edit: actually cant remember if you have hair or not o_0
anyway i wouldnt say im vain, just dont like looking like a twat, i respect myself to much for that

Oh thats right, only sissies care about their appearance.Foo wrote::icon19:mik0rs wrote:Great fucking logic. I don't wear a bullet proof vest and I've never died of shotgun wounds either, not once.SOAPboy wrote:Never wore a helmet.. Never busted my head either..
So you cite 'messing up your hair' as a reason not to wear a helmet, then state that people who wear helmets are sissies?bitWISE wrote:I wouldn't for a few reasons: look like a wimp, mess up your hair, uncomfurtable. The biggest sissies are the ones who wear a helmet while snowboarding.
Fucking lol.
that there is a good call, was riding with a few mates when i was younger and we were in the side of the road which was mostly gravel (like stone gravel not gravel gravel)Kills On Site wrote:I've always worn a helmet and intend to continue. I mainly ride on gravel and offroad, the biggest issue is if you catch some gravel or a pothole worng and you can have some bad wipeouts and it is always good to know your head is protected. I have crashed where I've hit my head, never enough to break a helmet, but it is nice only having to stand up and get back on the bike with no worries of head injuries
so yes wear a helmet
I know a racing cyclist (he's also a bike courier) who hates wearing helmets downtown - he feels less safe with them since they interfere with his comfort.Kracus wrote:The argument is stupid cause ultimately wearing a helmet can only help. The only downfall to a bike helmet is they look kinda stupid unless you're wearing complete cycling gear.
Then he should get a more comfortable helmet because that's a retarded argument vs possibly saving your life. And no it's not a good argument to compare cycling, a vehicle that can go easily 40km/h which is fast enough to kill if your head were to impact the wrong way on say cement or even a sharp object on the ground going 40km/h would more likely kill you than if you had been walking.[xeno]Julios wrote:I know a racing cyclist (he's also a bike courier) who hates wearing helmets downtown - he feels less safe with them since they interfere with his comfort.Kracus wrote:The argument is stupid cause ultimately wearing a helmet can only help. The only downfall to a bike helmet is they look kinda stupid unless you're wearing complete cycling gear.
Also, one could argue that it's stupid to debate whether we should wear helmets when we travel in cars - they can only help right?
Or what about as pedestrians...
I was responding directly to your argument.Kracus wrote:And no it's not a good argument to compare cycling, a vehicle that can go easily 40km/h which is fast enough to kill if your head were to impact the wrong way on say cement or even a sharp object on the ground going 40km/h would more likely kill you than if you had been walking.
Cars have safety features and are basicly a helmet for your entire body so I definitely don't follow you there.
Well perhaps I should have been more clear and stated it can only help while riding a bycicle. Since it's the subject at hand I assumed you would put the two together.[xeno]Julios wrote:I was responding directly to your argument.Kracus wrote:And no it's not a good argument to compare cycling, a vehicle that can go easily 40km/h which is fast enough to kill if your head were to impact the wrong way on say cement or even a sharp object on the ground going 40km/h would more likely kill you than if you had been walking.
Cars have safety features and are basicly a helmet for your entire body so I definitely don't follow you there.
Which was as follows:
Premise: A helmet can only help
Conclusion: It is retarded to argue about helmets
According to this logic, one should wear a helmet as a pedestrian, and/or while travelling in a car.