Simple Physics Question

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
XaNaDu
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:03 pm

Simple Physics Question

Post by XaNaDu »

Let's say I have two objects on a surface. They collide with each other. Assuming there is no friction & air resistance, does changing the elasticity of one object affect whether momentum is conserved? There aren't any external forces so the system conserves momentum regardless if I alter the elasticity of the objects, right?
Last edited by XaNaDu on Mon May 02, 2005 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Sort of...I think.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

from what i remember, yes.

do your homework ( and learn to use google!! <- someone should reiterate this ): http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/p ... u4l2b.html
XaNaDu
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:03 pm

/callvote tnf FOR MODERATOR - F1

Post by XaNaDu »

I've used google already (in fact I have 4-5 different physics related sites open right now), most of them talked about how KE is lost in that situation but don't mention the effect of elasticity on momentum. I just wanted to confirm that my assumption was correct. :icon25:
Last edited by XaNaDu on Mon May 02, 2005 10:53 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

btw - if there is no friction and no air resistance every collision on your 'surface' is equivalent to a collision in 3d space. both cases are mathematically isomorph.
XaNaDu
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:03 pm

Post by XaNaDu »

<img src="http://www.quake3world.com/forum/images/smiles/dork.gif" height="200" width="200">

Well thanks for the help, I'm going to play some quake now. :icon34:
Last edited by XaNaDu on Mon May 02, 2005 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

Some of the potential energy goes into deforming an object of lesser elasticity. Imagine a rock hitting a clay ball, energy goes into changing the shape of the clay, which reduces the remaining momentum of both objects.

At least if I'm understanding your question.

Or I could be wrong. :)
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Post by Pext »

on the other hand the clay ball deforms the rock as well... but only a bit :)
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

True. But both ways energy goes into altering the objects, and is then lost from the momentum.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Imagine if 2 cars hit each over compared to 2 huge marble spheres. Both in the same context, but the two cars will deform and won't bounce off each other. The marble balls will.
Oldfriend
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 6:07 am

Post by Oldfriend »

actually they do bounce off, depends on the speed... if the material can absorb the potential energy and all.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

this is something I never understood - if the balls are perfectly elastic then no energy is lost in the collision.

so kinetic energy & momentum must be conserved right?

surely if kinetic energy is conserved, momentum is also right?

and if KE is lost, then momentum must be also lost right?
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

this looks like a job for smeester :o
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Guest

Post by Guest »

[xeno]Julios wrote:this is something I never understood - if the balls are perfectly elastic then no energy is lost in the collision.

so kinetic energy & momentum must be conserved right?

surely if kinetic energy is conserved, momentum is also right?

and if KE is lost, then momentum must be also lost right?
Exactly. If 2 balls roll into each other at equal velocities, the KE will cancel out. If one ball rolls into another who's standing still, the rolling ball will give all his KE energy to the ball who's standing still.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

You'll always lose a little momentum when two objects collide no matter what the material is - some energy will go into deforming or heating the objects, which will be taken away from the momentum.

So to answer your question, changing the elasticity of one object can affect how MUCH momentum is conserved. You didn't specify the mass of the objects or anything else, so it's impossible to answer how much would be lost to a certain amount of elasticity. An object with a low mass hitting a massive piece of clay will lose a lot of momentum, whereas a solid object of greater mass hitting a smaller piece of clay won't lose nearly as much. :smirk:
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

R00k wrote:You'll always lose a little momentum when two objects collide no matter what the material is - some energy will go into deforming or heating the objects, which will be taken away from the momentum.

So to answer your question, changing the elasticity of one object can affect how MUCH momentum is conserved. You didn't specify the mass of the objects or anything else, so it's impossible to answer how much would be lost to a certain amount of elasticity. An object with a low mass hitting a massive piece of clay will lose a lot of momentum, whereas a solid object of greater mass hitting a smaller piece of clay won't lose nearly as much. :smirk:
but what if it were perfectly elastic (hypothetical ideal) - would momentum & kinetic energy be perfectly preserved? I remember learning that it wouldn't (or maybe i learned that in a non-perfect collision, momentum would be conserved but not KE, or vice versa)


fuckin confused
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

In perfectly elastic collisions, both momentum and total energy(kinetic and potential) are conserved. There is no loss of energy through irrecoverable processes.
Post Reply