Firefox 1.0.5 released

Post by **Eraser** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:52 am

http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/

Direct download link

fixes:
MFSA 2005-56 Code execution through shared function objects
MFSA 2005-55 XHTML node spoofing
MFSA 2005-54 Javascript prompt origin spoofing
MFSA 2005-53 Standalone applications can run arbitrary code through the browser
MFSA 2005-52 Same origin violation: frame calling top.focus()
MFSA 2005-51 The return of frame-injection spoofing
MFSA 2005-50 Possibly exploitable crash in InstallVersion.compareTo()
MFSA 2005-49 Script injection from Firefox sidebar panel using data:
MFSA 2005-48 Same-origin violation with InstallTrigger callback
MFSA 2005-47 Code execution via "Set as Wallpaper"
MFSA 2005-46 XBL scripts ran even when Javascript disabled
MFSA 2005-45 Content-generated event vulnerabilities

Post by **rep** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:02 am

Trumping Firefox's typical bug fix release, Opera revolutionizes the browser market AGAIN by adding BitTorrent protocol support. $10 says Mozilla tries to copy this feature sometime.

Opera is the fastest, and most fully featured (best) browser on the market. Firefox will never be good, because the fat lady just sang. It's over. Opera is the best.

http://my.opera.com/forums/showthread.p ... adid=96020
http://www.opera.com/

Post by **mjrpes** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:02 am

I've always had problems with Firefox and video plugins. I have to load a web page in IE if a page has an embedded page. The 'find plugin' feature on firefox has never worked for me and always gives me a 'could not find plugin' message.

Post by **Eraser** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:03 am

never had any problems

Post by **Eraser** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:14 am

rep, you sad pathetic little cunt.
Do you realise what an ass you make out of yourself by posting that? This thread is just informing people of a face, it's not about boasting anything. It's not about saying how Firefox is better than other browsers.

Some people just are content with using Firefox. Some people are even content with using Internet Explorer. If they want to use IE then let them do so. I'm not happy with the functionality and security of IE so I'm using Firefox. I've always used Netscape 4, Netscape 6, Mozilla and now Firefox. It's a logical transition. I'm familiar with the browser's setup, the way I should use it, where I can find additional resources for it, etcetera.

Don't try to "convert me" to Opera because it's no use. I'm not unhappy with Firefox. I'm not looking for an alternative. Firefox is good enough for me, so why switch browsers?

Some people don't care as much about these things as you do. And in fact, calling OPERA OPERA! in every thread makes you look like an acne infested pale skinned flaming nerd.

Post by **glossy** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:18 am

rep wrote:$10 says Mozilla tries to copy this feature sometime.

actually, i'd rather keep my $10. In fact, i'd like to keep my $40 that i could pay for opera and instead keep with Firefox, which is IMHO superior.

and the only fat lady here is you, tubby.

Post by **mjrpes** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:24 am

Rep is a good fisherman. Let's look at rep fish.

rep wrote:Trumping Firefox's typical bug fix release, Opera revolutionizes the browser market AGAIN by adding BitTorrent protocol support. $10 says Mozilla tries to copy this feature sometime.

Oh look! Rep has set his very nice bait in the water. Let's be quiet. What poor hapless fish will be reeled in today by another one of his baseless claim. We see here that his bait consists of taking a word like 'copy' and giving it the connotation of 'steal'. Oh, what poor, miserable fish will take a bite?

Eraser wrote: rep, you sad pathetic little cunt.

Oh my, what a nice looking fish rep has caught today. It is a dutch fish. Rep is very happy now. Look at this long reply given to rep. That makes rep very very happy. Obviously the fish is very upset that he has been snagged by rep. Poor fish. Maybe one day the fishes will ignore rep. But it is hard, sometimes, because rep makes the fishes very fustrated.

Post by **Kills On Site** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:26 am

glossy wrote:
rep wrote:$10 says Mozilla tries to copy this feature sometime.
actually, i'd rather keep my $10. In fact, i'd like to keep my $40 that i could pay for opera and instead keep with Firefox, which is IMHO superior.

and the only fat lady here is you, tubby.

His bet is a feeble attempt to regain the $40 he spent for a web browser

Post by **rep** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:52 am

Eraser wrote:so why switch browsers?

:lol: Because Opera is the fastest, most featured out of the box, best Internet experience. Period.

If you can't afford it, then fuck off. Pennies a day pays for it, and it's well worth it.

Edit: "Oh my GOD! $39 spread out over the span of years??? That's like, half the price of a DATE! With a real girl!" Nurdz.

Post by **mjrpes** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:01 am

rep wrote:
Edit: "Oh my GOD! $39 spread out over the span of years??? That's like, half the price of a DATE! With a real girl!" Nurdz.

Your icon reminds me of badmutha's. Coincidence?

Post by **saturn** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:07 am

mjrpes wrote:Rep is a good fisherman. Let's look at rep fish.

rep wrote:Trumping Firefox's typical bug fix release, Opera revolutionizes the browser market AGAIN by adding BitTorrent protocol support. $10 says Mozilla tries to copy this feature sometime.
Oh look! Rep has set his very nice bait in the water. Let's be quiet. What poor hapless fish will be reeled in today by another one of his baseless claim. We see here that his bait consists of taking a word like 'copy' and giving it the connotation of 'steal'. Oh, what poor, miserable fish will take a bite?

Eraser wrote: rep, you sad pathetic little cunt.
Oh my, what a nice looking fish rep has caught today. It is a dutch fish. Rep is very happy now. Look at this long reply given to rep. That makes rep very very happy. Obviously the fish is very upset that he has been snagged by rep. Poor fish. Maybe one day the fishes will ignore rep. But it is hard, sometimes, because rep makes the fishes very fustrated.

I see what you're doing (and I like the post)

Post by **saturn** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:07 am

anyway, *downloads*

Post by **Eraser** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:08 am

mjrpes wrote:
rep wrote:
Edit: "Oh my GOD! $39 spread out over the span of years??? That's like, half the price of a DATE! With a real girl!" Nurdz.
Your icon reminds me of badmutha's. Coincidence?

Coincidence

Post by **mjrpes** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:10 am

Eraser wrote:
mjrpes wrote:
rep wrote:
Edit: "Oh my GOD! $39 spread out over the span of years??? That's like, half the price of a DATE! With a real girl!" Nurdz.
Your icon reminds me of badmutha's. Coincidence?
Coincidence

You seem very certain.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:33 am

mjrpes wrote:
Eraser wrote:
mjrpes wrote: Your icon reminds me of badmutha's. Coincidence?
Coincidence
You seem very certain.

Coincidence

Post by **MKJ** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:50 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
mjrpes wrote:
Eraser wrote: Coincidence
You seem very certain.
Coincendence

:icon19:

Post by **rep** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:51 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
mjrpes wrote:
Eraser wrote: Coincidence
You seem very certain.
Coincendence

Coincidence

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:52 am

rep wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
mjrpes wrote: You seem very certain.
Coincendence
Coincidence

heh, i just noticed. that's very unlike me. just got home from a 10 hour shift. not an excuse, but a valid reason.

Post by **MKJ** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:53 am

rep wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
mjrpes wrote: You seem very certain.
Coincendence
Coincidence.

pay close attention to your punctuation, sir.

Post by **rep** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:54 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
rep wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote: Coincendence
Coincidence

heh, i just noticed. that's very unlike me. just got home from a 10 hour shift. not an excuse, but a valid reason.

Coincidence

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:55 am

rep wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
rep wrote: Coincidence

heh, i just noticed. that's very unlike me. just got home from a 10 hour shift. not an excuse, but a valid reason.
Coincidence

:icon32:

Post by **rep** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:55 am

MKJ wrote:
rep wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote: Coincendence
Coincidence.
pay close attention to your punctuation, sir.

If it were a proper sentence, then I will. It's no coincidence that I did not include a period.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:58 am

rep wrote:
MKJ wrote:
rep wrote: Coincidence.
pay close attention to your punctuation, sir.
If it were a proper sentence, then I will. It's no coincidence that I did not include a period.

Coincidence.

Post by **MKJ** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:59 am

incidentally, it's quite coincidental that you didn't use a proper sentence.

Post by **saturn** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:01 am