PHOTOS PLEASE

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

You don't white balance B&W sir
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

how about whitebalancing it before BWing it

you know what i mean >:E
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

nooooooooooooooooooo.. white balance is when you normalize the neutral tones in your color photo with the light sources so the colors don't come off too warm (yellowish) or too cold (blueish). You also adjust for green to magenta casts. It's basically the same as adjusting your TV for tint and hue.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

oh fuck right.
what am i thinking of then :[
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

When you think of it, let me know :smirk:
FanaticX
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm

Post by FanaticX »

There are purist and there are artist in the world of photography. You can see which side of the fence I lean towards...
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

yeah, well, people always ask me if my digital B&W conversions are film
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

heh.. ok, one more. I'm going to be late for work because I kept screwing around with this thing not looking at the clock >:E

Image
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

cute
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/Emka+Jee][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Emka+Jee.jpg[/img][/url]
mac
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by mac »

would still like to know how you get the speia effect done, tried to get the colors looking like youres (which i like alot) but with no big luck.

as for daves second version.. it looks better than the pure bw but the kids look somehow odd as if they are missing some parts here and there :D
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

mac wrote:would still like to know how you get the speia effect done, tried to get the colors looking like youres (which i like alot) but with no big luck.

as for daves second version.. it looks better than the pure bw but the kids look somehow odd as if they are missing some parts here and there :D
If you have iPhoto for the Mac, it's dead easy. Other photo programs will do it easily too. You just chose the sepia effect from the menu, I also tweaked the settings a bit but here's an example

Image

Here's how you do a nice black-white conversion of a colour photo in Photoshop. First convert the colourphoto to grayscale, then you get the Duotone option in the Image>Mode menu. Chose it, PS will ask you for a preset. Goto the PS folder, there's a presets folder with duotones folder. Select the Pantone quadtones. And suddenly your dull grayscale photo has turned into a great BW pic. Example:

Image
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Post by brisk »

I made a few adjustments to the colours too to really bring out the "character" of the woods. A little level adjustment, and subtle tweaks to the colour balance and brightness reveal previously unseen detail. Hope you like it.

Image
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

It's CHUCKIE!
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

No, it's Brian Peppers
FanaticX
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm

Post by FanaticX »

I don't remember posting these before...have I posted these already? LOL

Some nature stuff...

Image

Image

Image
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

FX, your photos are amazing. Thanks for posting so many.

Can I request larger versions of any of these for wallpaper use? (I have a widescreen so it's big :p)
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

dave. 200 f1.8 L best canon lens ever?

http://www.waynesthisandthat.com/bestca ... brand.html
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
mac
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by mac »

i'll join the line! wallpaper version of the first two images in 1920x1200 would be nice !
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

A pano view from my hotel room. taken in P mode so the joins arn't so good.

Image
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
JB
Posts: 1030
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:31 am

Post by JB »

*stay the fuck outta here with that shit


love, juggz
FanaticX
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:36 pm

Post by FanaticX »

Sorry guys..no wallpapers available because:

A) Most of the recent originals are all lost b/c HD crashed and burned(no backup). This includes the three nature shots.

B) The other images are archived on my portable photo storage unit at the office.

C) The film images are scanned for web size so I'm not gonna re-scan.

C) I'm too lazy to look, edit, and upload.

S O R R Y !! :p
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

I thought the joins were vertical blinds in the window DB.
mac
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by mac »

FanaticX wrote:Sorry guys..no wallpapers available because:

A) Most of the recent originals are all lost b/c HD crashed and burned(no backup). This includes the three nature shots.

B) The other images are archived on my portable photo storage unit at the office.

C) The film images are scanned for web size so I'm not gonna re-scan.

C) I'm too lazy to look, edit, and upload.

S O R R Y !! :p

:icon23:
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Post by werldhed »

Dave wrote:I thought the joins were vertical blinds in the window DB.
That's what I thought too... Why are there so many of them? Couldn't you get that shot with 3 or 4 photos? :confused:
mac
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by mac »

:icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23: :icon23:

my ps skills suck pretty much.. thats the best i can do till mr.x gets of his lazy ass

Image
can't do anything with the frog :( :(


as for the panorama, sometimes less images give you a better result
Post Reply