Need For Speed Carbon Next Gen shots
Need For Speed Carbon Next Gen shots
Ingame... Blah, I thought Full Auto looked bad for a 360 game ,this thing just looks even worse. When will EA stop making games for PS2 and porting them to everything else...
http://uk.media.ps3.ign.com/media/826/8 ... mgs_1.html
http://uk.media.ps3.ign.com/media/826/8 ... mgs_1.html
All of it? The road texture must be using a 256x256 texture spread out over half the track its that bad...R00k wrote:Er, which part is it that looks bad?
Graphics dont make the game sure, but in Need For Speeds case, the games been shite ever since the last PSOne game, so gameplay is none existent in these things.
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Those shots are next gen mate. i.e. 360 and PS3 shots. IGN has a bit preview of it.bitWISE wrote:Er, that looks way better than the previous NFS games...
I mean, have you played NFSU2 on a PS2?
If they were PS2 shots i would be saying "ok, dont like the style as such, but for a PS2 game it looks good".
- FragaGeddon
- Posts: 3229
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2000 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
WTF are you talking about... NFS:MW while a buch of ricer shit, wasent a BAD game.. O_oo'dium wrote:Really? Are you sitting at your moms right now with beer next to you, ready to go out with your mates in a bit to just be a general cuntbag on the streets for no reason?Nightshade wrote:I thought NFS:MW was a blast.
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.
I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
A 360 and a PS3 do not have 512mb of video memory or 2gigs of ram to throw around to store really high resolution textures, being the graphics wiz that you are odium I thought you would've thought about that. You can't expect every console game to have high resolution textures, it just won't happen for quite some time. If this was a PC Only title, then I'd say sure, this doesn't look that fantastic, but it doesn't look really shite 
On a side note, I too did enjoy most wanted, and I quite look forward to getting this too. Be nice if it came out on the wii as well
Z

On a side note, I too did enjoy most wanted, and I quite look forward to getting this too. Be nice if it came out on the wii as well

Z
Last edited by Zombie13 on Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Actually, memory on consoles plays a different way compared to memory on a PC.Zombie13 wrote:A 360 and a PS3 do not have 512mb of video memory or 2gigs of ram to throw around to store really high resolution textures, being the graphics wiz that you are odium I thought you would've thought about that. You can't expect every console game to have high resolution textures, it just won't happen for quite some time. If this was a PC Only title, then I'd say sure, this doesn't look that fantastic, but it doesn't look really shite
On a side note, I too did enjoy most wanted, and I quite look forward to getting this too. Be nice if it came out on the wii as well
Z
Look at Doom 3 on the xbox. 64meg of ram. Do you REALLY think that a PC with the spec of an xbox could handle that game?
Developing for a single platform can have a lot of GOOD results.
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Your right, it looks good. For a PS2 game.Nightshade wrote:You guys are ridiculous. Ok, I can see complaining about some excess motion blur, but COME ON, the game looks fine.
But for a 7 cored 3.2ghz CPU with a 512meg super faster (almost as fast as an SLI rig) GPU and 512meg of memory, i cant see how it could ever look this BAD.
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am