Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

seremtan wrote:jesus christ it's like moronics 101 in here

kracus you've managed to regurgitate just about every intellectual fallacy there is here, from the appeal to authority ("philosophers much greater than either of us have pondered it") to the old we-don't-really-know-so-my-idiotic-theory-might-be-correct routine, with all points in between

I'm not appealing to authority I just don't want to regurgitate as you indicated everything they've already discussed on this subject. All I'm saying is that the topic of whether reality is real isn't new and there is no defined answer despite how you morons feel that just discrediting me instead of what I'm saying invalidates what I said which it doesn't.

That's the problem here, I can discuss whatever I want. whether I make sense or don't, it'll always boil down to "Kracus you're stupid etc etc..." yet time and time again, I see many of you twits talking about the same thing agreeing with what I was saying. It's fine to have an opinion either side of the coin you are. Whether it's deterministic or not is fine but if you're argument is you're a moron which it usually is then I simply see you as conceding that you don't know.

I'm not claiming I know either but I do have an opinion.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Κracus wrote:I'm not claiming I know either but I do have an opinion.
And so we're right back to where we started with you not fully understanding something, then forming an opinion based on only some of the facts and dismissing facts that blow your opinion out of the water. So this thread is, for all intents and purposes, another dumb fucking "Kracus thread" © 2000. It's more than apparent you have no understanding at all about the fundamental sciences and are making it up as you go because "it feels right". Fucking truthiness morons never cease to amaze.

Sorry Kracus...but any respect you've gained the last few years from "growing up" and writing fewer incredibly moronic posts day-in day-out has dried up. In the last 10 years of people telling you you don't know what you're talking about and all the knowledge humanity has gained in that time, you've still learned nothing. gg :up:
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by seremtan »

Κracus wrote:Epistemology is far from knocked down. Go educate yourself.
i did: BA, Philosophy & Psychology, Oxford :olo:

but feel free to edjumacate me further on the subject of epistemothingummy with yer folk wisdom and tales from the voodoo lounge
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

I have never dismissed any opinion (there are no facts here) other than the ones that are simply attack on me as a person. Like your last post.

I actually enjoy discussion while you enjoy making yourself feel or seem better by simply discrediting my intellect or simply dismissing something I say without actually backing up your views with any form of logic.

You don't want to talk about it? Then don't is my advice to you. People who ponder deterministic scenarios are likely very depressed and rightly so. Those who believe it should just kill themselves. The fact you have nothing to offer in regards to your stance tells me volumes about how much you've thought on this subject. Normally I'd just let you get away with whatever intellectual quip you've got against me but just know that it's not because I believe you or that I feel bad, it's because I'm a better man on most days. Today I feel like calling you out because I think your being very liberal about your condescending nature because you think you've got some kind of bandwagon on your side.

regardless, you may have a point but you'll never make it be known with the gibberish you choose to focus on.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

seremtan wrote:
Κracus wrote:Epistemology is far from knocked down. Go educate yourself.
i did: BA, Philosophy & Psychology, Oxford :olo:

but feel free to edjumacate me further on the subject of epistemothingummy with yer folk wisdom and tales from the voodoo lounge
Ah yes, the classic I have a papers that make me smart argument. LOVE that one. :dork:

I think Jackal might have an opinion on how great those are.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by seremtan »

uh, you just suggested i should go educate myself on the subject of epistemology. i was just pointing out that i had in fact already done so formally

what's your point?
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Κracus wrote:You don't want to talk about it? Then don't is my advice to you.
lol...the original discussion was about copying yourself into a computer and what that would mean, which I'll gladly discuss.

What I will not do is spend the next 3 hours pointing out exactly where your logic goes wrong on this new hippie-based topic that you want to discuss.
Κracus wrote:People who ponder deterministic scenarios are likely very depressed and rightly so. Those who believe it should just kill themselves. The fact you have nothing to offer in regards to your stance tells me volumes about how much you've thought on this subject.
:rolleyes:

I have lots to offer, all of it "reality-based" and - unlike your argument or whatever argument you'd probably present - none of it based on my opinion. Besides, every single person on this board has had the fruitless experience of trying to talk sense to you and I'd rather watch paint dry.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

seremtan wrote:uh, you just suggested i should go educate myself on the subject of epistemology. i was just pointing out that i had in fact already done so formally

what's your point?
The point is all yer book lernin automatically disqualifies you from a Kracus-based discussion on the universe.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

seremtan wrote:uh, you just suggested i should go educate myself on the subject of epistemology. i was just pointing out that i had in fact already done so formally

what's your point?
That post was directed at GKY.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Κracus wrote:You don't want to talk about it? Then don't is my advice to you.
lol...the original discussion was about copying yourself into a computer and what that would mean, which I'll gladly discuss.

What I will not do is spend the next 3 hours pointing out exactly where your logic goes wrong on this new hippie-based topic that you want to discuss.
Κracus wrote:People who ponder deterministic scenarios are likely very depressed and rightly so. Those who believe it should just kill themselves. The fact you have nothing to offer in regards to your stance tells me volumes about how much you've thought on this subject.
:rolleyes:

I have lots to offer, all of it "reality-based" and - unlike your argument or whatever argument you'd probably present - none of it based on my opinion. Besides, every single person on this board has had the fruitless experience of trying to talk sense to you and I'd rather watch paint dry.


That's fine and I likely already know what you'd say anyway which is why we differ on opinion in regards to the transfer of consciousness to a technological device as opposed to a copy.

You seem to be in a deterministic mindset which means it can't be done whilst I'm more Pantheistic which offers that flexibility. To summarize.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by mrd »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Κracus wrote:This is where the beyond comprehension factor sets in. I suspect we'll discover the true nature of consciousness in 2045. I suspect our entire universe is a result of this consciousness thus the implications of that encompass what you're talking about but are so trivial they won't be much of a concern at this point.
Are you one of those people who take the hippie thing way too far and profess that the universe exists only because of consciousness? That there'd be no universe if it wasn't observed?

If so, seriously...put the crack pipe down.
You should go read a book called The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot. While it's quite far-fetched (touches on a lot of stuff Kracus is talking about), he does make a pretty compelling case for a lot of strange ideas. Whether or not the Universe is a construct of the human consciousness is a pretty hard thing to justify or explain but there are clues that point to something reminiscent of this. The idea of aliens throws a pretty big wrench into this line of reasoning though. Are aliens our own construct or do they help shape what we see? Or is their influence unknown to us because we've never formally "met" them? I think it ties somewhat into string theory, although I can't say that for a certainty because I haven't done much reading on string theory (and what I have read has mostly made my brain leak out my fuckin' ears :olo:) But he talks about that underlying idea that everything (IE: elementary particles) is manifested from wave-like patterns/interferences set in different frequencies.

The book talks a bit about how the human body is basically just a giant frequency-sensor. Vision and hearing are the most obvious ones, but it talks about the other senses as well. Also talks about how even simple human motion has a sinusoidal quality to it, like a person ambling along, or dancing.

The weirdest part of that book for me was when it talked about people who could perceive auras, do instantaneous healing/diagnosis based on these, or people who could materialize things out of thin air. The book also talks about one girl with a condition called inedia, whereby she could sustain herself perfectly without eating, ever. In fact, she was put to the test, and a group of scientists lived with her for a week and they observed she ate absolutely nothing and only had one bowel movement (only bile.) Apparently she lived for another 35 years like this. Again, most of these stories would be hard to prove, but they do point to some pretty strange things.

Somewhat similar to the study Kracus mentioned, there was another study where two people who were accomplished hypnotists hypnotized each other and created their own world where their consciousnesses were sort of "floating" about and they had to "construct" bodies for themselves. I think they said they were floating along a beach of some sort. After they were un-hypnotized they were so shaken by the experience that they dropped out of further studies. Now, maybe this is just some hippy LSD bullshit, but what if it isn't? This kind of thing is awfully fucking hard to grasp or explain without some sort of inclination toward a human consciousness-based/controlled universe.

At any rate, I still think a copying of human minds into computers will be a pretty interesting avenue. There is, of course, the other idea that eventually computers will supersede our abilities and simply wipe us out as soon as they perceive us a threat. A new, global, computer-based consciousness. Interesting times ahead. I still think we need to get off this planet and start terra-forming or cultivating another space. We're nearing the end of our rope here. It's sad to see so much of the human race locked in barbaric, cave-man style bullshit. Let's make like the ants, work like a colony, take over this fucking solar system. How many thousands of years do we need? The time is now...
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

I should read that book...
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by seremtan »

Κracus wrote:
seremtan wrote:uh, you just suggested i should go educate myself on the subject of epistemology. i was just pointing out that i had in fact already done so formally

what's your point?
That post was directed at GKY.
no it wasn't. you quoted me
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by seremtan »

Κracus wrote:You seem to be in a deterministic mindset which means it can't be done whilst I'm more Pantheistic which offers that flexibility.
the two aren't mutually exclusive
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Ah I see...the universe didn't exist until human brains became aware of it....regardless of the fact that humans first needed a universe that could support life before they could be created within it...but the universe didn't exist yet...or sumthin. :dork:

So what you guys are saying is that for algae, trees, corn and any other entity that is indeed alive but doesn't have sensory perception, the universe doesn't exist? That aliens, because we haven't "met them" don't exist? Does this mean that gravity didn't exist until an apple fell on Newton's head? That the Higgs boson wasn't real because we hadn't yet discovered it? No chemical processes? No physical processes? No quantum fluctuations? Nothing? That there is no chance that those things existed before we noticed them?

Are you people fucking retarded?

This entire argument smacks of pseudo-science and bong hits and, like religion, is laughable in its attempt to explain the universe. And as I've already mentioned, it is in no way surprising that this "theory" is firmly human-centered.

Image
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

seremtan wrote:
no it wasn't. you quoted me

It wasn't quoted and you posted before I did in reply to GKY. It really was directed at GKY. Congrats on your education though, despite my thoughts on the value of having a piece of paper that says you know something, knowing something itself is worthwhile.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Ah I see...the universe didn't exist until human brains became aware of it....regardless of the fact that humans first needed a universe that could support life before they could be created within it...but the universe didn't exist yet...or sumthin. :dork:

So what you guys are saying is that for algae, trees, corn and any other entity that is indeed alive but doesn't have sensory perception, the universe doesn't exist? That aliens, because we haven't "met them" don't exist? Does this mean that gravity didn't exist until an apple fell on Newton's head? That the Higgs boson wasn't real because we hadn't yet discovered it? No chemical processes? No physical processes? No quantum fluctuations? Nothing? That there is no chance that those things existed before we noticed them?
you're incorrectly assuming when I talk about consciousness I'm talking about the resulting experience you perceive because of chemical reactions within your brain. That is the ego you're talking about and frankly the ego is so self centered that I would expect the type of reaction you're exhibiting from an egoic mind. It's ironic given the type of insults you're using about being narcissistic...

As I've mentioned several times now, you sound deterministic. That word, sums up everything you've said thus far so to explain how your mind isn't JUST a result of chemical reactions that occur within your mind, spine and general physical body is fairly pointless to someone who lives in denial.

You can make a robot and over time, add functions to that robot to make it more and more elaborate but in the end. It's a robot. you're not.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Κracus wrote:
GONNAFISTYA wrote:Ah I see...the universe didn't exist until human brains became aware of it....regardless of the fact that humans first needed a universe that could support life before they could be created within it...but the universe didn't exist yet...or sumthin. :dork:

So what you guys are saying is that for algae, trees, corn and any other entity that is indeed alive but doesn't have sensory perception, the universe doesn't exist? That aliens, because we haven't "met them" don't exist? Does this mean that gravity didn't exist until an apple fell on Newton's head? That the Higgs boson wasn't real because we hadn't yet discovered it? No chemical processes? No physical processes? No quantum fluctuations? Nothing? That there is no chance that those things existed before we noticed them?
you're incorrectly assuming when I talk about consciousness I'm talking about the resulting experience you perceive because of chemical reactions within your brain. That is the ego you're talking about and frankly the ego is so self centered that I would expect the type of reaction you're exhibiting from an egoic mind. It's ironic given the type of insults you're using about being narcissistic...

As I've mentioned several times now, you sound deterministic. That word, sums up everything you've said thus far so to explain how your mind isn't JUST a result of chemical reactions that occur within your mind, spine and general physical body is fairly pointless to someone who lives in denial.

You can make a robot and over time, add functions to that robot to make it more and more elaborate but in the end. It's a robot. you're not.
Oh so now you're changing what your interpretation of "consciousness" is?

You give utterly foolish arguments with no evidence or even a coherent argument presented in any form and you expect me to discuss them in way that doesn't make me laugh? Not a chance.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Κracus wrote:I should read that book...
Here's a thought: How about reading a science book?
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Tsakali »

you said there wouldn't be any maths >:(
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by Κracus »

seremtan wrote:
Κracus wrote:You seem to be in a deterministic mindset which means it can't be done whilst I'm more Pantheistic which offers that flexibility.
the two aren't mutually exclusive

How would an entity who's free will is dependant on a physical body be capable of transfering that information? I mean, the question itself is pointless because we already know the natural body doesn't function like this anyway... Determinism is wrong, in my humble opinion.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by mrd »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Ah I see...the universe didn't exist until human brains became aware of it....regardless of the fact that humans first needed a universe that could support life before they could be created within it...but the universe didn't exist yet...or sumthin. :dork:

So what you guys are saying is that for algae, trees, corn and any other entity that is indeed alive but doesn't have sensory perception, the universe doesn't exist? That aliens, because we haven't "met them" don't exist? Does this mean that gravity didn't exist until an apple fell on Newton's head? That the Higgs boson wasn't real because we hadn't yet discovered it? No chemical processes? No physical processes? No quantum fluctuations? Nothing? That there is no chance that those things existed before we noticed them?

Are you people fucking retarded?

This entire argument smacks of pseudo-science and bong hits and, like religion, is laughable in its attempt to explain the universe. And as I've already mentioned, it is in no way surprising that this "theory" is firmly human-centered.

images
Not sure if you're directing at me or Kracus or both of us. I don't think the Universe was created by consciousness, merely that there is some strange evidence that points to that theory. It's fantastical idea, and there are some interesting tidbits of information surrounding it that I have a hard time knowing how to digest. It's a way of looking at some things, but it certainly has large holes in it, depending on how far you're willing to stretch the notion. However, I would say that there is a certain element of "togetherness" in the collective human consciousness. It's more likely that that collective consciousness will change how we perceive what is there, rather than actually giving birth to it. I think it's also more likely that our collective consciousness is better geared at changing how we operate as a whole, rather than how we interact individually with the Universe.

It would be useful, I think, for more people to spend time on helping/healing/building/exploring and less time on raping, pillaging and all that fun stuff. Can't everyone just get along, fuck? Look, we just landed a rover on Mars... that's some pretty cool shit. Let's do more of that.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by seremtan »

Κracus wrote:...despite my thoughts on the value of having a piece of paper that says you know something, knowing something itself is worthwhile.
you mean to say i learned something to go with my piece of paper?

hot diggety!
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

mrd wrote:Not sure if you're directing at me or Kracus or both of us.
I was directing at anyone who'd SERIOUSLY present the argument you did. I don't think you believe that tripe and I realize you were simply "putting it out there" but I'm afraid I have to point out that "only putting it out there" is how lots of discussions that SHOULDN'T have gone into crazyland ultimately end up in crazyland. And in most cases the detour is a waste of time.
mrd wrote:It would be useful, I think, for more people to spend time on helping/healing/building/exploring and less time on raping, pillaging and all that fun stuff. Can't everyone just get along, fuck? Look, we just landed a rover on Mars... that's some pretty cool shit. Let's do more of that.
I fully appreciate what you're trying to say, so let me explain what I'm trying to say:

- Discussing pseudo-science with a "believer" is no more fun than discussing politics with Sarah Palin because in both scenarios you ultimately end up wanting to nuke all the stupid people out of existance. That'd be bad...nuclear fallout, etc and that might hurt the non-stupid people.

- While I know it can be counter-productive sometimes, I find the best way to stop stupidity in its tracks is to make fun of it. In any normal person, being laughed at will piss them off, but can also motivate them to educate themselves on the subject so they fare better next time. Most people with any sense of self-esteem want to improve themselves. Unfortunately, there are those that will do the opposite and resentfully engulf themselves deeper into the stupid...and I find that I not only don't care about those people, but can't. For example, I keep bashing xer0s about black holes in the hope that he'll actually learn something about them so he can one day righteously tell me to fuck off, and do it with facts. He thinks I hate his guts, but he's simply wrong.

- Regarding your comment about the rover on Mars... :up: I think we can both agree that the level of physics, chemistry, engineering and math calculations needed to pull that off without a hitch had absolutely NOTHING to do with best guesses or best hopes or the fact that we imagined it into being. It took actual fucking effort and brains to do it and it does indeed piss me off that people can denounce proper education as "gettin a piece of paper that says yer smart" and have those same people think they should be taken seriously when all they do is make retarded pronouncements about stuff they barely understand. Kracus learned a new word..."determinism" and now he thinks that there's a good argument the universe never existed before humanity was born. We just discovered a new elementary particle, landed a nuke-powered science lab on another planet and yet there are so many who think that it's either fake or magic. And if you tried to explain it to them there's a good chance alot of them still won't undrestand or care. That's just fucking sad in the 21st century.
TruthfulLiar
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:05 am

Re: Just remember folks, I called this. immortality.

Post by TruthfulLiar »

tl;dr y'all but here's my two bits

consciousness (ie: brain, mind, thoughts, etc... "us") is here, created somehow by some underlying thing that we consider synaptic connections and sensory input and output - and our thoughts are things, matter, and matter or energy must be conscious in some form or fashion in order for us to be conscious; that is not to say or to confuse conscious with aware and intent.
Post Reply