Who was bashing anything? Read the thread again, i was saying that its not PPL because of this fact.inolen wrote:This is why you were just recently bashing on the new CoD's "low resolution static lightmaps"?o'dium wrote:I haven't complained in a long time here, because this shit hole went away.
Paul Anderson + Doom 3 = HOLY SHIT LOLZ
My bad.o'dium wrote:Who was bashing anything? Read the thread again, i was saying that its not PPL because of this fact.inolen wrote:This is why you were just recently bashing on the new CoD's "low resolution static lightmaps"?o'dium wrote:I haven't complained in a long time here, because this shit hole went away.
You were just trying to act like you knew something (what is it with people who dabble in photoshop and their egos), when in fact, you were just showing your ignorance yet again.
Ignorance? How was I being ignorant? Again, we all thought CoD2 was using Doom tech, and I said it can't be because its using static lightmaps, you can tell because of how low detail they were.
How is anything there ignorant? O_o
Not that any of this matters, I know you are all fishing, and I’m not gonna bite
How is anything there ignorant? O_o
Not that any of this matters, I know you are all fishing, and I’m not gonna bite

-
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
jesus has this thread been totally messed up. its now about o'diums character and semantics.
anyway, to get back on topic...the point of the matter is that paul anderson fucking sucks. im not talking from a movie creationist point of view or anything. im sure he's much more skilled than i am at handling a camera and junk. im just saying that the principles he has an artist suck. any writer, creator or artist (and the fans of the original), when their work is being transposed to another medium want the new work to be very faithful to the original or atleast have some semblance . certain people do this and they get mad respect...just look at peter jackson. paul anderson on the other hand is a money grubbing whore and has no concept of this whatsoever.
anyway, to get back on topic...the point of the matter is that paul anderson fucking sucks. im not talking from a movie creationist point of view or anything. im sure he's much more skilled than i am at handling a camera and junk. im just saying that the principles he has an artist suck. any writer, creator or artist (and the fans of the original), when their work is being transposed to another medium want the new work to be very faithful to the original or atleast have some semblance . certain people do this and they get mad respect...just look at peter jackson. paul anderson on the other hand is a money grubbing whore and has no concept of this whatsoever.
Holy christ...You guys are bitching about a commercial that you haven't even seen yet for an xbox game...
:icon27:
Are you going to stand up every it comes on the television and be like "OMGWTFBUTTSEKS I CAN'T BELIEVE THOSE FOXERS LET THAT IDIOT DIRECT THE COMMERCIAL! oh wait....its already over..."
:icon27:
Are you going to stand up every it comes on the television and be like "OMGWTFBUTTSEKS I CAN'T BELIEVE THOSE FOXERS LET THAT IDIOT DIRECT THE COMMERCIAL! oh wait....its already over..."
-
- Posts: 17511
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
- GONNAFISTYA
- Posts: 13369
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm
o'dium wrote:Activision, id, who gives a shit. Its common knowledge that id have ZERO knowledge in what they should do. Look at the doom movie, they are the ones that had the final say on that, and look what happened to it.
o'dium wrote:i can still tell the difference between a shit script and a good one, and the one that was handed to them was NOT good.
So yeah, if only they had my "knowledge", maybe then they would of allowed a better film, instead of just remaking Resident Evil.
I'm sorry...but...my only question is: How does any of this affect your personal life that you'd treat it as if someone had kicked the shit out of your mom while you hid under the bed?o'dium wrote: Well, no I don't obviously, but I have the feeling its got something to do with little Billy bob not liking the fact that a film has "hell" in it
But fucking hell, what good is changing Mars to an unknown grassy planet and naming things "Bio Force Gun" instead of BFG? There is zero point to that in my eyes.
You really need to get out.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:06 am
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am
He actually isn't talking shit. Paul WS Anderson is an abortion of a director. HOW CAN ANYONE MAKE A RESIDENT EVIL FILM NOT SCARY????????
Only 1 man can achieve this. Paul WS Anderson. It may only be a commercial, but o'dium is right, it means whoever gave that man a Contract to produce anything is fucking clueless.
Only 1 man can achieve this. Paul WS Anderson. It may only be a commercial, but o'dium is right, it means whoever gave that man a Contract to produce anything is fucking clueless.
Last edited by Pauly on Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.