http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Boston,MA ... &t=h&hl=en
Get two for the price of one
New Google maps feature
-
Underpants?
- Posts: 4755
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am
It's not the same system at all.
It uses scaled down versions of the images GoogleEarth uses, and they're all stamped with an annoying watermark. Also, it loads incredibly slowly, and the map/road feature is the slowest on the planet.
GoogleEarth's roads are nearly instantaneous. The only difference between the two are that GoogleMaps now shows the direction of traffic... A feature only useful if there is such a thing as a one way interstate highway. :lol:
It uses scaled down versions of the images GoogleEarth uses, and they're all stamped with an annoying watermark. Also, it loads incredibly slowly, and the map/road feature is the slowest on the planet.
GoogleEarth's roads are nearly instantaneous. The only difference between the two are that GoogleMaps now shows the direction of traffic... A feature only useful if there is such a thing as a one way interstate highway. :lol:
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
huh?rep wrote:The only difference between the two are that GoogleMaps now shows the direction of traffic... A feature only useful if there is such a thing as a one way interstate highway. :lol:
and rep, it's because i'm not willing to install googleEarth, because i probably can't run it, i don't have heaps of free space, and it's way too much time. occasionally checking out googleMaps is alright, it takes a few seconds of my time.
20MB???
I'm sure you can run it.
Edit: By the way, the moon is going to be added soon. It'll feature a proper orbit, phases, and events such as an eclipse which would also display an overlay on Earth where the viewing spots (shadows) should fall.
I'm sure you can run it.
Edit: By the way, the moon is going to be added soon. It'll feature a proper orbit, phases, and events such as an eclipse which would also display an overlay on Earth where the viewing spots (shadows) should fall.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
-
Guest
The only building you can actually see with the damn satellite in Montreal: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=montreal, ... &t=h&hl=en
wow..I actaully found my house :icon28:
Gonna use this at work :icon14:
Gonna use this at work :icon14:
[b][url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/redandjonny/]My Flickr page[/url][/b]
[color=#FFBFFF]A lot of people would say it's a bad idea, on your first day out of prison, to go right back to stalking the tranny hooker that knocked out five of your teeth. But that's how I roll..[/color]
[color=#FFBFFF]A lot of people would say it's a bad idea, on your first day out of prison, to go right back to stalking the tranny hooker that knocked out five of your teeth. But that's how I roll..[/color]
-
Guest
who really gives a fuck ?rep wrote:It's not the same system at all.
It uses scaled down versions of the images GoogleEarth uses, and they're all stamped with an annoying watermark. Also, it loads incredibly slowly, and the map/road feature is the slowest on the planet.
GoogleEarth's roads are nearly instantaneous. The only difference between the two are that GoogleMaps now shows the direction of traffic... A feature only useful if there is such a thing as a one way interstate highway. :lol:
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
-
Big Kahuna Burger
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm
