Lol, look at this stupid bitch

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

bloody scallies.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Haha, she'll look absolutely awful in about 10 years :)
LeonardoP
Posts: 811
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2000 7:00 am

Post by LeonardoP »

haha i continue to be dumbfounded by these retards
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

well... she's kinda hot for her age. ( a bit skinny around her shoulders though.)

but i prefer bright skin.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

Ryoki wrote:Haha, she'll look absolutely awful in about 10 years :)
true :smirk:

she's got that kind of face that starts to look like a drug/aids/cancer whore at the age 30
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36018
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Post by seremtan »

Most Merseysiders have to tan for a year just to get white.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

seremtan wrote:Most Brits have to tan for a year just to get white.
fixed it for you
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

West Derby, nice.
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

she's missing her 5 kids in the photo
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

Her parents should be publically flogged
Don Carlos
Posts: 17513
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

stoned...please?
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

STONING'S TOO GOOD FOR THEM >:-E
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19181
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Eraser »

Lol, it's michael jackson in reverse
shadd_.
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:28 pm

Post by shadd_. »

Eraser wrote:Lol, it's michael jackson in reverse
yeah but she's allowed to touch young boys.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

why "tanorexic" and not "tanaholic"? scouse ejits. surely if someone was "tanorexic" they'd avoid bright lights, like soapboy does.
maybe if they were "tanulemic" they could go to the tanning booth, but then flay themselves afterwards.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

Yeah, but "tanoholic" means "addicted to tan with an -OH group", which is just as bad.
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

shadd_. wrote:
Eraser wrote:Lol, it's michael jackson in reverse
yeah but she's allowed to touch young boys.
:icon19:
Giraffe }{unter
Posts: 2941
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Giraffe }{unter »

:icon19:

:tanorexic"

"Being brown is very important to me. It suits me better. I just can't imagine being white," she said.
[url=http://www.dumpt.com][img]http://www.giraffe-hunter.com/images/dumpt.gif[/img][/url]
[size=85]DUMPT.com fully revamped, simple image hosting/dumping ground
No registration required![/size]
Denz
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Denz »

she's an idiot.

And her parents are idiots too.

I want to fuck her in the mouth.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

Denz wrote:I want to fuck her in the mouth.
careful you don't knock any of her milk teeth out.
Denz
Posts: 2587
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Denz »

4days wrote:
Denz wrote:I want to fuck her in the mouth.
careful you don't knock any of her milk teeth out.
Well she better not bite down, or will have to pop her in the back of her head.
Guest

Post by Guest »

I think this is what's called natural selection.
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

I'd hit it
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by andyman »

I'd stick it in her brown eye hehe
Post Reply