Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:44 pm
it vibrates my ass when it rings. What more do I need?
get over it faggot, I still own a 3210Freakaloin wrote:guess that cell phone came free with the account? rofl...
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:48 pm
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:56 pm
No no no, you MUST get a phone that you can use for browsing the internet, managing your timeschedule, reading your e-mails AND that can play realtones (while everybody that is above the mental age of 12 puts his/her cellphone on vibrate because they understand that other people have feelings as well)!!Foo wrote:get over it faggot, I still own a 3210Freakaloin wrote:guess that cell phone came free with the account? rofl...
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:00 pm
Shit, really? Damnit.
I just got a new battery for this one and everything ;(
I just got a new battery for this one and everything ;(
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:02 pm
what kind of moron would notice a difference between usb and ps2...I've used ps2 mice for years now and I never really noticed a difference between the two so I stayed with ps2..lol lots of noobs round hereFoo wrote:Unfortunately it's not quite the same as the WGM. The buttons are less responsive and so is the ball. Also not being USB you lose something in the interface (although when I'm used to it, I prefer the lower sample rate of PS2 mice).
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:03 pm
No noticable difference between USB and PS2? lol noob alert.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:05 pm
sample rate?Foo wrote:No noticable difference between USB and PS2? lol noob alert.
lol you fruitloops just don't get it..pathetic
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:06 pm
phoq wrote:it vibrates my ass when it rings. What more do I need?
:olo::olo:Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:13 pm
usb wingmen have a much higher velocity threshold than ps2, from my own testing. I think this is coz USB has more bandwidth. You can flick the mouse faster before you lose signal traction with the USB version. This is even when compared to ps2 @ 200hzDuhard wrote:what kind of moron would notice a difference between usb and ps2...I've used ps2 mice for years now and I never really noticed a difference between the two so I stayed with ps2..lol lots of noobs round hereFoo wrote:Unfortunately it's not quite the same as the WGM. The buttons are less responsive and so is the ball. Also not being USB you lose something in the interface (although when I'm used to it, I prefer the lower sample rate of PS2 mice).
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:13 pm
wheels get in the way when you want a solid middle button.Pext wrote:no wheel, lol
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:16 pm
Plus holding the middle finger on the middle button played a part in making the WGM so stable.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:22 pm
exactly, when held like it's meant to be held, your hand is in the same conformation it would be if it were relaxed while you were asleep.
The fingers are spread apart naturally, which allows each finger to influence the control of the mouse independently.
With most other mice, you either have to use a 2 finger grip to achieve the same spread (sacrificing control because you only have 2 instead of 3 fingers), or you end up with a tightly constricted unit of 3 fingers, which because they're so close together can't function independently.
The fingers are spread apart naturally, which allows each finger to influence the control of the mouse independently.
With most other mice, you either have to use a 2 finger grip to achieve the same spread (sacrificing control because you only have 2 instead of 3 fingers), or you end up with a tightly constricted unit of 3 fingers, which because they're so close together can't function independently.
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:20 pm
wheels are a solid button[xeno]Julios wrote:wheels get in the way when you want a solid middle button.Pext wrote:no wheel, lol
and they too like me own
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:55 pm
wheels are not a solid middle button in the sense that they do not have the same digital responsiveness as a button does.
i use middle button for crouch and i can press it rapidly and accurately.
a wheel would get in the way since i would inadvertantly move the wheel up or down at times.
if i wanted to use wheelup or wheeldown as a button i wouldn't be able to hit it as rapidly as a real button
i use middle button for crouch and i can press it rapidly and accurately.
a wheel would get in the way since i would inadvertantly move the wheel up or down at times.
if i wanted to use wheelup or wheeldown as a button i wouldn't be able to hit it as rapidly as a real button
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:57 pm
[xeno]Julios wrote:wheels are not a solid middle button in the sense that they do not have the same digital responsiveness as a button does.
i use middle button for crouch and i can press it rapidly and accurately.
a wheel would get in the way since i would inadvertantly move the wheel up or down at times.
if i wanted to use wheelup or wheeldown as a button i wouldn't be able to hit it as rapidly as a real button
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:50 am
care to share some elaboration along with your vomit? 