Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:01 am
You don't white balance B&W sir
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:02 am
how about whitebalancing it before BWing it
you know what i mean
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:14 am
nooooooooooooooooooo.. white balance is when you normalize the neutral tones in your color photo with the light sources so the colors don't come off too warm (yellowish) or too cold (blueish). You also adjust for green to magenta casts. It's basically the same as adjusting your TV for tint and hue.
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:19 am
oh fuck right.
what am i thinking of then :[
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:21 am
When you think of it, let me know
FanaticX
Posts: 271 Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm
Post
by FanaticX » Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:07 pm
There are purist and there are artist in the world of photography. You can see which side of the fence I lean towards...
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:18 pm
yeah, well, people always ask me if my digital B&W conversions are film
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:28 pm
heh.. ok, one more. I'm going to be late for work because I kept screwing around with this thing not looking at the clock
MKJ
Posts: 32582 Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by MKJ » Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:33 pm
cute
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
mac
Posts: 227 Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by mac » Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:36 pm
would still like to know how you get the speia effect done, tried to get the colors looking like youres (which i like alot) but with no big luck.
as for daves second version.. it looks better than the pure bw but the kids look somehow odd as if they are missing some parts here and there
saturn
Posts: 4334 Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands
Post
by saturn » Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:38 pm
mac wrote: would still like to know how you get the speia effect done, tried to get the colors looking like youres (which i like alot) but with no big luck.
as for daves second version.. it looks better than the pure bw but the kids look somehow odd as if they are missing some parts here and there
If you have iPhoto for the Mac, it's dead easy. Other photo programs will do it easily too. You just chose the sepia effect from the menu, I also tweaked the settings a bit but here's an example
Here's how you do a nice black-white conversion of a colour photo in Photoshop. First convert the colourphoto to grayscale, then you get the Duotone option in the Image>Mode menu. Chose it, PS will ask you for a preset. Goto the PS folder, there's a presets folder with duotones folder. Select the Pantone quadtones. And suddenly your dull grayscale photo has turned into a great BW pic. Example:
brisk
Posts: 3801 Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am
Post
by brisk » Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:43 pm
I made a few adjustments to the colours too to really bring out the "character" of the woods. A little level adjustment, and subtle tweaks to the colour balance and brightness reveal previously unseen detail. Hope you like it.
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
saturn
Posts: 4334 Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands
Post
by saturn » Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:53 pm
It's CHUCKIE!
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:16 pm
No, it's Brian Peppers
FanaticX
Posts: 271 Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm
Post
by FanaticX » Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:08 pm
I don't remember posting these before...have I posted these already? LOL
Some nature stuff...
R00k
Posts: 15188 Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by R00k » Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:36 pm
FX, your photos are amazing. Thanks for posting so many.
Can I request larger versions of any of these for wallpaper use? (I have a widescreen so it's big
)
Doombrain
Posts: 23227 Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am
Post
by Doombrain » Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:42 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
mac
Posts: 227 Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by mac » Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:45 am
i'll join the line! wallpaper version of the first two images in 1920x1200 would be nice !
Doombrain
Posts: 23227 Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am
Post
by Doombrain » Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:15 am
A pano view from my hotel room. taken in P mode so the joins arn't so good.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
JB
Posts: 1030 Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:31 am
Post
by JB » Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:19 am
*stay the fuck outta here with that shit
love, juggz
FanaticX
Posts: 271 Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm
Post
by FanaticX » Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:42 am
Sorry guys..no wallpapers available because:
A) Most of the recent originals are all lost b/c HD crashed and burned(no backup). This includes the three nature shots.
B) The other images are archived on my portable photo storage unit at the office.
C) The film images are scanned for web size so I'm not gonna re-scan.
C) I'm too lazy to look, edit, and upload.
S O R R Y !!
Dave
Posts: 6986 Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am
Post
by Dave » Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:06 pm
I thought the joins were vertical blinds in the window DB.
mac
Posts: 227 Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by mac » Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:38 pm
FanaticX wrote: Sorry guys..no wallpapers available because:
A) Most of the recent originals are all lost b/c HD crashed and burned(no backup). This includes the three nature shots.
B) The other images are archived on my portable photo storage unit at the office.
C) The film images are scanned for web size so I'm not gonna re-scan.
C) I'm too lazy to look, edit, and upload.
S O R R Y !!
:icon23:
werldhed
Posts: 4926 Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am
Post
by werldhed » Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Dave wrote: I thought the joins were vertical blinds in the window DB.
That's what I thought too... Why are there so many of them? Couldn't you get that shot with 3 or 4 photos?
mac
Posts: 227 Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am
Post
by mac » Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:13 pm
:icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23:
my ps skills suck pretty much.. thats the best i can do till mr.x gets of his lazy ass
can't do anything with the frog
as for the panorama, sometimes less images give you a better result