He was socially conservative yes, but also pro-science. I think you're wrong. Wanna bet on it?SplishSplash wrote:I've watched a couple shows about him in the meantime and JP2 was supposed to be pretty conservative already, so I will stand by my first statement.Massive Quasars wrote:Splish you're wrong, his replacement will be more conservative.
The next guy will be more liberal.
The Pope has a high fever
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
that what i heard, only reason why i wouldnt be glad to see the back of himMassive Quasars wrote:He was socially conservative yes, but also pro-science. I think you're wrong. Wanna bet on it?SplishSplash wrote:I've watched a couple shows about him in the meantime and JP2 was supposed to be pretty conservative already, so I will stand by my first statement.Massive Quasars wrote:Splish you're wrong, his replacement will be more conservative.
The next guy will be more liberal.
-
SplishSplash
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
I would, but now I've learned that JP2 picked almost all of the current voting cardinals, and they said it's likely they'll follow his lead.Massive Quasars wrote: He was socially conservative yes, but also pro-science. I think you're wrong. Wanna bet on it?
So now I'm agreeing with you again.
BTW I just read a good quote from Dan Brown's 'Da Vinci Code':
"There is no point in making peace between science and religion. Religion doesn't need science to prove anything. And how is a faithful scientist going to do unbiased research?" (paraphrased)