Vegas...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Vegas...

Post by Don Carlos »

Death in

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41466116

At least 20 dead so far and 100 injured
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Vegas...

Post by scared? »

Lol country music fans...
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by xer0s »

50 dead.

That makes it a new record. Terrible...
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Don Carlos »

Fucking hell :(
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by MKJ »

He was described as a “lone wolf” with no known links to terrorist organizations.
White, therefore not a terrorist attack.
Lieutenant Dan
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:25 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Lieutenant Dan »

The sound clips I heard from it, sounded like automatic gunfire. Like shooting fish in a barrel :(
lars63
Posts: 2927
Joined: Mon May 15, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by lars63 »

Seems like things like this are becoming the norm and not the exception
Member: [url=http://www.nad.org]NAD[/url]&[url=http://www.bta4bikes.org/]BTA[/url]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Quake Addict
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by obsidian »

Apparently, gunman was on the 30th floor, broke the window and started shooting down on people. :(
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Transient »

That's so fucked up...
Nevada has some of the least stringent gun laws in the United States.
People are allowed to carry weapons and do not have to register themselves as a gun-owner.
Background checks are done when people buy guns, but they are also allowed to sell them privately.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Don Carlos »

58 people dead
515 injured
SoM
Posts: 8489
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by SoM »

Dark Metal on vacation
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Doombrain »

Fuck me, i've been following this all day and it keeps getting worse. How was he allowed to sustain an attack like this? He had 6-7 long range weapons? The only other places on earth this happens are places like the Congo...
SoM
Posts: 8489
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by SoM »

concert
loud music
high ground
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by seremtan »

MKJ wrote:
He was described as a “lone wolf” with no known links to terrorist organizations.
White, therefore not a terrorist attack.
not an attack on civilians for the purpose of changing government policy, therefore not a terrorist attack

race or links to organisations have nothing to do with it
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by xer0s »

Yeah, I have to agree. Whether or not the attack is labeled a terrorist act or not all depends on the motive...
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Captain »

Phew, ok that's a relief.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by MKJ »

I'm glad we cleared that up.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Doombrain »

I'm the leader of this clan.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by seremtan »

xer0s wrote:Whether or not the attack is labeled a terrorist act or not all depends on the motive...
uh, what?

whether or not it's labelled a terrorist act depends on whether or not the person doing the labelling knows the meaning of the word terrorism
The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
if this Oswald wannabee had political aims, we've yet to hear about them
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by losCHUNK »

So it depends on his motive and if it had political aims ? :)
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Eraser »

Political aims aren't a motive?
Ganemi
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:57 pm

Re: Vegas...

Post by Ganemi »

Well, that one guy shooting up a BLM protest and injuring 5 people (who were later treated as perps, and the shooter like a victim until it was later proven he was there explicitly to shoot 'black guys'), that's terrorism. Running over protesters is terrorism. The Drug War, considering it's origin, how it was constructed, and the motives that most people aren't aware of, can be argued as terrorism.

A mass shooting isn't really terrorism, because that would change the way that it should be dealt with, most likely meaning a global restriction on a wide array of freedoms.

We really need to be careful what we call terrorism.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Transient »

Yeah, God forbid Americans had less access to firearms...
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
Bacon
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 7:00 am

Re: Vegas...

Post by Bacon »

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas
[b]CAPSLOCK IS ON[/b]
Ganemi
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:57 pm

Re: Vegas...

Post by Ganemi »

Transient wrote:Yeah, God forbid Americans had less access to firearms...
What I'm saying is that wouldn't even happen. You'd probably get stupid rule changes that mostly apply to areas where individual, personal mass shootings take place because of heavy prohibition enforcement, and not to areas where the people who lobby the government actually have massive stockpiles of guns that can kill hundreds of people.

If you start calling this terrorism, it will A: Exacerbate instances where this happens, and B: Drive shootings in places like Chicago to be classified as "terrorism" when they have absolutely nothing to do with politics, and are mostly driven by a complete lack of jobs thanks to automation and out sourcing, and the Drug War, which allows mediocre government officials to manufacture crime out of poverty.

The only way they could be terrorism is if, say, a bunch of people from one group went somewhere a bunch of people from another group were just to shoot them so that they would no longer show up in public or do things as a community, which is why I mentioned the Drug War as terrorism, and not, say, Columbine.
Post Reply