edit: Do U know if it's a possible way to save on gas?...
-
Guest
edit: Do U know if it's a possible way to save on gas?...
Any of you are into mechanic?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?
After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?
After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
Last edited by Guest on Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Big Kahuna Burger
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm
-
Guest
Re: You know about all the gas saver kits for car?
Have you ever warmed up gasoline pete?pete wrote:Any of you are into mechanic?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?
After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
-
Guest
Re: You know about all the gas saver kits for car?
I know were you want to get to.Kracus wrote:Have you ever warmed up gasoline pete?pete wrote:Any of you are into mechanic?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?
After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
I wrote warm it, not boiling it.
-
Guest
Oh I don't think boiling gasoline is really something that's gonna happen anyway. Well you would need to figure a few things out pete.
First, CAN you warm up gas?
Second, if you CAN how much does the volume change?
Third If you take the same ammount at different temperatures is there any increase in performance?
Fourth would it be cost effective?
There's a start for ya. Make sure to give me credit if you make it big.
First, CAN you warm up gas?
Second, if you CAN how much does the volume change?
Third If you take the same ammount at different temperatures is there any increase in performance?
Fourth would it be cost effective?
There's a start for ya. Make sure to give me credit if you make it big.
-
Guest
That's why I asked the Pros in that field if it is feasible.Kracus wrote:Oh I don't think boiling gasoline is really something that's gonna happen anyway. Well you would need to figure a few things out pete.
First, CAN you warm up gas?
Second, if you CAN how much does the volume change?
Third If you take the same ammount at different temperatures is there any increase in performance?
Fourth would it be cost effective?
There's a start for ya. Make sure to give me credit if you make it big.
I can't answer to these questions since they where what I was asking for in the first place. Can't answer to myself.
-
Guest
-
Guest
-
Guest
sureKracus wrote:Well I guess that's something else you'll need to figure out but at least you're on the right track, lemme know how you make out!
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
-
Guest
Don't know but Whiskey7 posted that sitetnf wrote:there was a long thread about the carnot cycle long ago...if i remember correctly.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... s/home.htm That's were I found it and it made me think about that gas saving thing idea.
What do you think about it though? I am pretty sure you know more than me in that area, well, I'm sure.
And BTW how is it tonight? You are still a mod in here even though you ''restart'' teaching class.
-
Guest
Last night I was in bed, 3AM thinking about my gas saving thing idea and I thought...Since the vapor of gas are much more ''volatile'' inflammable
than the liquid gas itself, why not use only the vapor of the gas instead of the whole liquid form ( not formaldehyde that is ).
And after a research on the subject, I found this http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/Sha ... pher.shtml
What do you think?
than the liquid gas itself, why not use only the vapor of the gas instead of the whole liquid form ( not formaldehyde that is ).
And after a research on the subject, I found this http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/Sha ... pher.shtml
What do you think?
-
Guest
Since I didn't get any reply from this one, I just wanted to repost it.pete wrote:Last night I was in bed, 3AM thinking about my gas saving thing idea and I thought...Since the vapor of gas are much more ''volatile'' inflammable
than the liquid gas itself, why not use only the vapor of the gas instead of the whole liquid form ( not formaldehyde that is ).
And after a research on the subject, I found this http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/Sha ... pher.shtml
What do you think?
So, really, what do you thinK?
The severely retard old man
The whole process that powers a gas engine is that the gas expands when it ignites, thereby causing the engine to turn over. If you expand the gasoline before you inject it, less will enter the cylinder, which will lead to less power to turn the engine over.
But even beyond that, gas isn't directly injected into the cylinders to begin with. It is mixed with air first, so it is already a thin mist when it reaches the cylinder. AFAIK, you can't really expand it much more than it already is by the time it gets to the combustion chamber/cylinder.
But even beyond that, gas isn't directly injected into the cylinders to begin with. It is mixed with air first, so it is already a thin mist when it reaches the cylinder. AFAIK, you can't really expand it much more than it already is by the time it gets to the combustion chamber/cylinder.
-
Guest
That's true with the common engine but what if we build one that only need the vapors of gas almost without the air mixture, since gas vapor are more volatile than the liquid gas itself?R00k wrote:The whole process that powers a gas engine is that the gas expands when it ignites, thereby causing the engine to turn over. If you expand the gasoline before you inject it, less will enter the cylinder, which will lead to less power to turn the engine over.
But even beyond that, gas isn't directly injected into the cylinders to begin with. It is mixed with air first, so it is already a thin mist when it reaches the cylinder. AFAIK, you can't really expand it much more than it already is by the time it gets to the combustion chamber/cylinder.
-
Guest
I thought of an idea the other day for a jet powered engine.
The idea is that instead of pistons that move because of an explosion the pistons actualy move because it's actualy a minijet that shoots off when it's supposed to in short bursts. I just wonder what's more powerful, an explosion or the force of a small jet in a confined area?
The idea is that instead of pistons that move because of an explosion the pistons actualy move because it's actualy a minijet that shoots off when it's supposed to in short bursts. I just wonder what's more powerful, an explosion or the force of a small jet in a confined area?