r u religious?

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Tsakali_
Posts: 3778
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:46 pm

Post by Tsakali_ »

wake me up when this thread is over
Guest

Post by Guest »

Kaziganthe wrote:Kracus, you're a dumb piece of trash, ok? All you're doing is trying to back up your point of view by saying "oh, it's bogus, the bible can be disproven, gimme proof why you believe in god... blah blah" And then you just rant some more about how religion is wrong, and how people are idiots who believe in it. All you're doing is saying that they're wrong, giving no proof whatsoever that they're wrong, and then babbling on about random scientific shit. Guess what? That makes you as blinded and stupid and sheeplike and whatever other adjective you feel like using to describe the religious zealots you hate, you dumb, annoying, worthless faggot. Go on and repeat yourself again and call me a moron and a religious sheep or something, and then have a good cry on how it's all bogus like you know what you're talking about. :boohoo:
Why don't you actualy read what I posted?

I asked torm a simple question he still hasn't awnsered. It's a simple question designed to make you think. I don't see how that's calling someone an idiot or any of the shit you post. Sure I might insult some people but it's because they insulted me to begin with faggot. Look at my responses to chunk. Did I call him stupid? No I had a discussion with him and explained my point of view. At least he actualy progressed instead of what torm comes up with. Blame me if it makes you feel better but I'm not the one here that's acting like a fucking child. I've tried to have a discussion here you guys are the ones that either can't grasp what I'm talking about or just refuse to because you can't awnser. and by you guys I'm talking about those who I'm talking to in this thread.
Guest

Post by Guest »

losCHUNK wrote:'you' feel that religion is untrue
Sure. I feel religion is untrue the same way I feel santa clause is untrue. I just don't understand how a person can feel one way about an imaginary being and another way about another one. Don't you find that puzzling?
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dr_Watson »

organized religion is such a paradoxical farse.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Dr_Watson wrote:organized religion is such a preternatural fart.
Guest

Post by Guest »

lol when I think about it I could see religion being created by a bunch of potheads. :p
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

You see everything in terms of pot.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Sometimes...
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dr_Watson »

Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
thats the worst of them all.
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
Kills On Site
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Kills On Site »

Dr_Watson wrote:
Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
thats the worst of them all.
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
I perfer to not make a decision on something which I cannot be informed apon, and I don't want be a bigot of any side
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36019
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

Kaziganthe wrote:Kracus, you're a dumb piece of trash, ok? All you're doing is trying to back up your point of view by saying "oh, it's bogus, the bible can be disproven, gimme proof why you believe in god... blah blah" And then you just rant some more about how religion is wrong, and how people are idiots who believe in it. All you're doing is saying that they're wrong, giving no proof whatsoever that they're wrong, and then babbling on about random scientific shit. Guess what? That makes you as blinded and stupid and sheeplike and whatever other adjective you feel like using to describe the religious zealots you hate, you dumb, annoying, worthless faggot. Go on and repeat yourself again and call me a moron and a religious sheep or something, and then have a good cry on how it's all bogus like you know what you're talking about. :boohoo:
:olo:

man, save *some* toys to throw out of the pram *later*, dude :p
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36019
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

Kills On Site wrote:
Dr_Watson wrote:
Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
thats the worst of them all.
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
I perfer to not make a decision on something which I cannot be informed apon, and I don't want be a bigot of any side
i think it requires a leap of faith rather than rock hard erect quivering evidence, actually

see what i did there?
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

Hannibal wrote:I think I'm agreeable Jules but could you clarify a bit?
crap - forgot about this thread completely. (btw han the comment I made wasn't directed at you, it was just my 2 random cents)

What I meant was that the very fitting of people into these three categories constrains our notions of spirituality.

Perhaps foucault would say the same thing of our construction of sexuality. Perhaps not - never read him, just heard a lecture or two.
Last edited by [xeno]Julios on Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Hannibal »

Dr_Watson wrote:
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
Why should one be forced to take a 'stand' on an existence claim that is not open to traditional methods of empirical investigation?
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Kracus wrote:
losCHUNK wrote:'you' feel that religion is untrue
Sure. I feel religion is untrue the same way I feel santa clause is untrue. I just don't understand how a person can feel one way about an imaginary being and another way about another one. Don't you find that puzzling?
Your occasional moments of clarity are excellent :icon14:
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36019
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

santa claus is untrue? oh man....
Dek
Posts: 1010
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 5:53 pm

Post by Dek »

santa was propelled to where he is by Coca Cola..
All this isn't to say that Coca-Cola didn't have anything to do with cementing that image of Santa Claus in the public consciousness. The Santa image may have been standardized before Coca-Cola adopted it for their advertisements, but Coca-Cola had a great deal to do with establishing Santa Claus as a ubiquitous Christmas figure in America at a time when the holiday was still making the transition from a religious observance to a largely secular and highly commercial celebration. In an era before color television (or commercial television of any kind), color films, and the widespread use of color in newspapers, it was Coca-Cola's magazine advertisements, billboards, and point-of-sale store displays that exposed nearly everyone in America to the modern Santa Claus image. Coca-Cola certainly helped make Santa Claus one of the most popular men in America, but they didn't invent him.
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/astr0chimp][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/astr0chimp.jpg[/img][/url]
::[url=http://www.astrochimp.net]astrochimp dot net[/url]::
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Only in America Dek, and we all know that place doesn't really matter.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

more on santa, coca cola, caffeine, drugs, here:

http://www.gladwell.com/2001/2001_07_30_a_java.htm

If you haven't already read this, do yourself a favour and do so :)
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

You realise Santa is barely mentioned in the first paragraph and then that's it, right?
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

the book said :lol:
it is about time!
Tormentius
Posts: 4108
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Tormentius »

bork[e] wrote:
I'm not trying to be a smart ass, start anything ect, but neither do you. :icon22:
I never said that I did. If you read my posts I simply said that neither side had irrefutable evidence; not that my beliefs are the only right way. In fact, I specifically said that there is a possibility my belief could be wrong.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

I don't care what this thread's about, I love seeing Kracus get his inter-ass handed to him. :olo:
Post Reply