The Pope has a high fever

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

SplishSplash wrote:
Massive Quasars wrote:Splish you're wrong, his replacement will be more conservative.
I've watched a couple shows about him in the meantime and JP2 was supposed to be pretty conservative already, so I will stand by my first statement.
The next guy will be more liberal.
He was socially conservative yes, but also pro-science. I think you're wrong. Wanna bet on it? :paranoid:
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Post by losCHUNK »

Massive Quasars wrote:
SplishSplash wrote:
Massive Quasars wrote:Splish you're wrong, his replacement will be more conservative.
I've watched a couple shows about him in the meantime and JP2 was supposed to be pretty conservative already, so I will stand by my first statement.
The next guy will be more liberal.
He was socially conservative yes, but also pro-science. I think you're wrong. Wanna bet on it? :paranoid:
that what i heard, only reason why i wouldnt be glad to see the back of him
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Massive Quasars wrote: He was socially conservative yes, but also pro-science. I think you're wrong. Wanna bet on it? :paranoid:
I would, but now I've learned that JP2 picked almost all of the current voting cardinals, and they said it's likely they'll follow his lead.
So now I'm agreeing with you again.

BTW I just read a good quote from Dan Brown's 'Da Vinci Code':
"There is no point in making peace between science and religion. Religion doesn't need science to prove anything. And how is a faithful scientist going to do unbiased research?" (paraphrased)
Post Reply