Or, even, try counting up the money America tossed yer sorry-assed country as recently as last year.
LOL welfare states!
[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]
U4EA wrote:Look at all these eurofags running their mouths when it took America to bail their sorry asses out in WW2. Be thankful you're not speaking German while wearing lederhosen and eating bratwurst.
Well, you got peenyis to bite, that should count for something at least.
the piece from boris johnson (linked to on that blog) is a load of bollocks though. he massacred dozens of kids because a woman rejected him for a pakistani? lol?
a lot of people believe in some crazy shit. there's stuff in the average alex jones docuvomit that equals anything breivik came out with in terms of sheer conspiratorial assclownery; difference is, alex jones never crossed the line from virtual mentalism to actual mentalism. there must be millions of people in europe (and the world) who dislike islam/multiculturalism/whatever as much as breivik, but who don't decide to translate their beliefs into a killing spree. so why this guy?
U4EA wrote:Look at all these eurofags running their mouths when it took America to bail their sorry asses out in WW2. Be thankful you're not speaking German while wearing lederhosen and eating bratwurst.
seremtan wrote:there must be millions of people in europe (and the world) who dislike islam/multiculturalism/whatever as much as breivik, but who don't decide to translate their beliefs into a killing spree. so why this guy?
Well, the whole anti islam/multiculturalism/whatever narrative and the rise of the populist parties across europe associated with it is rather new... maybe people who really believe all that stuff and worse are becoming more prone to consider acts of political violence.
uh, timothy mcveigh's beliefs were in the same ballpark as alex jones' and charlie sheen's. sheen may have gone off the deep end, but the only person he's ever likely to kill is himself
my point is that the decision to employ atrocity in the name of a cause is an added 'bolt-on' to the beliefs that provide the 'cause' (i.e. 'cause' in the political sense, not 'cause and effect'). that is to say, it's an extra step not necessarily demanded by the beliefs themselves
unfortunately in europe, the distinction between thought/speech and act is weakly defined; we don't have a 1st amendment (and its associated political culture) to enforce that distinction in a hard and fast way. we should do though
Nightshade wrote:Well, you got peenyis to bite, that should count for something at least.
I read the post as a sarcastic "what-has-america-done-since-then" type of thing. If I fell for a troll... oh well. It's all those third world citizens have. I'm just glad I could make them feel better about themselves.
[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]
Dark Metal wrote:I once fired a gun at a range in America.
True story.
Yeah, we saw the vid. How's the leg?
[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]
andyman wrote:i want to be an extremist at something, what are the quals?
You gotta wrestles dogfish caught offa a pier in Florida.
And win.
[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]