Looking for a new LCD TV
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
not the caseYourGrandpa wrote:Well if you've bought a shit Plasma and have an awesome LCD, that could explain your current situation.
the plasma in question was voted TV of the year in a few mags
And its up against this:

LG 32LX2R
Hardly the best LCD in the market, though not the worst

Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
This is my one.
http://www.trustedreviews.com/tvs/revie ... -Plasma/p1
It's all down to personal preference I guess, but I am well happy with it and it's much better for films and TV then the LG LCD was.
Then again, it's more money than the LCD was, so an equivalent priced LCD would be just as good if not better, I suppose.
Either way, HD is the nuts.
http://www.trustedreviews.com/tvs/revie ... -Plasma/p1
It's all down to personal preference I guess, but I am well happy with it and it's much better for films and TV then the LG LCD was.
Then again, it's more money than the LCD was, so an equivalent priced LCD would be just as good if not better, I suppose.
Either way, HD is the nuts.
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
that looks mediocre at bestDon Carlos wrote:My mistake, its a HITACHI 42PD7200
https://www.displaytek.co.uk/shop/produ ... cts_id=599
Teevee Of the Year or whatever the fuck it won doesnt mean its the best out there, its usually 'best bang for your buck' kinda deal, ease of use, number of connectors. picture quality is just one of the factors they average out with
Last edited by MKJ on Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
nail - head.Pauly wrote:This is my one.
http://www.trustedreviews.com/tvs/revie ... -Plasma/p1
It's all down to personal preference I guess, but I am well happy with it and it's much better for films and TV then the LG LCD was.
Then again, it's more money than the LCD was, so an equivalent priced LCD would be just as good if not better, I suppose.
Either way, HD is the nuts.
it's my preference to buy a LCD because ALL the plasmas i've seen don't stand up to a LCD of the same price
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
In the US, Plasmas are considerably cheaper than LCDs. So you can get more bang for your buck, with as good or better picture quality from a Plasma. Besides, I would only be watching TV/Movies on it anway, so gaming use wouldn't matter.
Later this year I plan to replace my 65" projection TV with another big TV. I'd rather have a 60" Plasma than a 50" LCD, probably for less $$$ as well.
Later this year I plan to replace my 65" projection TV with another big TV. I'd rather have a 60" Plasma than a 50" LCD, probably for less $$$ as well.
Gotcha. Well it's enough to make me shy away from plasma, if I'm going to be dropping that much cash on one.Pauly wrote:I read that, and it is something to consider when buyng one. LCD's are 'safer' but so far I have had no issues or problems with Plasma. Apart than tripping over my jaw when it hits the floor LOL.R00k wrote:Weren't plasmas found to be more susceptible to screen burn-in after a while?