Anybody running XP 64bit yet?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
Cool Blue
Posts: 916
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:39 am

Anybody running XP 64bit yet?

Post by Cool Blue »

I'm getting a 64bit CPU in a couple of weeks, so I'm downloading the x64 edition as part of my MSDN subscription. Just wondering if I should expect shit dropping performance gains or what.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17513
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

negative, i cant see it making that much difference?
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

The other software you use have to be 64bit too.
Deathshroud
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm

Post by Deathshroud »

Supposedly 32-bit apps are supposed to run equally in the 64-bit edition. The only enhancement being, the ability to run 64-bit apps, and the increased memory limit.
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

only a moron would use 64 bit right now...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
User avatar
shaft
Posts: 12473
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by shaft »

fuck u...
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

I happen to believe that it is NOT a good idea to switch to 64 bit until EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF SOFTWARE ON YOUR COMPUTER runs in 64 bit....otherwise it's useless.
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

critical mass...
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:I happen to believe that it is NOT a good idea to switch to 64 bit until EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF SOFTWARE ON YOUR COMPUTER runs in 64 bit....otherwise it's useless.
but if no one switches then there is no market....
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Only very, VERY few operations will increase performance, even when all software is 64bit optimized.

Adding additional wheels to a car will enable it to carry more load (RAM) but they won't make it faster.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

I thought a lot of people here had AMD64s...
DiscoDave
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:33 pm

Post by DiscoDave »

It depends what kind of system you have at the moment, even in 32bit mode an athlon 64 3400+ is quite a lot faster than an XP3200+ for example. But if you have a good computer at the moment then no, there is not much point in going 64 bit right now.

But to answer the original question, there wont be much difference atall as (and has alrady been said) there are no/very few true 64 bit applications about.
booker
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2000 8:00 am

Post by booker »

there are a few games that are for the 64
As it stands, there's a small list of games that take advantage of the 64-bit environment. Chronicles of Riddick and Shadow Ops are two that are available now. Both Ubisoft and Epic Games had said they'd have XP 64-bit versions of Far Cry and UT2K4 available in the first quarter, but neither have been released yet. S.T.A.L.K.E.R. will ship optimized for 64-bit gaming. Both ATI and nVidia have 64-bit drivers available, but judging from Internet opinion, performance is a crapshoot.
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

What's the benefit to 64-bit besides greater precision and more capacity (such as RAM limits)? I cant see it speeding things up unless they use the extra decimal places in numbers to store more information, etc. but that would take intelligence to do, and many programmers out there just dont seem to have a clue...
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

fuck u...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

Canis wrote:What's the benefit to 64-bit besides greater precision and more capacity (such as RAM limits)? I cant see it speeding things up unless they use the extra decimal places in numbers to store more information, etc. but that would take intelligence to do, and many programmers out there just dont seem to have a clue...
You will be able to fetch a quad word from memory in one assembly language operation, IIRC. Currently 32-bit machines can fetch only a dword in one operation.
^misantropia^
Posts: 4022
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:24 pm

Post by ^misantropia^ »

Copying memory, which is a thing games tend to do often, ought to be twice as fast with 64-bits processors (assuming the CPU can process those instructions as fast as their 32-bit counterparts).

EDIT: what fender said :)
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

i allready have run it, infact i got the CD sitting beside me.

i installed it when i first pieced my 64-bit system togeather.. And in the period of 3 hours, it crashed ~8 times, as well as the 32-bit/64-bit applecations where quite annoying, say to go to Newgrounds ( for instant ) it will prompt and say that you are not running a valid 32-bit blah blah blah, same with windows update etc..

when it gets smoothened out i will be happy, but for now, i will stilc with 32-bit windows untill 64 is more mainstream.
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

One (or more) of the tech sites ran a comparison of 32bit Windows + 32bit apps, 64bit Windows + 32bit apps, 64bit Windows + 64 bit apps.

I believe that 32+32 was as fast or faster in just about every test.

Plus, most hardware besides video cards doesn't have 64 bit drivers yet. Got a soundcard? Probably need to ditch that. Got a firewire/usb card? Probably have to ditch that too.

Right now, it's totally pointless and you will either lose hardware or performance...or both.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Just get a G5 fools
Post Reply