to .xxx or not to .xxx

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:01 am

http://news.com.com/Bush+administration ... tag=st.pop

Post by **Survivor** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:02 am

That could actually be a good idea as long as noone censors it.

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:14 am

edits for humans by humans

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:19 am

arrrrgeeesmargan@#*()$&

Post by **Massive Quasars** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:21 am

internets^@

Post by **JulesWinnfield** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:35 am

George Bush is a .xxx fairy. Here's a quickezfix to get kiddies off the pr0n and he gets all bible on it.

Post by **ForM** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:51 am

Wouldnt useing xxx make it easier to find?

I remember when I was a frickin lad and mom and dad was gone and I was hopeing for what I was thought as rather hot shit. Being to young and dum and full of come Love American Style was about it.

Today we have free porn that cycles on the net. [chough]winamp[chough]

Its all there. Any topic or type.

xxx would be only for paid services. Kinda like buy a prostatute.

and fuck Bush.

Post by **glossy** » Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:51 am

haha, virtual red-light district

are they worried that they'll have to lock thier doors when browsing through there? that the crime rate would be higher?

have they even used the internet before? fucking idiots.