edit: Do U know if it's a possible way to save on gas?...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Guest

edit: Do U know if it's a possible way to save on gas?...

Post by Guest »

Any of you are into mechanic?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?

After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
Last edited by Guest on Sat Nov 12, 2005 2:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

no
no
no

not sure
idk
not really, no.
[url=http://www.thejidf.org/1990/02/support-jidf.html][img]http://i.imgur.com/D114M.png[/img][/url]
Guest

Re: You know about all the gas saver kits for car?

Post by Guest »

pete wrote:Any of you are into mechanic?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?

After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
Have you ever warmed up gasoline pete?
Guest

Re: You know about all the gas saver kits for car?

Post by Guest »

Kracus wrote:
pete wrote:Any of you are into mechanic?
Or gas industries R&D?
Physician?

After looking, studying the Carnot Cycle.
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... carnot.htm
It made me think about…What would be the effect of warming the gas before it is injected onto the pistons chamber? Warming it would give it more volume thus we would need less gas for the same action? May be even facilitate the spark.
Any idea if this is plausible?
Have you ever warmed up gasoline pete?
I know were you want to get to.
I wrote warm it, not boiling it.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Oh I don't think boiling gasoline is really something that's gonna happen anyway. Well you would need to figure a few things out pete.

First, CAN you warm up gas?

Second, if you CAN how much does the volume change?

Third If you take the same ammount at different temperatures is there any increase in performance?

Fourth would it be cost effective?

There's a start for ya. Make sure to give me credit if you make it big.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Kracus wrote:Oh I don't think boiling gasoline is really something that's gonna happen anyway. Well you would need to figure a few things out pete.

First, CAN you warm up gas?

Second, if you CAN how much does the volume change?

Third If you take the same ammount at different temperatures is there any increase in performance?

Fourth would it be cost effective?

There's a start for ya. Make sure to give me credit if you make it big.
That's why I asked the Pros in that field if it is feasible.
I can't answer to these questions since they where what I was asking for in the first place. Can't answer to myself.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Why can't you? I just gave you the steps to awnser your own question do you think we go around warming up our gas? :dork:
Guest

Post by Guest »

Kracus wrote:Why can't you? I just gave you the steps to awnser your own question do you think we go around warming up our gas? :dork:
I'm not Pratt & Whitney with all the logistics, testing chambers and all.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Well I guess that's something else you'll need to figure out but at least you're on the right track, lemme know how you make out!
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Kracus wrote:Well I guess that's something else you'll need to figure out but at least you're on the right track, lemme know how you make out!
sure
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Someone needs to take Thermodynamics.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Foo wrote:
Kracus wrote:Well I guess that's something else you'll need to figure out but at least you're on the right track, lemme know how you make out!
sure
Shhhhh he's gonna blow himself up!
User avatar
PhoeniX
Posts: 4067
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2000 7:00 am

Post by PhoeniX »

Alternatively don't buy an American gas-guzzler.

And if you want to save the most money buy a Diesel, or convert your petrol car to LPG, but I don't know how available both of those are there.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

there was a long thread about the carnot cycle long ago...if i remember correctly.
Guest

Post by Guest »

tnf wrote:there was a long thread about the carnot cycle long ago...if i remember correctly.
Don't know but Whiskey7 posted that site
http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virgi ... s/home.htm That's were I found it and it made me think about that gas saving thing idea.
What do you think about it though? I am pretty sure you know more than me in that area, well, I'm sure.
And BTW how is it tonight? You are still a mod in here even though you ''restart'' teaching class.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Last night I was in bed, 3AM thinking about my gas saving thing idea and I thought...Since the vapor of gas are much more ''volatile'' inflammable
than the liquid gas itself, why not use only the vapor of the gas instead of the whole liquid form ( not formaldehyde that is ).
And after a research on the subject, I found this http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/Sha ... pher.shtml
What do you think?
Guest

Post by Guest »

pete wrote:Last night I was in bed, 3AM thinking about my gas saving thing idea and I thought...Since the vapor of gas are much more ''volatile'' inflammable
than the liquid gas itself, why not use only the vapor of the gas instead of the whole liquid form ( not formaldehyde that is ).
And after a research on the subject, I found this http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/Sha ... pher.shtml
What do you think?
Since I didn't get any reply from this one, I just wanted to repost it.
So, really, what do you thinK?

The severely retard old man
Guest

Post by Guest »

I think you smelled too many fumes.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Kracus wrote:I think you smelled too many fumes.

Are you doing projection now?
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

The whole process that powers a gas engine is that the gas expands when it ignites, thereby causing the engine to turn over. If you expand the gasoline before you inject it, less will enter the cylinder, which will lead to less power to turn the engine over.

But even beyond that, gas isn't directly injected into the cylinders to begin with. It is mixed with air first, so it is already a thin mist when it reaches the cylinder. AFAIK, you can't really expand it much more than it already is by the time it gets to the combustion chamber/cylinder.
Guest

Post by Guest »

R00k wrote:The whole process that powers a gas engine is that the gas expands when it ignites, thereby causing the engine to turn over. If you expand the gasoline before you inject it, less will enter the cylinder, which will lead to less power to turn the engine over.

But even beyond that, gas isn't directly injected into the cylinders to begin with. It is mixed with air first, so it is already a thin mist when it reaches the cylinder. AFAIK, you can't really expand it much more than it already is by the time it gets to the combustion chamber/cylinder.
That's true with the common engine but what if we build one that only need the vapors of gas almost without the air mixture, since gas vapor are more volatile than the liquid gas itself?
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

Pete, what really needs to be done with combustion engines is an increase in efficiency of the transfer of energy. I don't thnk that the delivery of the fuel is an issue. What goes on afterwards is where the true problem lies.
Canidae
Posts: 2351
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:29 am

Post by Canidae »

rotary engine... :!:
[img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/popehat.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.subliminaldissonance.com/images/smilies/nothing.jpg[/img]
Guest

Post by Guest »

I thought of an idea the other day for a jet powered engine.

The idea is that instead of pistons that move because of an explosion the pistons actualy move because it's actualy a minijet that shoots off when it's supposed to in short bursts. I just wonder what's more powerful, an explosion or the force of a small jet in a confined area?
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

Canidae wrote:rotary engine... :!:
I can't understand why they don't use this technology more often. You'd think Mazda would use it in all their cars. Surely it can't cost that much more to build and if it is becomes more common it wont cost much to repair either.
Post Reply