28 weeks later... the sequel.

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

Speaking of which, RE: Apocalypse was utter, utter shit.
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Grudge wrote:Speaking of which, RE: Apocalypse was utter, utter shit.
Yes and no.

No, because it got some of the things from the games spot on. The stars where good, with or without the actual RE members, and the nemesis, no matter how short the guy looked, actually looked the part.

But yes, because the film was utter shite to the highest degree and made for 12 years, by 12 year olds. If RE was aimed at the target audience the games were aimed at, then it would of been a gritty horror film. With zombies. Instead, we get an action flick with bullet time and shit. Woo, thats new.
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

I haven't played the games, so to me it was just a really, really shitty movie.
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

Grudge wrote:I haven't played the games, so to me it was just a really, really shitty movie.
The fact you haven't played the games means you should of liked it more.

The fact you still thought it was shit is the exact reason anderson should not even touch a third movie (Which, unfortunatly, he IS doing...)...
Tormentius
Posts: 4108
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Tormentius »

Grudge wrote:Speaking of which, RE: Apocalypse was utter, utter shit.
Meh, it was a cheesy and entertaining zombie flick. Some of us actually like those type of shows ;)
Guest

Post by Guest »

Tormentius wrote:
Grudge wrote:Speaking of which, RE: Apocalypse was utter, utter shit.
Meh, it was a cheesy and entertaining zombie flick. Some of us actually like those type of shows ;)
:icon14:
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

I like cheesy too, but this was just plain bad.
reefsurfer
Posts: 4065
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:00 am

Post by reefsurfer »

Zombie flicks are ALWAYS good... except for House of the dead. :icon33:
LeonardoP
Posts: 811
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2000 7:00 am

Post by LeonardoP »

reefsurfer wrote:Zombie flicks are ALWAYS good... except for House of the dead. :icon33:
lol, that movie was so lame it was good :lol:
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Jackal »

reefsurfer wrote:Zombie flicks are ALWAYS good... except for House of the dead. :icon33:
zeeko
Posts: 865
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2000 7:00 am

Post by zeeko »

if i remember correctly, one of the best movies of all time was shot in AU

Image


and dawn of the dead kicked a lot of ass as well.

anyways... what is the plot supposed to be? is it just about americans repopulating england? wtf where is the "horror" aspect supposed to come from?
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v655/HerrDrFunkenstein/lol.jpg[/img]
saturn
Posts: 4334
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2000 8:00 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by saturn »

Interesting, I liked 28 days later. It felt so claustrofobic while the guy was walking through an empty London. And zombies running that hard and filled with Rage keep the adrenaline pumping.

Shame about the 2nd part though.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

zeeko wrote:is it just about americans repopulating england? wtf where is the "horror" aspect supposed to come from?
:dork:

sounds scary enough to me :)
Post Reply