george galloway conspiracy
george galloway conspiracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway
okay, so i'm sounding like geoff - but this one bugs me. i remember just after the invasion of iraq, there was some newspaper reporter on tv claiming to have found documents proving that george galloway had taken backhanders from saddam.
george galloway was one of the most vocal opponents of the invasion of iraq (can find out more about him in the wikipedia link above), so it seemed a bit odd when this hopeless little pissflap of a man said that he'd been bravely digging around the ruins of an embassy in iraq and happened to find this 'evidence' against george galloway.
the evidence in question was found to be forged, as was the evidence in another case against him, brought by the christian science monitor.
now, a day or so after winning a local election on an anti-iraq ticket, he's being accused by the us senate of taking backhanders from iraq again - apparently without any evidence at all.
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,3 ... 08,00.html
okay, so i'm sounding like geoff - but this one bugs me. i remember just after the invasion of iraq, there was some newspaper reporter on tv claiming to have found documents proving that george galloway had taken backhanders from saddam.
george galloway was one of the most vocal opponents of the invasion of iraq (can find out more about him in the wikipedia link above), so it seemed a bit odd when this hopeless little pissflap of a man said that he'd been bravely digging around the ruins of an embassy in iraq and happened to find this 'evidence' against george galloway.
the evidence in question was found to be forged, as was the evidence in another case against him, brought by the christian science monitor.
now, a day or so after winning a local election on an anti-iraq ticket, he's being accused by the us senate of taking backhanders from iraq again - apparently without any evidence at all.
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,3 ... 08,00.html
Last edited by 4days on Thu May 12, 2005 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I read the BBC article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4538735.stm
Had to laugh at this:
And he blasted the Senate investigation, which he said had never written to him, spoken to him, or responded to his offers to testify.
"This cannot possibly be called an investigation," he said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4538735.stm
Had to laugh at this:
And he blasted the Senate investigation, which he said had never written to him, spoken to him, or responded to his offers to testify.
"This cannot possibly be called an investigation," he said.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Galloway seems to be some sort of stupidity magnet. Anyone see Paxman asking him on election night "if he felt proud of having ousted one of the few black women MPs in parliament"? Fucking inane question.
Still waiting for Paxo to ask Blair if he "feels proud to have participated in the slaughter of 700,000 Iraqi children (1.8m Iraqis in total) during sanctions and a further 18,000-100,000 during the recent war".
But I won't hold my breath.
Still waiting for Paxo to ask Blair if he "feels proud to have participated in the slaughter of 700,000 Iraqi children (1.8m Iraqis in total) during sanctions and a further 18,000-100,000 during the recent war".
But I won't hold my breath.
just watched it - it's linked on the top-right of this page:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4539429.stm
lol, paxman gets really stroppy. not sure how relevant it is to have that tory knob in the clip after him, seems very keen to turn it into a race issue. also a bit out of order the way paxman quotes galloway's response to something oona king said without including her part (she mentions her own race).
not saying that galloway's totally in the right - he's a bit of a shadey bugger and his campaign seems irresponsible in a local-political sense - but let's face it, what would paxman's career be worth if he was anything less than scathing to the guy?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4539429.stm
lol, paxman gets really stroppy. not sure how relevant it is to have that tory knob in the clip after him, seems very keen to turn it into a race issue. also a bit out of order the way paxman quotes galloway's response to something oona king said without including her part (she mentions her own race).
not saying that galloway's totally in the right - he's a bit of a shadey bugger and his campaign seems irresponsible in a local-political sense - but let's face it, what would paxman's career be worth if he was anything less than scathing to the guy?
-
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
interesting little commentary on Paxman by Pilger...seremtan wrote:Galloway seems to be some sort of stupidity magnet. Anyone see Paxman asking him on election night "if he felt proud of having ousted one of the few black women MPs in parliament"? Fucking inane question.
Still waiting for Paxo to ask Blair if he "feels proud to have participated in the slaughter of 700,000 Iraqi children (1.8m Iraqis in total) during sanctions and a further 18,000-100,000 during the recent war".
But I won't hold my breath.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... le8821.htm
"Blair always enjoys his interviews with Paxo," says Roger Mosey, the head of BBC Television News, without a hint of irony.
Blair should enjoy them; he is always spared the imperious bombast that is now a pastiche and kept mostly for official demons. "Watch George Galloway clash with Jeremy Paxman," says the BBC News homepage like a circus barker. Once under the big top of Newsnight, you get the usual set-up: a nonsensical question about whether or not Galloway was "proud of having got rid of one of the few black women in parliament", followed by mockery of the very idea that his opponent, an unabashed Blairite warmonger, should account for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people.
Seven years ago, when Denis Halliday, one of the United Nations' most respected humanitarian aid directors, resigned from his post in Iraq in protest at the Anglo-American-led embargo, calling it "an act of genocide", he was given the Paxo treatment. "Aren't you just an apologist for Saddam Hussein?" he was mock-asked. The following year, Unicef revealed that the embargo had killed half a million Iraqi children. As for East Timor, a triumph of the British arms trade and Robin Cook's "ethical" foreign policy, the presence of British Hawk jets was "not proved", declared Paxo, parroting a Foreign Office lie. (A few months later, Cook came clean.) Today, napalm is used in Iraq, but the armed forces minister is allowed to pretend that it isn't. Israel's weapons of mass destruction are "dangerous in the extreme", says the former head of the US Strategic Command, but that is a permanent taboo.
-
Chupacabra
- Posts: 3783
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am
-
blood.angel
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2000 7:00 am
Good piece. Pilger is spot on about the dismal election 'campaign'.HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:interesting little commentary on Paxman by Pilger...seremtan wrote:Galloway seems to be some sort of stupidity magnet. Anyone see Paxman asking him on election night "if he felt proud of having ousted one of the few black women MPs in parliament"? Fucking inane question.
Still waiting for Paxo to ask Blair if he "feels proud to have participated in the slaughter of 700,000 Iraqi children (1.8m Iraqis in total) during sanctions and a further 18,000-100,000 during the recent war".
But I won't hold my breath.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... le8821.htm
"Blair always enjoys his interviews with Paxo," says Roger Mosey, the head of BBC Television News, without a hint of irony.
Blair should enjoy them; he is always spared the imperious bombast that is now a pastiche and kept mostly for official demons. "Watch George Galloway clash with Jeremy Paxman," says the BBC News homepage like a circus barker. Once under the big top of Newsnight, you get the usual set-up: a nonsensical question about whether or not Galloway was "proud of having got rid of one of the few black women in parliament", followed by mockery of the very idea that his opponent, an unabashed Blairite warmonger, should account for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people.
Seven years ago, when Denis Halliday, one of the United Nations' most respected humanitarian aid directors, resigned from his post in Iraq in protest at the Anglo-American-led embargo, calling it "an act of genocide", he was given the Paxo treatment. "Aren't you just an apologist for Saddam Hussein?" he was mock-asked. The following year, Unicef revealed that the embargo had killed half a million Iraqi children. As for East Timor, a triumph of the British arms trade and Robin Cook's "ethical" foreign policy, the presence of British Hawk jets was "not proved", declared Paxo, parroting a Foreign Office lie. (A few months later, Cook came clean.) Today, napalm is used in Iraq, but the armed forces minister is allowed to pretend that it isn't. Israel's weapons of mass destruction are "dangerous in the extreme", says the former head of the US Strategic Command, but that is a permanent taboo.
first 6 mins are some bloke reading out that pdf from the other day, apparently trying to bore galloway into a stupor - then he hammers their collective cervix into jelly :lol:
video link to the testimony top-right:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4556113.stm
is this on yank telly?
video link to the testimony top-right:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4556113.stm
is this on yank telly?
-
Guest
-
Massive Quasars
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am
Galloway was high-larious when he testified.
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]