do u prefer ISIS or USA in the Middle East...

Post by **scared?** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:05 pm

Mainly becuz feedback is a tremendous narcisstic shirtless fascist cunt and I prefer the opposite of whatever he likes... Also it's just Sunni's taking their shit back after we took it away. The religious fanaticism is also just a reaction to more shit we have done to them...

Go ISIS!...

Post by **Ryoki** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:32 pm

I follow it a bit, it satisfies my dark humor need and tickles my cynicism gland.

Gems like the Turks bombing YGP positions near Kobane this week and the Israelis semi regular bombing of Syria army positions and downing of their jets are good examples of extremely cynical foreign policy for instance. Then theres the recent news that a Dutch biker gang has sent several members to 'aid the Kurds'. Good times indeed, you can't make this shit up. Oh and the name for the US led operation against IS was announced today; Inherent Resolve. Wow eh, two months of action and they come up with this? Weak. In any case, it's more like Incoherent Response amirite? Hawhaw.

Ah yes, news from the middle east, always good for a laugh.

Post by **scared?** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:15 pm

100% agreement... I'm always right...

...

Post by **xer0s** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:44 pm

The Middle East is a religious disaster of the highest magnitude. They'll be fighting for thousands of years to come, or until a few nukes makes the land unlivable and everyone moves on...

Post by **seremtan** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:59 pm

if you answered ISIS, you're a massive retard

seriously, kill yourself now and spare the gene pool

Post by **scared?** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:10 pm

Besides the religious moronics From ISIS, they ain't that bad... The destruction they give out is far less brutal than what the Americans have done.... They also have wide spread support of Sunnis... Who were fucked by the gulf wars... They are just taking it back... The religious dipshits will get weeded out over the years (as all religions). Go ISIS!...

Post by **Eraser** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:33 pm

scared? wrote:Besides the religious moronics From ISIS, they ain't that bad... The destruction they give out is far less brutal than what the Americans have done....

If ISIS had nukes they'd have used 'em by now. It's not a case of Won't, it's a case of Can't.

Post by **scared?** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:37 pm

Retarded speculation based on misinformed media influence...

Post by **seremtan** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:00 pm

^

ISIS' motto is "no borders, only fronts"

and by fronts I mean places where you get your head cut off if you don't join the psycho freak gang

Post by **xer0s** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:18 pm

Memphis wrote:Humanity is probably at it's peak of advancement as a race until all religion is completely stamped out...

The Great Filter...

Post by **scared?** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:55 pm

Omg they cut a few heads off... Quit being a pussy...

Post by **Captain** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:59 pm

Lots of morons in this thread who think the ISIS is some kind of unstoppable war machine. They're just the next terrorist proxy for the United States of Israel, just like Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Mujahideen, etc. etc.

Post by **xer0s** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:19 pm

Who said or even hinted that ISIS was an "unstoppable war machine"?

Post by **Captain** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:27 pm

xer0s wrote:The Middle East is a religious disaster of the highest magnitude. They'll be fighting for thousands of years to come, or until a few nukes makes the land unlivable and everyone moves on...

Some moron

Post by **xer0s** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 8:41 pm

Yeah, I see nothing about ISIS...

Post by **Captain** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:14 pm

What you don't see could fill an ocean.

Post by **seremtan** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:23 pm

Captain Mazda wrote:They're just the next terrorist proxy for the United States of Israel, just like Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Mujahideen, etc. etc.

Post by **Captain** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:39 pm

We’re being told that the black-clad ISIS jihadists have been burning and beheading their way through Iraq and after taking control of an oil stronghold within the Mosul region, a clearer picture has emerged as to those who stand to benefit the most by supporting such awful carnage in the second-largest oil state in world. Well-known geopolitical analyst and strategic risk consultant, William Engdahl states in his latest release, “ISIS in Iraq stinks of CIA/NATO ‘dirty war’ op,” that their is a decidedly Western bend to the propaganda and violence seen coming out about ISIS:

“The very details of the ISIS military success in the key Iraqi oil center, Mosul, are suspect. According to well-informed Iraqi journalists, ISIS overran the strategic Mosul region, site of some of the world’s most prolific oilfields, with barely a shot fired in resistance. According to one report, residents of Tikrit reported remarkable displays of “soldiers handing over their weapons and uniforms peacefully to militants who ordinarily would have been expected to kill government soldiers on the spot.”

We are told that ISIS masked psychopaths captured “arms and ammunition from the fleeing security forces” - arms and ammunition supplied by the American government. The offensive coincides with a successful campaign by ISIS in eastern Syria. According to Iraqi journalists, Sunni tribal chiefs in the region had been convinced to side with ISIS against the Shiite Al-Maliki government in Baghdad. They were promised a better deal under ISIS Sunni Sharia than with Baghdad anti-Sunni rule.”

When looking for the motive in any ‘global crime’ we must always consider what natural resources are being fought over and those that are being pillaged, as they are often followed by some sort of destabilization campaign prompting media to declare a one-sided call to action as a remedy for an already destructive process. We should also examine the motivations of foreign aid or weaponry given to destabilized regions of the world as it often coincides with a future ‘regime change’ about to take place. It should be noted that last year Syrian oil field’s had also been seized by an Al-Qaeda affiliate - which would directly benefit the wider geopolitical and transnational corporate interests of the West.

Also, what kind of compliance is expected from groups receiving aid from Western interests and how will they seek to inflame and polarize audiences by utilizing the existing rift between Shia-Sunni denominations?

Additionally, the West attempts to gain a foothold on the Middle East by strengthening Sunni terror brigades, clamping down on the Shia sect. Western interests also want the Shia-dominated Maliki government out of power in Baghdad.

In November 2013, according to the FBI dozens of terrorists were allowed to come to the US under refugee status and in 2009, they discovered two Al-Qaeda terrorists living in Bowling Green, Kentucky.

Why were known terrorists allowed to come to the US? There appears to be an substantial effort to bring terror to Western countries. Why? Is it so that they can justify their expensive war theater?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/invading-i ... eg/5388616

Post by **losCHUNK** » Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:51 pm

A website that alleges vote rigging, ebola sensationalism and 'conclusive proof' of the MH17 flight being shotdown by ukranian planes.

When did you go full moron and don your tinfoil hat ?, it was obvious Iraq and the surrounding areas were going to implode before America even pulled out and now it has actually happened it's hard to believe ?. Even the most bat shit insane Muslims think ISIS is insane.

Post by **scared?** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:09 am

Global research Mazda?... Really?...

...

Post by **mrd** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:16 am

Memphis wrote:So, fuck it all and make some tea. Wrap a fatty, watch the BBC.

I'm stealing that line, mo'fucka

Post by **Whiskey 7** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:32 am

mrd wrote:
Memphis wrote:So, fuck it all and make some tea. Wrap a fatty, watch the BBC.
I'm stealing that line, mo'fucka

I rhymes so well too.

I now wonder why I voted in this poll

Post by **Captain** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:39 am

http://guardianlv.com/2014/06/isis-trai ... overnment/
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/10/15 ... ashington/

Better, retards? Also, what constitutes a credible source for you? BBC? AP? I'm really curious where you enlightened cocksmokers get your misinformation from.

And if you're too daft to see how the US and Saudis are using ISIS to attack countries with Shia leadership (Iraq, Syria, Iran), maybe you should go put on some fresh Nike pumps and join them.

Post by **Whiskey 7** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 6:59 am

I am so glad I am not be involved in this forum debate and just scanning worthless comments.

The word "cocksmokers" bought tears to my eyes in laughter so thanks Captain Mazda

Post by **scared?** » Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:33 am

I'm with ya Mazda, but globalresearch is a go to web site of Alex Jones. Just saying...