scared...to read?...
http://dotconnectoruk.blogspot.com/2008 ... ed-to.html
american history ur not supposed to know...
-
QuakeThane
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:45 am
Re: american history ur not supposed to know...
HAX!
UNfortunately I am Hack proof since I post from a CIA computer.
UNfortunately I am Hack proof since I post from a CIA computer.
[b][color=#FFFF00]The return of the New Legendary Horka Thane![/color][/b]
[i][color=#FF0000]The 6 pack rests in peace[/color][/i]
[i][color=#FF0000]The 6 pack rests in peace[/color][/i]
Re: american history ur not supposed to know...
Its fun reading, much like Palin who doesn't believe that global warming exists.
Joe Perez is a sad misguided attention seeker who throws out conjecture and tries to pose it as fact. I think he believes the sad little blogs he writes and for that I pity him. An example would be the "Somerset decision of 1772" which Joe poses as a strict ruling overturning slavery in Britain."
[Joe Perez writes] In his decision, Lord Mansfield declared that “slavery is not allowed nor approved by the law of England”
But (back to reality) Judge Mansfield himself said, "all that he actually decided was that a slave could not be forcibly removed from England against his will." Somehow Joe turns this into a ruling by the judge that slavery is not allowed in England. Further, Mansfield himself kept an African female slave. We also all know that slaves were emancipated by Act of the British Parliament in 1834.
From a scientific viewpoint, if an article is filled with errors, you should just disregard the entire article. So, his blogs are worthless but someone should give poor Joe (and user:scared?) a few pennies for their troubles.
Joe Perez is a sad misguided attention seeker who throws out conjecture and tries to pose it as fact. I think he believes the sad little blogs he writes and for that I pity him. An example would be the "Somerset decision of 1772" which Joe poses as a strict ruling overturning slavery in Britain."
[Joe Perez writes] In his decision, Lord Mansfield declared that “slavery is not allowed nor approved by the law of England”
But (back to reality) Judge Mansfield himself said, "all that he actually decided was that a slave could not be forcibly removed from England against his will." Somehow Joe turns this into a ruling by the judge that slavery is not allowed in England. Further, Mansfield himself kept an African female slave. We also all know that slaves were emancipated by Act of the British Parliament in 1834.
From a scientific viewpoint, if an article is filled with errors, you should just disregard the entire article. So, his blogs are worthless but someone should give poor Joe (and user:scared?) a few pennies for their troubles.
-
old nik (q3w): hack103
old nik (q3w): hack103
Re: american history ur not supposed to know...
The thing about the American Revolution being a lie because of the Proclamation of 1763 really being about "protect the Indian traditional way of life" is bullshit because the proclamation was designed to keep the colonists from pissing off France at a time when Britain couldn't afford a war.
For one thing, the colonists were deeply in debt and needed more land to make enough money to pay off debts. Lots of guys committed suicide because of this.
They also had this odd Spartan-inspired republican vision of a virtuous, agrarian America, but the problem was that they were running out of land. This effectively cut off one of the major ways a man could be a man and not some useless prick.
If the British government had realized this and respected these guys enough to invite them into the Peerage like their West Indian sugar growing counterparts, this might have mattered much.
For one thing, the colonists were deeply in debt and needed more land to make enough money to pay off debts. Lots of guys committed suicide because of this.
They also had this odd Spartan-inspired republican vision of a virtuous, agrarian America, but the problem was that they were running out of land. This effectively cut off one of the major ways a man could be a man and not some useless prick.
If the British government had realized this and respected these guys enough to invite them into the Peerage like their West Indian sugar growing counterparts, this might have mattered much.
Re: american history ur not supposed to know...
I was already taught all that in high school.