Juelz wrote:I can't believe it either. I'm gonna move to Canada and grow weed. Fuck it. Anyone seen "I Grow Chronic?" Filmed in Beautiful British Columbia?
Haven't seen it but growing is pretty much a provincial hobby here.
Juelz wrote:I can't believe it either. I'm gonna move to Canada and grow weed. Fuck it. Anyone seen "I Grow Chronic?" Filmed in Beautiful British Columbia?
Haven't seen it but growing is pretty much a provincial hobby here.
It's a lil old (eb and flow, drip irrigation) they have newer ways of growing now (dwc) but it is still very good to learn clowning and sexing and stuff. I loved it. Thumbs up for Canada!
[img]http://www.userbars.com/galerie/images/files/3/12/weeduser.jpg[/img]
like clockwork.
hmm.. random pdf posted on a random blog. the pdf contains no metadata that is tracable back to a source except the name of the program it was created with.
But even if they did write it, the JCS are just as much at liberty to write a letter to the editor as you or I.
Dave wrote:But even if they did write it, the JCS are just as much at liberty to write a letter to the editor as you or I.
there's a difference between them writing as individuals and writing in an official capacity as the joint chiefs. in an official capacity it counts as a letter from an arm of the state, which is a different ballgame
Yea, this is far from censoring. But I'd say impropriety is a good word for it.
You don't use JCS letterhead to write a personal opinion letter to the editor. This is an official statement from the Joint Chiefs, about a cartoon.
Now that I think on it though, impropriety isn't a good word for it either. They just completely missed the point of the cartoon, and misunderstood it to be taking pot-shots at wounded soldiers, which is the exact opposite of the statement the cartoon was trying to make -- that our government is kicking wounded soldiers when they're down, not our newspapers.
TBH I'm blown away by the idea that our Joint Chiefs could miss the obvious meaning of such a simple cartoon. Especially with the "stretched thin" remark at the bottom.
Dave wrote:But even if they did write it, the JCS are just as much at liberty to write a letter to the editor as you or I.
there's a difference between them writing as individuals and writing in an official capacity as the joint chiefs. in an official capacity it counts as a letter from an arm of the state, which is a different ballgame
also: geoff is over-reacting. moron alert?
no there's not.. freedom of speech is freedom of speech. you can't start making rules about who can say what.
Oh and before anyone brings it up, I realize I'm walking a fine line between the Sheehan thing and this. The only reason the Sheehan thing evoked a bit of skepticism on my part was that I thought the Capitol had a business casual dress code for the public in the galleries.