umm... what... the... FUCK

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

umm... what... the... FUCK

Post by [xeno]Julios »

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s ... leuaecamel

Robots will replace child camel jockeys in UAE

DUBAI (AFP) - The United Arab Emirates is to mount robot jockeys on racing camels later this year after a ban on using children in the region's popular sport.

Image

It will become the second Gulf Arab state, after Qatar, to use robots and ban child jockeys following criticism that infants, some as young as four, were being brought in from poor countries to race the camels.

The UAE's first robot jockey exercise has been successfully carried out in the capital, Abu Dhabi, according to media reports this week which also said that the first robots would be produced in August, ready for use in the next camel racing season.

Last month, the UAE declared the use of jockeys under the age of 16 and weighing less than 45 kilograms (100 pounds) illegal from April 16.

The UAE had in principle already banned the use of children under 15 since 1993 but abuses remain widespread and no one has ever been brought to justice.

The US State Department and human rights groups say children are exploited by traffickers who pay their impoverished parents a paltry sum or simply kidnap their victims.

The children, mostly from Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan, are then smuggled into the Gulf states.

They are often starved by employers to keep them light and increase their racing potential. Mounting camels three times their height, the children face the risk of being thrown off and trampled.

In December, Qatar banned the use of children in camel races and said it was preparing to use robot jockeys in 2005.

With the new law and introduction of robot jockeys, "the UAE will have adhered to the international regulations governing camel racing while at the same time preserving the traditional character of camel races as a popular local heritage," said Sheikh Sultan bin Hamdan al-Nahayan, a senior official.

"Unlike the human jockey, the robot is cheaper to maintain and would not have to undergo the same physical hardship that humans would," he said.
Pauly
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Pauly »

I think that's brilliant
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

more here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4430851.stm

brilliant, perhaps, but it's bloody INSANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

*SPLUTTER*

Image
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

What the flying fuck?!
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Pauly
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Pauly »

It's insane yeah, but I am all in favour of anything that makes any kind of sport totally hilarious to watch.

It will also take away all the over paid sports stars. Replace them all with puppets. Genius.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

stupid rag heads
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Doombrain wrote:stupid rag heads
I can't wait until all the oil's gone.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

they'll still have shit loads of sand
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

I'm hearing the NHL is on the same track.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Doombrain wrote:they'll still have shit loads of sand
Indeed. They'll remain a smelly, economic powerhouse in the world sand market.
zeeko
Posts: 865
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2000 7:00 am

Post by zeeko »

Grudge wrote:NHL
:icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19:
LOL INTERNET
Posts: 721
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:08 pm

Post by LOL INTERNET »

THE LESS RAGHEADS THE BETTER. COMING OVER HERE STEALING OUR CAMELS. FUCK EM
Post Reply