Junkie wrote:The PSP is a system for losers with no friends. Really. Who spends that kind of money on a game machine that they can only play with themselves with? I play games with friends, where one copy of the disc provides fun for us all.
Heh, maybe that should be the PSPs new slogan: Play with yourself.
Junkie wrote:The PSP is a system for losers with no friends. Really. Who spends that kind of money on a game machine that they can only play with themselves with? I play games with friends, where one copy of the disc provides fun for us all.
Heh, maybe that should be the PSPs new slogan: Play with yourself.
Junkie wrote:So, Vrai, both you and your friends are losers then. Simple. For the rest of the world, gaming is a social activity.
Don't give me the line about jobs, either. I could buy the PSP with money from my freaking coin dish. Let's see. For multiplayer PSP action, you need two PSPs, and two copies of the game in question. That's 600 bucks. Nice use of your disposable income. I'll get a PS2, some wireless controllers, and a bunch of games for that price. With money left over for beer and pizza when the guys come over.
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
How would the playback be? DreamSNES for Dreamcast is overall well done but since its slightly slower, its a real downer on the whole thing IMO. Or is this not the case here (an issue of whether or not the hardware is powerful enough) because the software might be better?
[/edit]