Quake3World

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:20 am**

It's out in UK now isn't it? Anyone seen it? Any good?

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:26 am**

not going based on the previews, looks shite.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:44 am**

Pretty good I thought, didnt judge it on Jacksons previous work. Pretty entertaining.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:48 am**

Great adventure movie...dident feel like 3h 8m in the cinema, time flies.
Recomend it highly! :icon14:

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:04 am**

Excellent Flick!

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:10 am**

Absolutely sucked....

What I got out of it:
-Dinosaur pile
-shitty acting and dialogue
-overdone

That's about the gist of it. I thought Peter Jackson made a good looking film, but the rest of it pretty much blew goat chunks. I mean, Kong can kill three tyranosaurus rex dudes (getting huge ass teeth in the arm, legs, foot, etc), but then get disabled by a harpoon....no fucking way. They basic physics were all kinds of fucked up.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:11 am**

OMG HE DIES!

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:51 am**

how bad could it be?
we've all seen the adds on tv, what you see is what you get.
it's king kong you know how it ends, who the fuck is gonna crit the movie up to movie crit standards?
i'd say go see it and marvel at the spectacle of it and don't worry about it if some chump at q3world has sand in his vagina and doesn't like it, you'll probably like it and have a good time

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:27 am**

Dukester wrote:how bad could it be?
we've all seen the adds on tv, what you see is what you get.
it's king kong you know how it ends, who the fuck is gonna crit the movie up to movie crit standards?
i'd say go see it and marvel at the spectacle of it and don't worry about it if some chump at q3world has sand in his vagina and doesn't like it, you'll probably like it and have a good time

Its not even a spectacle. All the "effects" have been done already, and they made it just a ridiculous experience as opposed to an expic one, or one that would wow you. It was ridiculously overdone...

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:36 am**

The overwhelming majority of reviews for the film have been positive.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:09 am**

I think this film was going to be "good" regardless. It seems folks are under the mindset because its King Kong, and because its Peter Jackson who brought us The Lord of the Rings, it will be good. IMO they could have done a great job with it, and they were close to the right thing, but it just didnt cut it. Scenes were too long, characters' reactions to events were absolutely not right, and the physics were just plain stupid especially since they attempted to do them correctly in some areas of the film.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:15 am**

It's over 3 hours long? wow

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:30 am**

It's a great movie. Don't let Canis ruin it for you, he has no taste

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:13 pm**

Canis wrote:Absolutely sucked....

What I got out of it:
-Dinosaur pile
-shitty acting and dialogue
-overdone

That's about the gist of it. I thought Peter Jackson made a good looking film, but the rest of it pretty much blew goat chunks. I mean, Kong can kill three tyranosaurus rex dudes (getting huge ass teeth in the arm, legs, foot, etc), but then get disabled by a harpoon....no fucking way. They basic physics were all kinds of fucked up.

Hey retard, IT'S A FUCKING MOVIE!!!

So the fact that the big ape gets taken down by a harpoon bothers you because it's unrealistic?
LoL but you have no problem stomaching a 30ft gorilla, giant insects, and dinosaurs?

BWAHAHAHA

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:22 pm**

Settle down spaz. As you yourself said, 'it's a movie'.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:32 pm**

Foo wrote:Settle down spaz. As you yourself said, 'it's a movie'.

You can't handle my superior logical ownage.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:37 pm**

sounds like canis is a moron...

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:42 pm**

Freakaloin wrote:sounds like canis is a moron...

should we trigger the moron alert, or wait until he comes back with a moronic comment?

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:09 pm**

he'll do the moronics all by himself...

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:20 pm**

Jackal wrote:
Canis wrote:Absolutely sucked....

What I got out of it:
-Dinosaur pile
-shitty acting and dialogue
-overdone

That's about the gist of it. I thought Peter Jackson made a good looking film, but the rest of it pretty much blew goat chunks. I mean, Kong can kill three tyranosaurus rex dudes (getting huge ass teeth in the arm, legs, foot, etc), but then get disabled by a harpoon....no fucking way. They basic physics were all kinds of fucked up.
Hey retard, IT'S A FUCKING MOVIE!!!

So the fact that the big ape gets taken down by a harpoon bothers you because it's unrealistic?
LoL but you have no problem stomaching a 30ft gorilla, giant insects, and dinosaurs?

BWAHAHAHA

Hey fucknut. I was talking about relevant physics you pathetic fool. It is a fucking movie, but it fucking sucked IMO. They could have made it great, but they didnt for quite obvious reasons. The dinosaur pile was ridiculous, and stuff like that distanced you instead of sucking you in and getting you involved. The same crap happened in the sequels to "The Mummy", for example (the "scorpion king" was pathetic). It just seemed they were pimping their graphics, and in doing so let real-world physics and basic human reactions/interactions take a nose dive. They could have done a much better job in bringing this fantasy to life, but they goofed it all up. Cheezy lines, bad physics, and overdone scenes ruined it for me.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:30 pm**

Idiot

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:42 pm**

lol bad physics is called having an impossibly large ape.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:46 pm**

I have bad physics in my pants.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:47 pm**

And by that I mean my knee attracts the moon.

Posted: **Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:17 pm**