Hopefully they get the balance down. Even if they do, the bad thing about asymmetrical teams is that players will always complain that one side is getting the shaft.
DooMer wrote:Hopefully they get the balance down. Even if they do, the bad thing about asymmetrical teams is that players will always complain that one side is getting the shaft.
Oh no sir. The teams are NOT the same.
Its not like in RtCW, where both teams have different but really the same weapons.
In ET:QW, both teams have 100% DIFFERENT weapons, with DIFFERENT tactics for both sides to use. Playing as a strogg is like playing a different game compared to playing as a marine with Doom 3's Machingun
rep wrote:Anyone else sick of this walk/sprint crap?
Games aren't realistic because you get more than one life. Let us have always run with no limitations, and save walking for when we want to go ninja.
Does this smell like UT2004 to anyone else?
No, it smells like id have finally got the hint everybody else is leaving behind simplistic 1995 games and are actually doing something DIFFERENT for a change...
Remember AVP? That was a pretty cool game that had different classes and was a pretty balanced game played right. I hope they get something like that down too I'd love to play a super agile type of character as opposed to the usual point and shoot a different weapon type of unit.
What the crap.. Why can't people outside US or Canada sign up for e-mail updates? This sucks!
[color=#DFB257][b]کΛFŦ | netrex[/b][/color] of [url=http://www.saft-clan.net/]S.A.F.T. - The Pride of [color=#FF0000]No[/color]rw[color=#0000FF]ay[/color][/url]
rep wrote:Anyone else sick of this walk/sprint crap?
Games aren't realistic because you get more than one life. Let us have always run with no limitations, and save walking for when we want to go ninja.
Does this smell like UT2004 to anyone else?
No, it smells like id have finally got the hint everybody else is leaving behind simplistic 1995 games and are actually doing something DIFFERENT for a change...
