Page 1 of 1

so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:19 am
by SoM
later this year..

[youtube]jmIT8K9Idr4[/youtube]

WTF :olo: :cry: :dork: :mad:

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:49 am
by Whiskey 7
Be sure be sure to skip to 3.45

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:52 am
by Transient
I, for one, welcome a trans Bond. If only because of how many easily-offended people it would trigger. :up:

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:05 am
by Captain
Rebel Media :olo:

The outrage outlet for all the Shapiro/Peterson-worshipping angry virgins of Canada

Oh fuck the comments :olo:
what about a cruel idea ,...but its gonna work 100% i assure...u guys have guns...and the cops are with u all...deport the muslims and nigggers .....and beat up whoever is a feminist and supports trans or gays....i mean this is how muslims do it..and look...the whole west is rooting for those terrorists....and if u wanna beat those sand devils and their slaveniggers,....u have to awaken the whitepower crusader beast within u .....uve to become bad to beat bad....how does it sound....destroy the mosques and saracens's filths and built more and more churches./...and put women where they belong.,,.,,,,,,they are meant to assist not rule......see this is why muslimfuckwits are winning...they know how to keep their women in check.....but u whites gave ur women too much freedom that theyre now rooting against u....WAKE UP BRAVE WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN MEN

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:57 am
by Eraser
Jesus Christ, what a piece of shit.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 10:00 am
by vesp
wow what.. this isn't a joke/parody youtube? Jesus christ

Trans-bond-er
Sgt Surprise Package
Frankenfemale

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 3:46 pm
by Κracus
Captain Mazda wrote:Rebel Media :olo:

The outrage outlet for all the Shapiro/Peterson-worshipping angry virgins of Canada

Oh fuck the comments :olo:
what about a cruel idea ,...but its gonna work 100% i assure...u guys have guns...and the cops are with u all...deport the muslims and [LOL RACISM] .....and beat up whoever is a feminist and supports trans or gays....i mean this is how muslims do it..and look...the whole west is rooting for those terrorists....and if u wanna beat those sand devils and their slaveniggers,....u have to awaken the whitepower crusader beast within u .....uve to become bad to beat bad....how does it sound....destroy the mosques and saracens's filths and built more and more churches./...and put women where they belong.,,.,,,,,,they are meant to assist not rule......see this is why muslimfuckwits are winning...they know how to keep their women in check.....but u whites gave ur women too much freedom that theyre now rooting against u....WAKE UP BRAVE WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN MEN

You know, as much flack as Peterson gets I just don't get it. I feel like someone got offended by his stance of freedom of speech and it's since spiraled into this weird thing where he's a racist women hating incel. I've listened to a few of his interviews and he seems to have a pretty educated view on a lot of subjects so I'm not sure where this is coming from as I actually agree with what he's saying. I think the uproar around Peterson revolves around him pushing back against learning institutions deciding to restrict referring to a students gender which is honestly pretty fucking retarded and goes against the concept of free speech.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2019 8:35 pm
by seremtan
lol, Rebel Media. these guys used to employ Tommy Robinson and Lauren Southern

this is almost as retarded as taking HuffPo seriously

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 6:26 am
by Captain
Peterson is a bible-thumping weirdo with a cult following of anti-social angry virgins and white christian dudebros that adore him because he pissed off a bunch of mentally-challenged pink-haired SJWs. He debates emotional and idiotic college students and does interviews with piss-poor journalists...and Joe Rogan. It's quite easy to look intellectually superior against people like that if you speak softly and remain calm. His entire shtick revolves around using the bible and corporate capitalism as core tenets of a utopian society while claiming North America has been taken over by socialism and the extreme left when it's actually neo-liberalism.

TLDR; both neo-liberals and neo-conservatives are equally retarded and regressive and I hope they finally just kill each other off.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:23 pm
by Κracus
I agree with the cult following statements but I've never heard any bible thumping from him. He mostly talks about psychology and concepts which he doesn't necessarily agree with like Marxism.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 3:23 pm
by Captain
He regularly makes biblical lectures where the underlying theme is that the bible is the foundation of western ideals: democracy, glorious capitalism, freedom, and justice. He doesn't have the balls to criticize the bible or denounce western religion because he knows it's a key demographic of his cult following. I'd respect him more if he came out and said all religions are regressive and poisonous but that's never going to happen.

I've watched a lot of his online lectures and practically every interview and debate involving him because I was initially on his side when he was opposing the neo-liberal PC groupthink. Then I realized he's a corporate capitalism apologist who pretends to care about inequality but is fervently in support of the system that depends on mass inequality to exist.

That being said, none of this matters if we don't turn our focus to climate change instead. We also won't see any progress made towards ensuring the survival of our species as long as corporatocracy rules the world.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:56 am
by Transient
Nah, we're doomed. I think our generation may be the last one to see a comfortably hospitable planet. Climate change has a lot of momentum behind it, and even if we stop burning all fossil fuel tomorrow, the planet is still going to cook.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:18 pm
by Captain
[youtube]iLoDX1HheFY[/youtube]

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:00 am
by Don Carlos
That was painful to watch...I lasted 8 minutes

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:21 pm
by Κracus
Yeah... honestly that dude is super annoying, the announcer, not Peterson. Here's my take on that. The podcast guy is pretty one sided on his opinion, he completely takes Peterson's point about the far left being a problem out of context. I don't think he's saying equality of outcome is necessarily a bad thing but rather that enforcing equality of outcome in a draconian way is. I've heard him say this repeatedly that the middle ground between the far left and the far right is really where you want to be but no one discusses this because highlighting the extremes is where the media gets the most attention and he's correct. With the far right you get totalitarianism and the far left you get communism. Both ideas might be good on paper but they're terrible in practice. However that doesn't mean we should give up on equality of outcome or that people shouldn't have access to basic needs which is where these guys doing the podcast pretty much lose all credibility because they want to make it sound like Peterson is saying that's bad but he isn't, they're just putting words in his mouth.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:17 pm
by Captain
lol, the so-called far left in the G8 are neo-liberals which on the spectrum is center right. The ideological war is a distraction, both are working towards the same corporatocracy but with different means. The neo-con side is just filled with more religious extremists because they favour the evangelicals.

You should read this btw: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/2018/05 ... erous.html

Like I said, I agreed with him when he was speaking against censorship and supported his opinions with basic facts on biology, but the more traction he gained, the more he branched off into the pseudo-science/pro-capitalist/evangelical lobster monogamy nonsense until he hit full-retard status with his carnivore diet rofl

Regardless of what you think he's preaching, his fanbase is full of basement-dwelling, socially-inept, nationalistic angry white virgins growing up in christian households. He doesn't denounce these people, merely claims they're misunderstood and should be paired up with some poor girl. I've yet to see a single fervent JP lover who didn't have some kind of clear mental or social instability. Remember Memphis?

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 4:58 pm
by Κracus
Yeah that's the type I picture when I think of his supporters. I have a friend on facebook I'm sure is a huge fan of his, I lambast the guy every time he posts something because it's so fucking stupid. His last post was something about a 50 year old writer that only dates girls in his 30's. I'm like ok, kudos to that guy, who cares if it's consenting adults but then he had to add how women 50 years old had no sexual value... I really felt like reminding him that he's 40 and has no sexual value to women in general, let alone a 50 year old one but that age isn't the reason why...

Either way, I get his stance on monogamy, I'm not saying I necessarily agree with it but I'm not exactly against it either. He's not wrong that a society with a family hierarchy consisting of a mother and father is probably better for the kids. I can't really refute that but yeah, it's not set in stone, you can grow up in a single parent household and turn out alright too.

Edit: I actually have already read that article... The guy seems a little jealous. I agree with Peterson on the gender/language debate, it's going too far in what's deemed acceptable to the point where people are assigning genders they create for themselves. Like, I get it that you're a bronie but for real guy, you're male, fucking get over, I don't care if you like to fuck my little ponies.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 11:09 pm
by Transient
Κracus wrote:it's going too far in what's deemed acceptable to the point where people are assigning genders they create for themselves
That's just an extremely vocal minority. With social media, they simply have an easier time being heard. They don't really represent the majority of people looking for equal rights. These idiot YouTube personalities are transfixed on them as if genderfluid people are coming out of the woodwork. Just like Nazis aren't taking over the Republican party; there are just a few very vocal assholes who suck up all the media's attention.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:07 am
by Captain
What Transient said. The mentally-ill SJWs are completely unheard of in my life unless I go on twatter—which I don't. They have nothing to offer society (like the alt right) and I doubt they'll ever amass any real power because they're intellectually and physically feeble. Most of these people will die if their internet access is cut off for any duration of time.

What we should be doing is supporting progressive movements in our own countries and bringing to the forefront the destruction we're facing with climate change.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:10 pm
by seremtan
Captain Mazda wrote:*vid*
"calmly obliterates"

these clickbait titles are just getting silly now

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 6:20 pm
by Κracus
Transient wrote:
Κracus wrote:it's going too far in what's deemed acceptable to the point where people are assigning genders they create for themselves
That's just an extremely vocal minority. With social media, they simply have an easier time being heard. They don't really represent the majority of people looking for equal rights. These idiot YouTube personalities are transfixed on them as if genderfluid people are coming out of the woodwork. Just like Nazis aren't taking over the Republican party; there are just a few very vocal assholes who suck up all the media's attention.
That's sort of my point, this vocal minority is enacting policies in universities that explicitly limit what teachers and staff are allowed to say/use in terms of gender pronouns when referring to students. Basically limiting what a teacher is allowed to say. I think that's foolish and this is what Peterson is referring to when he's talking about this topic. That whole concept is from the extreme left and he's against it because it limits free speech. That isn't to say the left doesn't have a point but that you need to dial down how we as a society should enforce those values on other people. It's a pretty reasonable point of view.

My original point here was that I don't get the hate toward Peterson by a lot of people, especially the left. His shit gets taken out of context, a bunch of incels end up worshiping him because of this out of context bullshit and yeah, that video doesn't really change my opinion of him. It's just more left wing nuts taking shit out of context, inserting ideas he never said into them and then putting up a shit video of themselves freaking out and making fun of someone. That's fine too, I just don't necessarily agree with some of what they're saying. Still don't see the bible thumping either.

Re: so after Daniel Craig is done with 007

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:12 am
by Transient
Those vocal minorities aren't enacting the policies, the universities are enacting the policies themselves. They could stop tomorrow; I don't know why they get so manipulated by social media whims. :shrug: