Quake3World

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Dickhead.

Douchebag

commiedian

Peenyuh wrote:How'z that workin fer yuh

One word in five spelled correctly. Says it all really.

Fender wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5SWQJWm6Tg

The digs at Guilliani are

Peenyuh have you been drinking again?

No sir, I have not.

LawL wrote:

Peenyuh wrote:How'z that workin fer yuh

One word in five spelled correctly. Says it all really.

Yeah but that sentence was badass.

LawL wrote:

Peenyuh wrote:How'z that workin fer yuh

One word in five spelled correctly. Says it all really.

If you want everything to be correct English, with no allowance for 'common speak', then you may want to reevaluate your second sentence, as it has no subject and is, therefore, incorrect.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:He asked a perfectly reasonable question. Can't you back up your beliefs?

The question was loaded with an attack on McCain's policy. Depending on your take of "reasonable", I'd say that's grounds to just avoid the argument. The question itself made it apparent that there would be no useful discussion as a result.

Not saying I disagree with the innuendo of the question, just that the reaction was probably appropriate.

Peenyuh wrote:

Fender wrote:ffs... just answer the question you coward

*sigh*

Foreign policy, more specifically (for this conv), Economic foreign policy should not be based on whether or not the opposing government is nice to it's people or not. Yes, that should be addressed at a later time, but first consideration should be the impact on our own economy. Marshall foreign policy should be reconsidered by both Dems and Reps, really. McCain is of the same insanity as Bush, and IMO, Obama is completely naive. I still haven't heard much on Cultural foreign policy from either one. So, the important difference, to me, is the economic.

Gosh, way to hit me in my courage deficiency.

Lots of words and no content. Sarah Palin writing your posts for you?

Just because the words are a bit big fer yuh, that doesn't mean there's no content.

None of that post had anything to do with Obama's foreign policy as far as I can tell.

creep wrote:If you want everything to be correct English, with no allowance for 'common speak', then you may want to reevaluate your second sentence, as it has no subject and is, therefore, incorrect.

Try a bit harder faggot.

R00k wrote:None of that post had anything to do with Obama's foreign policy as far as I can tell.

Peenyuh wrote:Economic foreign policy should not be based on whether or not the opposing government is nice to it's people or not. Yes, that should be addressed at a later time, but first consideration should be the impact on our own economy.

Alright. If you've been paying attention to what they've both been saying in this area, this statement is clear as a bell. My fault for assuming participants in this conversation were paying attention. Review the campaigns and get back to me.

Peenyuh wrote:Alright. If you've been paying attention to what they've both been saying in this area, this statement is clear as a bell. My fault for assuming participants in this conversation were paying attention. Review the campaigns and get back to me.

I'm interested in your understanding of their positions. You've said nothing that indicates any real reason for your original statement.

I'm gonna go out to eat, I'll give an example when I get back....matter of fact, a comment in the last debate got my attn. Gotta remember it correctly or you'll shred me on it.

The history in Colombia right now is that labor leaders have been targeted for assassination on a fairly consistent basis and there have not been prosecutions.

And what I have said, because the free trade -- the trade agreement itself does have labor and environmental protections, but we have to stand for human rights and we have to make sure that violence isn't being perpetrated against workers who are just trying to organize for their rights, which is why, for example, I supported the Peruvian Free Trade Agreement which was a well-structured agreement.

But I think that the important point is we've got to have a president who understands the benefits of free trade but also is going to enforce unfair trade agreements and is going to stand up to other countries.

Now, on principle, I can agree with with this 100%. However, in practice, I can't get behind Obama in this. I listened at the debate. I've read the transcript three times - and this particular part more than that - and what I'm getting from it is that Obama doesn't even want to consider this trade agreement because of what has happened down there, rather than what is or will be happening. We can't change something if we aren't there to do it. We have to get our foot in the door. We can enforce the labor and environmental protection in these agreements... if we have the agreement in the first place. You have to show the money before the importance of that money becomes apparent to the guy who wants it. "If you don't change this, we'll go somewhere else" hasn't proven to be a solid tactic in world economics because there's always someone else who'll make the deal. If I understand the agreement as stated, the billion dollars we've spent will not be spent again in the future. That's a lot of money that can be better spent here. We are still going to do business with Colombia, so why not cut that chunk of spending out?

First, get the trade. THEN worry about that other stuff.

All that other stuff about " We have to eliminate our dependence....Venezuela...etc" sounds good but is unrealistic. Rhetoric, nothing more.

Keep in mind, when I hear something that sounds reasonable from either candidate, I toss a marble in their cup. Both cups have very few marble in them. Obama has a few more than McCain, but that is like a statistic. It looks like, since Obama has more marbles, he's The Guy. In reality, neither has enough marbles and I am irritated that I have to choose one of them at all instead of someone I can believe in.

Peenyuh wrote:It looks like, since Obama has more marbles, he's The Guy. In reality, neither has enough marbles and I am irritated that I have to choose one of them at all instead of someone I can believe in.

That I can respect. Thanks.

McCain-Obama Dance-Off

http://www.minimovie.com/film-128460-Mc ... 0Dance-Off

Fender wrote:McCain-Obama Dance-Off

http://www.minimovie.com/film-128460-Mc ... 0Dance-Off

QUALITY

she should have called them hosers