r u religious?
-
Guest
Why don't you actualy read what I posted?Kaziganthe wrote:Kracus, you're a dumb piece of trash, ok? All you're doing is trying to back up your point of view by saying "oh, it's bogus, the bible can be disproven, gimme proof why you believe in god... blah blah" And then you just rant some more about how religion is wrong, and how people are idiots who believe in it. All you're doing is saying that they're wrong, giving no proof whatsoever that they're wrong, and then babbling on about random scientific shit. Guess what? That makes you as blinded and stupid and sheeplike and whatever other adjective you feel like using to describe the religious zealots you hate, you dumb, annoying, worthless faggot. Go on and repeat yourself again and call me a moron and a religious sheep or something, and then have a good cry on how it's all bogus like you know what you're talking about. :boohoo:
I asked torm a simple question he still hasn't awnsered. It's a simple question designed to make you think. I don't see how that's calling someone an idiot or any of the shit you post. Sure I might insult some people but it's because they insulted me to begin with faggot. Look at my responses to chunk. Did I call him stupid? No I had a discussion with him and explained my point of view. At least he actualy progressed instead of what torm comes up with. Blame me if it makes you feel better but I'm not the one here that's acting like a fucking child. I've tried to have a discussion here you guys are the ones that either can't grasp what I'm talking about or just refuse to because you can't awnser. and by you guys I'm talking about those who I'm talking to in this thread.
-
Guest
-
Kills On Site
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am
-
Kills On Site
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 7:00 am
I perfer to not make a decision on something which I cannot be informed apon, and I don't want be a bigot of any sideDr_Watson wrote:thats the worst of them all.Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
[size=92][color=#0000FF]Hugh Hefner for President[/color][/size]
Kaziganthe wrote:Kracus, you're a dumb piece of trash, ok? All you're doing is trying to back up your point of view by saying "oh, it's bogus, the bible can be disproven, gimme proof why you believe in god... blah blah" And then you just rant some more about how religion is wrong, and how people are idiots who believe in it. All you're doing is saying that they're wrong, giving no proof whatsoever that they're wrong, and then babbling on about random scientific shit. Guess what? That makes you as blinded and stupid and sheeplike and whatever other adjective you feel like using to describe the religious zealots you hate, you dumb, annoying, worthless faggot. Go on and repeat yourself again and call me a moron and a religious sheep or something, and then have a good cry on how it's all bogus like you know what you're talking about. :boohoo:
man, save *some* toys to throw out of the pram *later*, dude
i think it requires a leap of faith rather than rock hard erect quivering evidence, actuallyKills On Site wrote:I perfer to not make a decision on something which I cannot be informed apon, and I don't want be a bigot of any sideDr_Watson wrote:thats the worst of them all.Kills On Site wrote:Agnostic, bitches. Ha, take that. Don't know, don't care
take a stand either way, show some backbone you lazy, no ambition, little bitch.
see what i did there?
-
[xeno]Julios
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
crap - forgot about this thread completely. (btw han the comment I made wasn't directed at you, it was just my 2 random cents)Hannibal wrote:I think I'm agreeable Jules but could you clarify a bit?
What I meant was that the very fitting of people into these three categories constrains our notions of spirituality.
Perhaps foucault would say the same thing of our construction of sexuality. Perhaps not - never read him, just heard a lecture or two.
Last edited by [xeno]Julios on Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Your occasional moments of clarity are excellent :icon14:Kracus wrote:Sure. I feel religion is untrue the same way I feel santa clause is untrue. I just don't understand how a person can feel one way about an imaginary being and another way about another one. Don't you find that puzzling?losCHUNK wrote:'you' feel that religion is untrue
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
― Terry A. Davis
santa was propelled to where he is by Coca Cola..
All this isn't to say that Coca-Cola didn't have anything to do with cementing that image of Santa Claus in the public consciousness. The Santa image may have been standardized before Coca-Cola adopted it for their advertisements, but Coca-Cola had a great deal to do with establishing Santa Claus as a ubiquitous Christmas figure in America at a time when the holiday was still making the transition from a religious observance to a largely secular and highly commercial celebration. In an era before color television (or commercial television of any kind), color films, and the widespread use of color in newspapers, it was Coca-Cola's magazine advertisements, billboards, and point-of-sale store displays that exposed nearly everyone in America to the modern Santa Claus image. Coca-Cola certainly helped make Santa Claus one of the most popular men in America, but they didn't invent him.
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/astr0chimp][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/astr0chimp.jpg[/img][/url]
::[url=http://www.astrochimp.net]astrochimp dot net[/url]::
::[url=http://www.astrochimp.net]astrochimp dot net[/url]::
-
[xeno]Julios
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
more on santa, coca cola, caffeine, drugs, here:
http://www.gladwell.com/2001/2001_07_30_a_java.htm
If you haven't already read this, do yourself a favour and do so
http://www.gladwell.com/2001/2001_07_30_a_java.htm
If you haven't already read this, do yourself a favour and do so
-
Tormentius
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
I never said that I did. If you read my posts I simply said that neither side had irrefutable evidence; not that my beliefs are the only right way. In fact, I specifically said that there is a possibility my belief could be wrong.bork[e] wrote:
I'm not trying to be a smart ass, start anything ect, but neither do you. :icon22:
-
Nightshade
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am