I got a job offer :D

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

I got a job offer :D

Post by mik0rs »

Just thought I'd share that :D

It's as software engineer at a defense-related company, so to say it's fucking with my moral compass a little bit would be an understatement, but unless I'm offered maybe one other job that I'm going for (and providing I'm sufficiently impressed with the place) then I'm probably going to take it.

Go me etc.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Eraser »

concrats mate.
And just because you work at a defense related company doesn't automatically mean you're responsible for bombing citizens to hell.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Post by scared? »

yes it does...
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Good for you. I've had similar moral debates in the recent past when contemplating applying with companies like Raytheon and Boeing. I can't say I wouldn't take the job for enough money, but I don't think I could have worked on missile systems or the like. I think I'd be alright with it if I wasn't designing stuff that directly killed people.
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

Eraser wrote:concrats mate.
And just because you work at a defense related company doesn't automatically mean you're responsible for bombing citizens to hell.
Thanks, I fear that's something I might have to discuss with people from time to time :(

However, the products they make probably will land on citizens from time-to-time unfortunately. If I take that job I would see it as one of the main reasons to do my job to produce my best work all of the time so that happens as little as possible.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Eraser »

Nightshade wrote:I think I'd be alright with it if I wasn't designing stuff that directly killed people.
It's an odd moral question. If you'd be the main brains behind somekind of new missile, people would without a doubt say you're indirectly responsible for deaths in a war.

If you're an accountant for the same company, doing no more than adding and substracting financial numbers, I guess that places you a bit further away from the moral aspects of the company's products.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

scared? wrote:yes it does...
stop paying taxes, youre funding the military.
also, while youre at it, stop building your pension, its being used to develop weapons.

and tell your wife to stop healing people, they're also doing the above.
YOURE ALL EVIL!
diego
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:25 pm

Post by diego »

MKJ wrote:stop paying taxes, youre funding the military.
also, while youre at it, stop building your pension, its being used to develop weapons.

and tell your wife to stop healing people, they're also doing the above.
YOURE ALL EVIL!
LOL OUCH

Good luck, mik0rs - just recently I've had some interviews myself and I'm currently restructuring my career. I say, go for it.
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

Amazing dude!!! We will talk later :)
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

mint, well done mate.
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

Cheers all.

Honestly if I'd taken a universal slating I'd have understood the reasoning, I'm sure I'll get a few in future if I take it. I just hope to fuck I don't have to attend many recruitment events, lol.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

skynet
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

I was thinking the same thing when I was considering if I'd take it if offered, lol.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Eraser wrote:
Nightshade wrote:I think I'd be alright with it if I wasn't designing stuff that directly killed people.
It's an odd moral question. If you'd be the main brains behind somekind of new missile, people would without a doubt say you're indirectly responsible for deaths in a war.

If you're an accountant for the same company, doing no more than adding and substracting financial numbers, I guess that places you a bit further away from the moral aspects of the company's products.
Well, I think it's not too hard to make the argument that if you're employed by a defense contractor, you bear some of the responsibility for people getting blown up. But then again, the same can be said for pretty much every American in at least some fashion.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

They could at least be honerable about their intentions and call themselves offense contractors.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

:olo: fuck off guyblowki :olo:
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

:olo: another nerd slaughtered :olo:
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Nightshade wrote: Well, I think it's not too hard to make the argument that if you're employed by a defense contractor, you bear some of the responsibility for people getting blown up. But then again, the same can be said for pretty much every American in at least some fashion.
Which is the main problem in dismantling the CONGRESSIONAL Military Industrial Complex and makes it impossible to get rid of.

Ah well...you gotta feed your fambly somehoo.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

That's pretty much the crux of all America's problems atm...the people that can fix the current system are the ones that benefit the most from it being broken.
The only way I see things changing is getting a crop of congresscritters in office that don't care about getting re-elected.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

good job mike, congrats.

it's understandable to be a little up in the air on the moral implications - but it's also understandable to want good pay, good benefits, etc for yourself and your (maybe future) family.

i also have problems working for a media organization that doesn't hold up its end of the bargain IMO. i deal with that sometimes too.

but when your job choices are limited (as they always are), you have to take what's best for you, and hope the experience helps you to have better choices in the future.

good luck. :icon14:
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

Thanks, that's the problem when looking for the first career-type job, while there are lots around, they're extremely competetive, and there have been occasions where I'm pretty sure I've done well but someone has bettered me. I'm at the stage where I need to learn and gain experience and that'll open up my options in future. I've not taken it yet though, and there may be other possibilities, we'll see.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

I'd design software that shot people and shit. What's the problem?
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

sounds great things one choice or another

i knew youd need welding googles :up:
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

I don't know the details of your job, but supposing I'm forced to judge the situation despite that, I would probably end up taking the position with some limited reservations.
Pauly
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Pauly »

LOL what you worried about? We only bomb dirty Arabs.
Post Reply