Well Valve have got one thing right, that's for sure.

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:album sales were down this past year approximately 7% while single sales increased. Itunes was ranked number 7 as a music retailer - not bad for getting nothing tangible in return.
download sales overall were down (against predicted growth) in 2005 and that trend is expected to continue until the market beds in (which won't be any time soon). the success of itunes as a newcomer to the market (and the effect that's had on other digital distributors) has been weighted for in that expectation.

the us download market is actually weaker than the european market (in terms of actual sales versus predicted sales). physical product (at least for music) will remain the dominant form of distribution on both sides of the pond for the forseeable future.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:the industry is shifting towards selling singles more now than ever before. album sales were down this past year approximately 7% while single sales increased. Itunes was ranked number 7 as a music retailer - not bad for getting nothing tangible in return. most teens don't care about tangibility when it comes to music - they just want it, and want it without having to cruise a brick and mortar.

DRM, as Grudge pointed out, is possibly a reason, but i think that it's more of a gripe, albeit a legitimate one, with nerds, since most folks have no idea what DRM's or rootkits are - but they will.

of course i'm talking about the majority of teens, but i think that this is becoming the trend, unfortunately. top that off with the fact that these digital downloads are of poor quality (128kbps is poor imo) and now you have a ton of kids that don't KNOW that it should and can sound better.

ah, more of the dumbing down of society.
That may be true for music, but those reasons don't translate to software and game sales. Especially software - a lot of people want to go talk to some idiot at a brick-n-mortar who will tell them what they need and how hard it will be to set it up, etc.

I'm not saying that online purchasing won't get huge - but it will still be a little while, and it won't replace storefronts.

I mean, if people really all want to switch to online buying, there wouldn't be any reason for any storefronts at all to exist, because every product can be bought online, from clothing to appliances.

So if your argument's followed out to its logical conclusion, there won't be anything left but maybe malls and restaurants.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

4days wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:album sales were down this past year approximately 7% while single sales increased. Itunes was ranked number 7 as a music retailer - not bad for getting nothing tangible in return.
download sales overall were down (against predicted growth) in 2005 and that trend is expected to continue until the market beds in (which won't be any time soon). the success of itunes as a newcomer to the market (and the effect that's had on other digital distributors) has been weighted for in that expectation.

the us download market is actually weaker than the european market (in terms of actual sales versus predicted sales). physical product (at least for music) will remain the dominant form of distribution on both sides of the pond for the forseeable future.
The success of the ITunes music store can be directly attributed to the success of the iPod, not to a sea change in public attitude towards online shopping.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

Be careful that you distunguish simply buying online with purchasing digital content. They're different.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
plained wrote:yea

no

:olo:
piss off unless you have something relevant to say, idiot.
you never pass up a chance to demonstrare your grade school social mentality do you?

name calling :olo:

plus it is relevant, learn to think
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

R00k wrote:I mean, if people really all want to switch to online buying, there wouldn't be any reason for any storefronts at all to exist, because every product can be bought online, from clothing to appliances.

So if your argument's followed out to its logical conclusion, there won't be anything left but maybe malls and restaurants.
You can't really compare software to clothing and appliances. Traditionally, that has been the business model of both ordinary software companies and game publishers though, selling their products as "packaged goods". But now, Microsoft has realized this, and are moving towards subscription based online services, and the big game publishers are bleeding money on failed AAA titles, while the casual online market is exploding, that is changing. Software is not an appliance.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

R00k wrote:The success of the ITunes music store can be directly attributed to the success of the iPod, not to a sea change in public attitude towards online shopping.
cookie - but it still had to be taken into account when working out the numbers, and juggs had mentioned it specifically in his post so i thought i should in mine.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Foo wrote:Be careful that you distunguish simply buying online with purchasing digital content. They're different.
Grudge wrote:You can't really compare software to clothing and appliances. Traditionally, that has been the business model of both ordinary software companies and game publishers though, selling their products as "packaged goods". But now, Microsoft has realized this, and are moving towards subscription based online services, and the big game publishers are bleeding money on failed AAA titles, while the casual online market is exploding, that is changing. Software is not an appliance.
If the argument is that people's attitudes about online shopping are widely changing, then it's a relevant point.

Also, brick and mortar software stores always carry a lot more than just software, so how are they going to close down without people buying all their other goods online?

Or is the idea that the big software developers will stop supplying storefronts with software to sell?
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

Yes, basically. It will start with them supplying the software online at a lower cost, then it will be subscription based, and you'll have to pay extra if you want a "hard" copy. You might perhaps as a compromize be able to purchase a subscription at a storefront (like you buy xbox live or WoW "coupons" today), and you can go home, download the software and activate the subscription, but if you want a DVD with the software on it, you'll have to pay extra.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

I see what you mean, but you can already get things cheaper if you order them online - including software. Limiting consumer choice isn't a very smart strategy for most companies -- do you think they will start tacking on additional fees to the already more expensive storefront products, to make online purchases more attractive?
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

4days wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:album sales were down this past year approximately 7% while single sales increased. Itunes was ranked number 7 as a music retailer - not bad for getting nothing tangible in return.
download sales overall were down (against predicted growth) in 2005 and that trend is expected to continue until the market beds in (which won't be any time soon). the success of itunes as a newcomer to the market (and the effect that's had on other digital distributors) has been weighted for in that expectation.

the us download market is actually weaker than the european market (in terms of actual sales versus predicted sales). physical product (at least for music) will remain the dominant form of distribution on both sides of the pond for the forseeable future.
I'd sure like to believe you. I hate how the music industry as a whole is looking, not to mention the quality, or lack thereof, in popular music production and business practices.
R00k wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:the industry is shifting towards selling singles more now than ever before. album sales were down this past year approximately 7% while single sales increased. Itunes was ranked number 7 as a music retailer - not bad for getting nothing tangible in return. most teens don't care about tangibility when it comes to music - they just want it, and want it without having to cruise a brick and mortar.

DRM, as Grudge pointed out, is possibly a reason, but i think that it's more of a gripe, albeit a legitimate one, with nerds, since most folks have no idea what DRM's or rootkits are - but they will.

of course i'm talking about the majority of teens, but i think that this is becoming the trend, unfortunately. top that off with the fact that these digital downloads are of poor quality (128kbps is poor imo) and now you have a ton of kids that don't KNOW that it should and can sound better.

ah, more of the dumbing down of society.
That may be true for music, but those reasons don't translate to software and game sales. Especially software - a lot of people want to go talk to some idiot at a brick-n-mortar who will tell them what they need and how hard it will be to set it up, etc.

I'm not saying that online purchasing won't get huge - but it will still be a little while, and it won't replace storefronts.

I mean, if people really all want to switch to online buying, there wouldn't be any reason for any storefronts at all to exist, because every product can be bought online, from clothing to appliances.

So if your argument's followed out to its logical conclusion, there won't be anything left but maybe malls and restaurants.
i was only referring to music.
plained wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
plained wrote:yea

no

:olo:
piss off unless you have something relevant to say, idiot.
you never pass up a chance to demonstrare your grade school social mentality do you?

name calling :olo:

plus it is relevant, learn to think
AA :olo:
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

the diff between fantasy and reality is another thing you cant percieve
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

F5, boy you're quick :olo:
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote: i was only referring to music.
Gotcha. Since the conversation started up about games and software, I assumed you were including them.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

R00k wrote:do you think they will start tacking on additional fees to the already more expensive storefront products, to make online purchases more attractive?
No, they will just charge slightly less for the downloadable version, making a larger profit as there is no retailer who adds his percentage.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

If they make the price difference big enough, they could probably get most people to make the change. I guess it could be a feasible option if/when everyone with a PC has broadband access.
primaltheory
Posts: 623
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:31 am

Post by primaltheory »

Yea I don't see the point of paying the same If I don't get a tangible box, cd/dvd, manual, and any extras that the retail guys get.
Why not?

[i]Jenny: lol, i'm not changing the whole harddrive directory structure for a mod. Do it proper like other mods please.[/i]
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:I'd sure like to believe you. I hate how the music industry as a whole is looking, not to mention the quality, or lack thereof, in popular music production and business practices.
it's a fact, not an opinion. none of the major companies have any plans to invest more money than has already been earmarked for download sales - the numbers just aren't good enough, some are even cutting money for downloads back. where's the real money coming from if all you're ultimately doing is running an FTP? how do you finance new artists? record companies aren't going to change the way their businesses are structured in a matter of years just because the goal posts have moved half an inch.

the music industry as a whole isn't making as much money as it thinks it should be - but that's not because of a change in technology - it's because, like you said, it's run by people who think selling music is no different to selling tyres or loft insulation or bread :(
Post Reply