O'Reilly got one right tonight...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!

Give them money?

 
Total votes: 0

Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Chupacabra wrote:
Dave wrote:
Chupacabra wrote:I take it Dave, that you think theres nothing really "practical" that we can do (unless you're saying that whatever solution there is, its not monetary)? Or maybe we should just try to mix more racially?
If you watched the interview, you can see they want money... not college funds, not health insurance funds. They want cold, hard cash. I'm having sudden visions of a corrupt class action lawsuit that makes a couple of croo.. lawyers a lot of money and a lot of black people still poor.
I guess I kind of felt the topic swayed from that interview you were talking about, but I see what you're saying.

What do you think of the U.S. promising 40 acres and mule to every black family after the civil war and not delivering? Thats where the argument for reparations really starts from.
That's easy.. politicians lie all the time. Everyone knows it. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. Black people have been fooled a lot of times by the US government.

O'Reilly said one other thing I agreed with: If we (christ, i can't believe I typed 'we', how about 'someone' instead) flat out stole legally owned property from a black person, they deserve to get that land back (<a href="http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n1p14_Weber.html">Jewish gold anyone?</a>).
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

tnf wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:
rep wrote:Why is it the fault of the descendants? Why should they be punished?
it's beyond "right and wrong" and "deserve punishment or not"

the idea is that due to the exploitation of blacks in the recent past, a host of benefits have accrued which whites are currently enjoying.

It's not about "punishing"

it's about helping out a segment of the community that is in need.
In need of what? There are plenty of African Americans in need financially for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with slavery. There are many whites in the same boat. Why should one of these 'segments' be helped out instead of the other? My answer is that both segments should be helped - in an ideal world everyone who is in need of something has access to services that address said need, and color of the skin has nothing to do with it.
You're right.

In fact, I remember hearing and agreeing that AA should be based on socio-economic status rather than race.

I guess my concern is that many people don't acknowledge that they are enjoying a lifetime of accrued benefits that came at the expense of slavery.

But there are many whites who are systemically fucked over for other reasons.

Slums should be addressed regardless of whether they're inhabitied by blacks, or others.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

[xeno]Julios wrote:In fact, I remember hearing and agreeing that AA should be based on socio-economic status rather than race.

after reading this thread, it seems that many people here have advocated for AA being based on income rather than race.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

[xeno]Julios wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:In fact, I remember hearing and agreeing that AA should be based on socio-economic status rather than race.

after reading this thread, it seems that many people here have advocated for AA being based on income rather than race.
The funny thing is, I think it's a very sensible and probably the best solution out there. It give minorities an advantage, without getting race invovled. But seeing how obvious it is, there must be something terribly wrong with it since academic circles still debate fiercely about it. tnf said that the issue is 'complicated,' however it looks like I will now have to read a book in order to understand why it is complicated and that economic consideration alone is not enough to fully satisfy academic people.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

[xeno]Julios wrote:
rep wrote:Why is it the fault of the descendants? Why should they be punished?
it's beyond "right and wrong" and "deserve punishment or not"

the idea is that due to the exploitation of blacks in the recent past, a host of benefits have accrued which whites are currently enjoying.

It's not about "punishing"

it's about helping out a segment of the community that is in need.
Bullshit. It's about handouts, excuses, and redistribution of wealth.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

I find it very hard to believe that America's current wealth in an way relates to slavery. Today's America has industry and ip, not sugar cane.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

mjrpes wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:In fact, I remember hearing and agreeing that AA should be based on socio-economic status rather than race.

after reading this thread, it seems that many people here have advocated for AA being based on income rather than race.
The funny thing is, I think it's a very sensible and probably the best solution out there. It give minorities an advantage, without getting race invovled. But seeing how obvious it is, there must be something terribly wrong with it since academic circles still debate fiercely about it. tnf said that the issue is 'complicated,' however it looks like I will now have to read a book in order to understand why it is complicated and that economic consideration alone is not enough to fully satisfy academic people.
I don't mean to pass off the discussion to a book, or to discredit your opinion (which I don't totally disagree with). I am not disagreeing with what you say about the fact that, if we look at the data, there are probably disproportionate numbers of minorities in the situation. What I was addressing are the assumptions we often make, consciously or not, about what a student from a poor household performns like, and what a poor household thinks about education. I think our gut reaction is to picture a kid living in poverty going to a home where the adults are lazy and/or don't care about the kid's education, so we sometimes set lower standards for them, or make other adjustments - all based on that assumption. What I was getting at in terms of the 'complicated' bit is that often our assumptions are dead wrong. Sorry if I came across as condescending or overly academic.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Slavery was an abomination, no doubt about that. As to the current situation, I see no connection between past exploitation and my current economic situation, or how society at large operates/benefits.
As for a disproportionate number of minorities being in poverty, all I have to say is that there are an ENORMOUS number of scholarships, loans, and grants available to any member of ANY minority group. If you belong to a minority and you don't get at least a BS, it's your own damn fault.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

had to look it up, no one really talks about it much over here so only had a vague idea of what was meant by 'reparations' - i guess the american interpretation is more of a financial thing.
Aims and obectives

1. To use all lawful means to obtain Reparations for the enslavement and colonisation of African people in Africa and in the African Diaspora.

2. To use all lawful means to secure the return of African artefacts from whichever place they are currently held.

3. To seek an apology from western governments for the enslavement and colonisation of African people.

4. To campaign for an acknowledgement of the contribution of African people to World history and civilisation.

5. To campaign for an accurate portrayal of African history and thus restore dignity and self-respect to African people.

6. To educate and inform African youth, on the continent and in the Diaspora, about the great African cultures, languages and civilisations.
having done that - in the UK a woman called linda bellos is involved in the reparations movement - so i picked 'no', not for any reason beyond the fact that i hate linda bellos.

she's one of very few people that i've had to stop talking to and walk away from because the urge to wring her scrawny neck until her shit-witted, pus-filled testicle of a head fell off was just too strong.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

Geebs wrote:I find it very hard to believe that America's current wealth in an way relates to slavery. Today's America has industry and ip, not sugar cane.
Nightshade wrote:Slavery was an abomination, no doubt about that. As to the current situation, I see no connection between past exploitation and my current economic situation, or how society at large operates/benefits.
There are a couple ways in which whites enjoy accrued benefits at the expense of black people. The first is one that I am not too well informed of, but it has to do with the phrase: "built on the backs of slaves".

The second is more insidious. It's the idea that as a black person, there are already many things working against you, with respect to systemic oppression, as well as psychic harm. Living in many parts of North America as a black person means that the very way in which your consciousness develops, around key issues, is systematically different from that of white people. The effects of stereotypes upon performance has been well studied within social psychological literature. Even the threat of being stereotyped has dramatic effects.

But I agree that blacks should not be singled out as sole victims of systemic oppression or casualties of the system.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14376
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

plus there's the legal case
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

[xeno]Julios wrote: There are a couple ways in which whites enjoy accrued benefits at the expense of black people. The first is one that I am not too well informed of, but it has to do with the phrase: "built on the backs of slaves".

The second is more insidious. It's the idea that as a black person, there are already many things working against you, with respect to systemic oppression, as well as psychic harm. Living in many parts of North America as a black person means that the very way in which your consciousness develops, around key issues, is systematically different from that of white people. The effects of stereotypes upon performance has been well studied within social psychological literature. Even the threat of being stereotyped has dramatic effects.

But I agree that blacks should not be singled out as sole victims of systemic oppression or casualties of the system.
Sorry man, I don't buy any of that. We live in the now, and Nothing is going to change or put right something that happened a couple hundred years ago. How would you fairly apportion monies anyway? Who pays for it? Sure as hell not going to be my fucking tax dollars. No one in my faimly has ever owned slaves. Besides, it's ridiculous to try and assign dollar figures for nebulous concepts like cultural benefits.
As far as "psychic harm" goes, gimme a fucking break. Talk about a blank check for abdication of personal responsibility. Besides, there are many cases that could be built for such damages if that were to be established as a legal precedent.
"Oh, I feel that I'm athletically inferior to blacks, so give me a fat check."

This is just another inherently divisive racial issue, and nothing good can come of it.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:plus there's the legal case
What legal case would that be?
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

Nightshade wrote:
Sorry man, I don't buy any of that. We live in the now, and Nothing is going to change or put right something that happened a couple hundred years ago. How would you fairly apportion monies anyway? Who pays for it? Sure as hell not going to be my fucking tax dollars. No one in my faimly has ever owned slaves. Besides, it's ridiculous to try and assign dollar figures for nebulous concepts like cultural benefits.
As far as "psychic harm" goes, gimme a fucking break. Talk about a blank check for abdication of personal responsibility. Besides, there are many cases that could be built for such damages if that were to be established as a legal precedent.
"Oh, I feel that I'm athletically inferior to blacks, so give me a fat check."

This is just another inherently divisive racial issue, and nothing good can come of it.
My primary concern is not that reparations be made to blacks. My concern is that society tends to think within very small timescales. There are resonant effects of actions that shape the reality we live in today.

I'm only trying to bring these ideas into awareness.

Here is a good example:

http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/em ... cking.html

an excerpt:
Daily effects of white privilege

I decided to try to work on myself at least by identifying some of the daily effects of white privilege in my life. I have chosen those conditions that I think in my case attach somewhat more to skin-color privilege than to class, religion, ethnic status, or geographic location, though of course all these other factors are intricately intertwined. As far as I can tell, my African American coworkers, friends, and acquaintances with whom I come into daily or frequent contact in this particular time, place and time of work cannot count on most of these conditions.

1. I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time.

2. I can avoid spending time with people whom I was trained to mistrust and who have learned to mistrust my kind or me.

3. If I should need to move, I can be pretty sure of renting or purchasing housing in an area which I can afford and in which I would want to live.

4. I can be pretty sure that my neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me.

5. I can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that I will not be followed or harassed.

6. I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.

7. When I am told about our national heritage or about "civilization," I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.

8. I can be sure that my children will be given curricular materials that testify to the existence of their race.

9. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.

10. I can be pretty sure of having my voice heard in a group in which I am the only member of my race.

11. I can be casual about whether or not to listen to another person's voice in a group in which s/he is the only member of his/her race.

12. I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods which fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser's shop and find someone who can cut my hair.

13. Whether I use checks, credit cards or cash, I can count on my skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability.

14. I can arrange to protect my children most of the time from people who might not like them.

15. I do not have to educate my children to be aware of systemic racism for their own daily physical protection.

16. I can be pretty sure that my children's teachers and employers will tolerate them if they fit school and workplace norms; my chief worries about them do not concern others' attitudes toward their race.

17. I can talk with my mouth full and not have people put this down to my color.

18. I can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty or the illiteracy of my race.

19. I can speak in public to a powerful male group without putting my race on trial.

20. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.

21. I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group.

22. I can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color who constitute the world's majority without feeling in my culture any penalty for such oblivion.

23. I can criticize our government and talk about how much I fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider.

24. I can be pretty sure that if I ask to talk to the "person in charge", I will be facing a person of my race.

25. If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven't been singled out because of my race.

26. I can easily buy posters, post-cards, picture books, greeting cards, dolls, toys and children's magazines featuring people of my race.

27. I can go home from most meetings of organizations I belong to feeling somewhat tied in, rather than isolated, out-of-place, outnumbered, unheard, held at a distance or feared.

28. I can be pretty sure that an argument with a colleague of another race is more likely to jeopardize her/his chances for advancement than to jeopardize mine.

29. I can be pretty sure that if I argue for the promotion of a person of another race, or a program centering on race, this is not likely to cost me heavily within my present setting, even if my colleagues disagree with me.

30. If I declare there is a racial issue at hand, or there isn't a racial issue at hand, my race will lend me more credibility for either position than a person of color will have.

31. I can choose to ignore developments in minority writing and minority activist programs, or disparage them, or learn from them, but in any case, I can find ways to be more or less protected from negative consequences of any of these choices.

32. My culture gives me little fear about ignoring the perspectives and powers of people of other races.

33. I am not made acutely aware that my shape, bearing or body odor will be taken as a reflection on my race.

34. I can worry about racism without being seen as self-interested or self-seeking.

35. I can take a job with an affirmative action employer without having my co-workers on the job suspect that I got it because of my race.

36. If my day, week or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether it had racial overtones.

37. I can be pretty sure of finding people who would be willing to talk with me and advise me about my next steps, professionally.

38. I can think over many options, social, political, imaginative or professional, without asking whether a person of my race would be accepted or allowed to do what I want to do.

39. I can be late to a meeting without having the lateness reflect on my race.

40. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chosen.

41. I can be sure that if I need legal or medical help, my race will not work against me.

42. I can arrange my activities so that I will never have to experience feelings of rejection owing to my race.

43. If I have low credibility as a leader I can be sure that my race is not the problem.

44. I can easily find academic courses and institutions which give attention only to people of my race.

45. I can expect figurative language and imagery in all of the arts to testify to experiences of my race.

46. I can chose blemish cover or bandages in "flesh" color and have them more or less match my skin.

47. I can travel alone or with my spouse without expecting embarrassment or hostility in those who deal with us.

48. I have no difficulty finding neighborhoods where people approve of our household.

49. My children are given texts and classes which implicitly support our kind of family unit and do not turn them against my choice of domestic partnership.

50. I will feel welcomed and "normal" in the usual walks of public life, institutional and social.
User avatar
Survivor
Posts: 4202
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Survivor »

12. I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented
Getting harder here though.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Some of those are valid points, some are goofy generalizations, and some are flat-out bullshit.
For example, to address the "representational" issues: The black population in this country is a little less than 25%. Equality is therefore 1 in 4, not 1 in 2. Some people really don't want to see this point, but as far as fairness goes, it doesn't mush more fair than basing things on numbers alone.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14376
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Interesting. I've never seen it laid out like that, although I still disagree with it.
One thing I'd like to see better explained is the argument in that first link that all the famine, disease, and other nastiness that's plagued Africa was caused by the slave trade.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14376
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

Nightshade wrote:Interesting. I've never seen it laid out like that, although I still disagree with it.
One thing I'd like to see better explained is the argument in that first link that all the famine, disease, and other nastiness that's plagued Africa was caused by the slave trade.
I think they're referring to sub-saharan africa re the famine etc in which case they're talking about reparations from the Dutch, the UK?, and possibly other European nations in those cases.


'The impoverishment of the nations of sub-Saharan Africa, which has led to so much famine, disease, and underdevelopment, has among its major causes the devastation caused by the slave trade. It is true that a minority of Africans collaborated with the slave trade and prospered as a result; but that should not undermine the overall truth that the rape of Africa was the responsibility of the European nations that established and promoted the trade.'
Guest

Post by Guest »

You know it's easy for someone to say that we owe what we have now to those slaves that basicly set us up in a nice position but what people don't seem to understand is I didn't choose to be born white.

Yes, because of slavery our civilization has evolved into what we are today but we aren't responsible and neither are their decendants. Just like they didn't choose to be born in that situation we didnt' choose to be born in ours. Only time can balance things out IF we treat everyone equaly. Racism might continue to be passed down from previous generations but as time goes on even that will hopefully be smothered somewhat but it'll never be gone. There will always be a white person that doesn't like a black person and vice versa. It just won't be as predominant as it is now because it was so recent. Even today racism is definitely not as bad as it was say 30 years ago.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Oh, and until we do something about that whole "slaughtering all the Indians" thing, the slavery reparations movement can hug a root.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14376
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

Nightshade wrote:Oh, and until we do something about that whole "slaughtering all the Indians" thing, the slavery reparations movement can hug a root.
just because one hasn't been dealt with doesn't mean you ignore the other
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

tnf wrote:
mjrpes wrote:
[xeno]Julios wrote:
after reading this thread, it seems that many people here have advocated for AA being based on income rather than race.
The funny thing is, I think it's a very sensible and probably the best solution out there. It give minorities an advantage, without getting race invovled. But seeing how obvious it is, there must be something terribly wrong with it since academic circles still debate fiercely about it. tnf said that the issue is 'complicated,' however it looks like I will now have to read a book in order to understand why it is complicated and that economic consideration alone is not enough to fully satisfy academic people.
I don't mean to pass off the discussion to a book, or to discredit your opinion (which I don't totally disagree with). I am not disagreeing with what you say about the fact that, if we look at the data, there are probably disproportionate numbers of minorities in the situation. What I was addressing are the assumptions we often make, consciously or not, about what a student from a poor household performns like, and what a poor household thinks about education. I think our gut reaction is to picture a kid living in poverty going to a home where the adults are lazy and/or don't care about the kid's education, so we sometimes set lower standards for them, or make other adjustments - all based on that assumption. What I was getting at in terms of the 'complicated' bit is that often our assumptions are dead wrong. Sorry if I came across as condescending or overly academic.
I didn't mean to suggest you were being condescending at all. I fully understand that issues like this are 'complicated', and I don't doubt that they are since academic circles still fully debate them and there are smart people on both sides, blah blah blah. And I fully meant that I would have to read that book by Ruby Payne and others in that field in order to understanding this issue better. Maybe we should invite him for an interview on q3w forums and he could answer our questions.
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Hannibal »

At least in terms of the affirmative action bit, I'm with Cornel West. Cash payouts to individuals are harder for me to swallow.
Last edited by Hannibal on Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Oh, and until we do something about that whole "slaughtering all the Indians" thing, the slavery reparations movement can hug a root.
just because one hasn't been dealt with doesn't mean you ignore the other
It has more to do with my views of the two cultures in America than anything else.
Anyone got any links to research into the parallels between the conditions of blacks and Indians in the US?
Post Reply