Dude...the dual 2.5 is still bleeding edge. It's right up there with the dual 2.7 which is just under the quad. I own a dual 2.5, and I'm going to run it through the ground before upgrading. Going to a quad would be great, but its by no means worth the money.Geebs wrote:Oh well, my dual 2.5 was bleeding edge for about 6 months. Can't complain really, wasn't going to upgrade until the intel powermacs are out. Even then, the thought of migrating all my audio stuff across gives me hives....
Want a quad processor machine?
Here are some preliminary benchmarks: http://media.99mac.se/g5_dualcore/
-
SplishSplash
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
lol.. I was just going to spec you out a dual core Opteron box. The 2.2 GHz is over 1000/each so we're already starting at $2150. Once you price it out completely, it costs about the same for the same hardware as the powermac. I just remembered that I forgot to toss in a video card and OS tooSplishSplash wrote:Or you could always get a dual opteron mainboard and two dual-core opterons.
There are even dual opteron boards that support SLI
Re: Want a quad processor machine?
No thanks.Canis wrote:Want a quad processor machine?
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Is that mactop as thin as it seems to look in that pic?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]

