mars landing

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

mars landing

Post by fKd »



looks cool, dunno about the presentation style... hope it lands :up:
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by DTS »

Saw this on Michio Kaku's site before.
Impressive how they figured out the landing, but they didn't say what it's going to do when it gets there, which makes it a bit meh in the end :|
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

it's due to land in 5 days. there will be some kind of nasa coverage when the time comes.
more info here:

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/mission/rover/
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by DTS »

So what's the difference between this Mars Rover and the previous Mars Rover, that landed and sent back info? Just a different area of the planet?
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

better equipment all around... more detailed analysis on soil samples, etc. Just read the info on that site you lazy bum.
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by DTS »

I did read what you linked to. The page you linked to does not include any info about the previous Mars Rover for comparison :dork:
User avatar
Scourge
Posts: 15559
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Scourge »

You know, you could probably ask Google the same question and it would probably give you the answer.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by obsidian »

Well, for starters, it's about the size of a small car. Hence the need for such a sophisticated landing sequence. You can't just parachute down or bounce on a landing bag like the other two. The MSL will contain a much more advanced manipulator arm and drill to dig deeper into the soil and break open rocks, and a full range of spectrometer instruments to determine the composition of samples. Also note the lack of solar panels - it's packing plutonium.


Image


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Science_Laboratory
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by plained »

that reminds me i have the hot wheels mars stuff somewhere

http://www.amazon.com/Hot-Wheels-Sojour ... B000EKED6I
it is about time!
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: mars landing

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by seremtan »

fKd wrote:looks cool, dunno about the presentation style... hope it lands :up:
i hope so it. looks completely awesome in every way
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by DTS »

obsidian wrote:Also note the lack of solar panels - it's packing plutonium.
Isn't that going to be a massive environmental hazard if it crashes on Earth? Wasn't that the reason for there being no nuclear-powered spacecraft? I read on the Wiki that it's non-fissile; it's still radioactive, though (that's how it works); isn't that still dangerous? :offended:
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by obsidian »

Scourge wrote:You know, you could probably ask Google the same question and it would probably give you the answer.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Transient »

Damn, I didn't know the rover was so close to landing. :up:

The video was a bit on the dramatic side, but a good reminder nonetheless. That power supply looks like it'll last for 14 years before power output drops significantly. I wonder how long the rover will last (assuming it survives the landing)?
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

i was gonna mention it a day before it happened just so you morons might actually remember to check it out.

And yeah, having a set amount of energy is kind of disappointing since the previous rover was able to surpass all expectations ... kept going much longer than expected, and a big part of that wouldn't be possible without solar panels' "renewable" energy source.

Granted, this one is much bigger, it would probably need to haul around a massive amount of solar panel surface area, so it was probably not the best solution.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Transient »

Nah, a wind turbine would do the trick. :up:
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Nightshade »

Did you just --
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by seremtan »

Transient wrote:Nah, a wind turbine would do the trick. :up:
yes it would, were it not for the fact that surface atmospheric pressure on Mars is a fraction of what it is on Earth, thereby rendering turbines useless
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Doombrain »

I hope it lands too. The rover is powered by a small nuclear engine ffs AWESOME.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

Image
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Transient »

seremtan wrote:
Transient wrote:Nah, a wind turbine would do the trick. :up:
yes it would, were it not for the fact that surface atmospheric pressure on Mars is a fraction of what it is on Earth, thereby rendering turbines useless
And here I thought that the only hurdle was the giant turbine sticking off the top of the rover. :(

Edit: I should scroll down all the way before replying. LOL Tsakali. :D
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Eraser »

And yet most people in the world are wondering if their favorite soap opera is on that night.
User avatar
mrd
Posts: 4289
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by mrd »

Nice, this looks pretty wicked. I hope this bad boy lands safe and sound. I recall reading about the launch but I kinda forgot about it. The landing process seems quite complex to be fully automated but assuming they've thought it through properly we may have some nice feeds coming from Mars soon.
TruthfulLiar
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:05 am

Re: mars landing

Post by TruthfulLiar »

no comment from geoff. he must be in denial.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: mars landing

Post by Tsakali »

there is a pretty badass interactive solar system engine here with all kinds of info. shows where the rover is at right now, the speed / distance from mars etc.

http://eyes.nasa.gov/launch2.html?docum ... sl/edl.xml
Post Reply