Supreme Douchebag

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5980
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Supreme Douchebag

Post by Κracus »

Image

Seriously, this guy needs a punch in the face.
LawL
Posts: 18358
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:49 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by LawL »

Lucky for him you aren't in the same room.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5980
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Κracus »

That's right.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by plained »

yea he is a dickhead
it is about time!
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5980
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Κracus »

In case anyone doesn't know who this shithead is, he's the douchbag that raised the price of a life saving drug 5000% after buying the rights to it. The drugs been in production for something like 60 years and been available under 20$ a pill and he wants to hike the price to 700$ per pill.

I shit you not, his reasoning is that because it's saving your life, it shouldn't be so cheap. What a fucking shithead.

Seriously sys0p, this is exactly the kind of shit I was talking about yesterday. People produce a product at pennies per unit then turn around and charge ludicrous amounts for no good reason other than to do it. Face cream is one thing, but life saving pills... Man that's another whole level of being a complete turd. IMHO, I hope he's held liable for any deaths that are directly linked to people being unable to afford this drug when they could previously.
syp0s
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 9:58 pm

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by syp0s »

Isn't this mostly just leveraging insurance companies? I know it comes across as inhuman, and he does come across as a complete scumbag, but I don't think anyone is paying for these drugs out of their own pocket, hence the 5000% price hike.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5980
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Κracus »

Well I'd imagine anyone without insurance would have been. But yeah, you're right, it's a symptom of a much larger problem which is of course insurance companies.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Eraser »

syp0s wrote:Isn't this mostly just leveraging insurance companies? I know it comes across as inhuman, and he does come across as a complete scumbag, but I don't think anyone is paying for these drugs out of their own pocket, hence the 5000% price hike.
Uh, what? Who is paying the insurance companies you think? That's right: you, me and everyone that has an insurance.
syp0s
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 9:58 pm

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by syp0s »

Thanks for that. I hadn't, up until now, realised that I paid insurance companies.

A revelation.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Eraser »

The way you formulated it made it look like you was arguing this price increase is actually OK ("it comes across as inhuman but it really isn't because people aren't paying for it, insurance companies are")
Silicone_Milk
Posts: 2237
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:49 pm

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Silicone_Milk »

Sure, it's shitty, but that's capitalism for you.
"Drug rights" shouldn't be legally allowed to be privately held by any single entity. Medication rights should immediately fall into public domain to prevent exactly this kind of nonsense from happening.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by mrd »

Maybe he will die of HIV.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by MKJ »

The most punchable face.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Eraser »

Silicone_Milk wrote:Sure, it's shitty, but that's capitalism for you.
"Drug rights" shouldn't be legally allowed to be privately held by any single entity. Medication rights should immediately fall into public domain to prevent exactly this kind of nonsense from happening.
While I agree, I can also understand that companies aren't keen on putting the rights to their product in the public domain after spending hundreds of millions of dollars into research for it.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by mrd »

Not sure why it matters. Most drugs don't do a fucking thing and just give you crazy bizarre side-effects. You don't think drug companies give a fuck about actually helping people do you?
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Transient »

Only if it helps their bottom line (it does not).
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Eraser »

mrd wrote:Not sure why it matters. Most drugs don't do a fucking thing and just give you crazy bizarre side-effects. You don't think drug companies give a fuck about actually helping people do you?
Hmm, that triggers my "baseless conspiracy theory" detector a bit too much.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Eraser »

I wonder if there are any alternatives to this drug. If so, insurance companies could boycott this drug and run his company into the ground.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36017
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by seremtan »

Eraser wrote:
mrd wrote:Not sure why it matters. Most drugs don't do a fucking thing and just give you crazy bizarre side-effects. You don't think drug companies give a fuck about actually helping people do you?
Hmm, that triggers my "baseless conspiracy theory" detector a bit too much.
it also triggers my 'total bollocks' detectomatic 9000

if drugs did fuck-all, every pharma company would go out of business
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by obsidian »

Sounds like self-justification for not taking *his* pills.

The multi-billion health-supplement industry is mostly a scam (or at least offering minimal benefit), but the pharmaceutical industry most certainly is not.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by mrd »

:olo: I don't take any pills... not yet. 'Twas a stupid blanket statement, not to be taken too literally. Some drugs suck, some are OK, some are great. Drug companies have definitely been implicated in fabricating the efficacy of their drugs, or using other immoral means to push their products, which means I am wary by default of most drug offerings. But I don't mind getting into the nitty gritty of the biology behind it. Reading about enzyme pathway action and receptor antagonism gets my juices flowing.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by scared? »

He got arrested on securities fraud... :olo: ...
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015- ... ies-fraud/
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Eraser »

This whole Wu Tang Clan ordeal would be hilarious if it was any other person doing it.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by Transient »

scared? wrote:He got arrested on securities fraud... :olo: ...
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015- ... ies-fraud/
This gives me hope for humanity.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
xer0s
Posts: 12447
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Supreme Douchebag

Post by xer0s »

Really? That's what give you hope?
Post Reply