able to play through rock without cables?mjrpes wrote:Means we'll have lower ping n00bTransient wrote:I wonder how long before it means anything to us plebs.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
So a sub-atomic particle of infinitely small mass was measured as faster than light speed through a non-vacuum. How is this news?
How about we pass an atom through a vacuum at a faster than light speed and report on that first.
Oh right, we're all idiots that don't really understand what Einstein said.
How about we pass an atom through a vacuum at a faster than light speed and report on that first.
Oh right, we're all idiots that don't really understand what Einstein said.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
But thank god we still have you, someone who does understand everything to the letter!
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
I'm not a sensationalist and didn't flunk physics like the idiots in the media. The followup article that nobody talks about:Eraser wrote:But thank god we still have you, someone who does understand everything to the letter!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15830844
The lack of a unifying theory in physics opens up doors to many possibilities. However, reporting on unverified results is retarded. If you put the same amount of effort from your shit comment into some research, you'd find that quantum theory touches on faster than light speeds and how it applies to different sub-atomic particles.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
The point I got from it is that the goal is to simply understand what is causing that result. Hyping it up as a disproving Einstein's theories is retarded, but it is still a very interesting puzzle to crack. My under-educated guess is that the speed of light isn't being surpassed, but there is some other quantum mechanical explanation. Or maybe it is being surpassed and it's just another incompatibility between quantum mechanics and relativity.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
k so the verdict is in:
Faster-than-light neutrino result reportedly a mistake caused by loose cable
http://arstechnica.com/science/news/201 ... ars?dskfaj
the scientific method triumphs once again
Faster-than-light neutrino result reportedly a mistake caused by loose cable
http://arstechnica.com/science/news/201 ... ars?dskfaj
the scientific method triumphs once again
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
well, technically, the verdict isn't in because they haven't yet tested the hypothesis; however a loose cable is a more plausible explanation than one that means re-writing the laws of physics
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
right, looks like they are also going through with the previous tests they had lined up.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
A loose cable? 
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
this is a particle accelerator we're talking about here, not your daddy's pickup truck. it's a complicated piece of machinery
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
thats neat ey
it reminds me that i miss stargate universe
it reminds me that i miss stargate universe
it is about time!
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
nu-uh it's a popcorn makerseremtan wrote:this is a particle accelerator we're talking about here, not your daddy's pickup truck. it's a complicated piece of machinery
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
a popcorn maker with 5,000,000,000,000 flavors to choose from.
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
yes it's a cover up...the truth would blow our minds!...seremtan wrote:well, technically, the verdict isn't in because they haven't yet tested the hypothesis; however a loose cable is a more plausible explanation than one that means re-writing the laws of physics
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
That's the difference between science and religion: scientists admit it when they're wrong.
-
Don Carlos
- Posts: 17515
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: FTL particle experiment confirms results
Make it happenMemphis wrote:there's a killer meme waiting to happen in there somewhereDon Carlos wrote:Yeah I read this...interesting for the world of physics