If only they had been equipped with guns to protect themselves.SOAPboy wrote:Shits going crazy. We just had a shooting here in town. 2 Officers dead, for zero reason.
I realize its not a dozen children, But still. Was totally unprovoked.

If only they had been equipped with guns to protect themselves.SOAPboy wrote:Shits going crazy. We just had a shooting here in town. 2 Officers dead, for zero reason.
I realize its not a dozen children, But still. Was totally unprovoked.
At the heart of the push was a massive buyback of more than 600,000 semi-automatic shotguns and rifles, or about one-fifth of all firearms in circulation in Australia. The country’s new gun laws prohibited private sales, required that all weapons be individually registered to their owners, and required that gun buyers present a “genuine reason” for needing each weapon at the time of the purchase. (Self-defense did not count.) In the wake of the tragedy, polls showed public support for these measures at upwards of 90 percent.
What happened next has been the subject of several academic studies. Violent crime and gun-related deaths did not come to an end in Australia, of course. But as the Washington Post’s Wonkblog pointed out in August, homicides by firearm plunged 59 percent between 1995 and 2006, with no corresponding increase in non-firearm-related homicides. The drop in suicides by gun was even steeper: 65 percent. Studies found a close correlation between the sharp declines and the gun buybacks. Robberies involving a firearm also dropped significantly. Meanwhile, home invasions did not increase, contrary to fears that firearm ownership is needed to deter such crimes. But here’s the most stunning statistic. In the decade before the Port Arthur massacre, there had been 11 mass shootings in the country. There hasn’t been a single one in Australia since.
Take that n.igger off the tv, we wanna watch football! @Hester52 @Ty_CoolerThanU
Obama you stupid sand n.igger get off my tv. Your just making the families hurt and miss their kids more and I want to watch football
really? can't even watch sunday night football cuz our n.igger prez has to talk, really?
It goes on forever...I don't want to see some n.ig making a speech, I want to watch the 49ers beat the patriots
Because you're fat and stupid.GONNAFISTYA wrote:Why does the link work in preview but not when posted???
I don't hear you eating your gun. You chicken or something?YourGrandpa wrote:Because you're fat and stupid.GONNAFISTYA wrote:Why does the link work in preview but not when posted???
Cheers.U4EA wrote:Q3W censors the link to replace the n-word with [LOL RACISM]. Mouse over it and you can see.
Really?xer0s wrote:Jesus GFY, you truely need help. And I'm not talking about your social or political views...
HOLY. FUCKING. SHITGONNAFISTYA wrote:Twitter complaints that Obama's speech on the shooting interrupted a football game
etc.
What I find even more retarded is that the people posting the racist complaints about their President giving a speech for the vigil are exactly the people who needed to hear it. Instead, they wanted to watch football.seremtan wrote:HOLY. FUCKING. SHITGONNAFISTYA wrote:Twitter complaints that Obama's speech on the shooting interrupted a football game
etc.
i've long believed that Twitter is the preserve of the terminally moronic and the preciously thin-skinned, but this is a whole new level of unspeakable cretinism
But I can definitely hear you trying to eat away all the years of self hate and life time rejection.GONNAFISTYA wrote: I don't hear you eating your gun. You chicken or something?