King Kong

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

King Kong

Post by DRuM »

It's out in UK now isn't it? Anyone seen it? Any good?
S@M
Posts: 1889
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:11 am

Post by S@M »

not going based on the previews, looks shite.
"Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name."
ek
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:03 am

Post by ek »

Pretty good I thought, didnt judge it on Jacksons previous work. Pretty entertaining. :drool:
reefsurfer
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am

Post by reefsurfer »

Great adventure movie...dident feel like 3h 8m in the cinema, time flies.
Recomend it highly! :icon14:
-SKID-
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 7:00 am

Post by -SKID- »

Excellent Flick!
Where Do You Find a Dog With No Legs?
>Right Where You Left Him.
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

Absolutely sucked....

What I got out of it:
-Dinosaur pile
-shitty acting and dialogue
-overdone

That's about the gist of it. I thought Peter Jackson made a good looking film, but the rest of it pretty much blew goat chunks. I mean, Kong can kill three tyranosaurus rex dudes (getting huge ass teeth in the arm, legs, foot, etc), but then get disabled by a harpoon....no fucking way. They basic physics were all kinds of fucked up.
Last edited by Canis on Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
SOAPboy
Posts: 8268
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:00 am

Post by SOAPboy »

OMG HE DIES!
[size=75][i]I once had a glass of milk.

It curdled, and then I couldn't drink it. So I mixed it with some water, and it was alright again.

I am now sick.
[/i][/size]
[img]http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3631/171164665735hk8.png[/img]
Dukester
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:13 pm

Post by Dukester »

how bad could it be?
we've all seen the adds on tv, what you see is what you get.
it's king kong you know how it ends, who the fuck is gonna crit the movie up to movie crit standards?
i'd say go see it and marvel at the spectacle of it and don't worry about it if some chump at q3world has sand in his vagina and doesn't like it, you'll probably like it and have a good time :)
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

Dukester wrote:how bad could it be?
we've all seen the adds on tv, what you see is what you get.
it's king kong you know how it ends, who the fuck is gonna crit the movie up to movie crit standards?
i'd say go see it and marvel at the spectacle of it and don't worry about it if some chump at q3world has sand in his vagina and doesn't like it, you'll probably like it and have a good time :)
Its not even a spectacle. All the "effects" have been done already, and they made it just a ridiculous experience as opposed to an expic one, or one that would wow you. It was ridiculously overdone...
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

The overwhelming majority of reviews for the film have been positive.
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

I think this film was going to be "good" regardless. It seems folks are under the mindset because its King Kong, and because its Peter Jackson who brought us The Lord of the Rings, it will be good. IMO they could have done a great job with it, and they were close to the right thing, but it just didnt cut it. Scenes were too long, characters' reactions to events were absolutely not right, and the physics were just plain stupid especially since they attempted to do them correctly in some areas of the film.
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19181
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Eraser »

It's over 3 hours long? wow
r3t
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:58 am

Post by r3t »

It's a great movie. Don't let Canis ruin it for you, he has no taste :p
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

Canis wrote:Absolutely sucked....

What I got out of it:
-Dinosaur pile
-shitty acting and dialogue
-overdone

That's about the gist of it. I thought Peter Jackson made a good looking film, but the rest of it pretty much blew goat chunks. I mean, Kong can kill three tyranosaurus rex dudes (getting huge ass teeth in the arm, legs, foot, etc), but then get disabled by a harpoon....no fucking way. They basic physics were all kinds of fucked up.
Hey retard, IT'S A FUCKING MOVIE!!!

So the fact that the big ape gets taken down by a harpoon bothers you because it's unrealistic?
LoL but you have no problem stomaching a 30ft gorilla, giant insects, and dinosaurs?

BWAHAHAHA
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Settle down spaz. As you yourself said, 'it's a movie'.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

Foo wrote:Settle down spaz. As you yourself said, 'it's a movie'.
You can't handle my superior logical ownage.
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

sounds like canis is a moron...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
glossy
Posts: 2285
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by glossy »

Freakaloin wrote:sounds like canis is a moron...
should we trigger the moron alert, or wait until he comes back with a moronic comment?
Freakaloin
Posts: 10620
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by Freakaloin »

he'll do the moronics all by himself...
a defining attribute of a government is that it has a monopoly on the legitimate exercise of violence...
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

Jackal wrote:
Canis wrote:Absolutely sucked....

What I got out of it:
-Dinosaur pile
-shitty acting and dialogue
-overdone

That's about the gist of it. I thought Peter Jackson made a good looking film, but the rest of it pretty much blew goat chunks. I mean, Kong can kill three tyranosaurus rex dudes (getting huge ass teeth in the arm, legs, foot, etc), but then get disabled by a harpoon....no fucking way. They basic physics were all kinds of fucked up.
Hey retard, IT'S A FUCKING MOVIE!!!

So the fact that the big ape gets taken down by a harpoon bothers you because it's unrealistic?
LoL but you have no problem stomaching a 30ft gorilla, giant insects, and dinosaurs?

BWAHAHAHA
Hey fucknut. I was talking about relevant physics you pathetic fool. It is a fucking movie, but it fucking sucked IMO. They could have made it great, but they didnt for quite obvious reasons. The dinosaur pile was ridiculous, and stuff like that distanced you instead of sucking you in and getting you involved. The same crap happened in the sequels to "The Mummy", for example (the "scorpion king" was pathetic). It just seemed they were pimping their graphics, and in doing so let real-world physics and basic human reactions/interactions take a nose dive. They could have done a much better job in bringing this fantasy to life, but they goofed it all up. Cheezy lines, bad physics, and overdone scenes ruined it for me.
Pauly
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Pauly »

Idiot
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

lol bad physics is called having an impossibly large ape.
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

I have bad physics in my pants.
mik0rs
Posts: 2650
Joined: Wed May 03, 2000 7:00 am

Post by mik0rs »

And by that I mean my knee attracts the moon.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

olol
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
Post Reply