sweet sexah house muzak fookers

Post by **duffman91** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:11 pm

dmmh wrote:and someone who makes computer music composes and plays......moe cellphonage

:icon19: Christ you're such an idiot. :lol:

:lol: go back to believing your "article" :lol:

Post by **dmmh** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:13 pm

ill find it when I can be arsed

tell me, what music do you listen to?

must be death metal or some crap

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:14 pm

dmmh wrote:ill find it when I can be arsed

tell me, what music do you listen to?

must be death metal or some crap

Post by **duffman91** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:18 pm

dmmh wrote:ill find it when I can be arsed

tell me, what music do you listen to?

must be death metal or some crap

hahahaha.

We share similar musical tastes. I also listen to alot of Brazilian music. What does that have to do with ANYTHING about this topic?

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:23 pm

duffman91 wrote:
dmmh wrote:ill find it when I can be arsed

tell me, what music do you listen to?

must be death metal or some crap
hahahaha.

We share similar musical tastes. I also listen to alot of Brazilian music. What does that have to do with ANYTHING about this topic?

nothing.

Post by **dmmh** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:24 pm

ill prove my words

just be patient

Post by **Fjoggs** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:27 pm

Anyone can download Reason 3 these days, but not everyone can snag an orchestra.

Post by **dmmh** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:43 pm

I can hear the difference between Reason 3 and music created with real hardware. Thats whats Duffman doesnt get and what defines the art of good electronical music

Post by **duffman91** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:02 pm

dmmh wrote:I can hear the difference between Reason 3 and music created with real hardware. Thats whats Duffman doesnt get and what defines the art of good electronical music

Only person "not getting" anything is yourself. I'm still waiting on your so called article.

sys0p · Post by **sys0p** » Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:09 pm

dmmh wrote:
riddla wrote:looping samples of someone else's music = bleh.
BS

good computer music is artistically more complicated to make then classical music, recent studies have shown

get yer 'facts' straight

hahahahahhahahahaha what a complete fucking prick

Testoclesius · Post by **Testoclesius** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:29 am

piddlas all upset :lol:

Testoclesius · Post by **Testoclesius** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:38 am

gay fantasies from piddla :lol: sorry mate i dont swing that way :lol:

Post by **U4EA** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:05 am

Well, this thread certainly gave me a bit of a chuckle.

Testoclesius · Post by **Testoclesius** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:06 am

i didnt say that mate thats just you editing a quote because ive destroyed you so badly youve been left completely defenseless :lol:

Post by **DRuM** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:45 am

One simply can not compare the complexity of classical music to computer music. A 100 musicians in an orchestra playing together takes years of practise to attain the necessary skills to pull off something like the 1812 or beethovens 5th. When they're performing, they really don't have the luxury of quantising and multitracking.

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:01 am

DRuM wrote:One simply can not compare the complexity of classical music to computer music. A 100 musicians in an orchestra playing together takes years of practise to attain the necessary skills to pull off something like the 1812 or beethovens 5th. When they're performing, they really don't have the luxury of quantising and multitracking.

that's not the argument. he thinks that it's easier to compose classical music :lol:

Testoclesius · Post by **Testoclesius** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:26 am

yep youre right mate :lol: its blindingly obvious how retarded you are :lol: dont bother asking your dog though mate :lol:

Testoclesius · Post by **Testoclesius** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:45 am

poor defenseless piddlas been reduced to quote edits again :lol: too easy :lol:

Post by **saturn** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:13 am

lol sander :icon19:

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:15 am

i know, right.

Post by **dmmh** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:31 am

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
DRuM wrote:One simply can not compare the complexity of classical music to computer music. A 100 musicians in an orchestra playing together takes years of practise to attain the necessary skills to pull off something like the 1812 or beethovens 5th. When they're performing, they really don't have the luxury of quantising and multitracking.
that's not the argument. he thinks that it's easier to compose classical music :lol:

thats not what I said, but you cunts just go ahead and take it as you want

Post by **dmmh** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:32 am

riddla wrote:Show us techno 'musicians' who can *simultaneously* compose and perform without having a pre-recorded loop or something not already pre-programmed. I can name thousands of real musicians that can and do, primarily in the Jazz world.

You call it playing an instrument; those of us who actually play instruments and understand music theory call it sorely pathetic wannabe hacking with the use of multiple crutches.

Get over yourself. You like it, but that in no way makes it artistically on the level of a real musician who has paid their dues and actually studied theory to the point of mastering it without electronic aid and a 'band in a box'.

Anyone can program loops, takes about as much talent as programming a VCR :lol:

where did I say techno...or where did I specifically pointed at a certain genre of computer music/ house music?

Post by **dmmh** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:38 am

techno is just a house style, not the collective for all computer music.

americans dont know dick about house music, even though it started in Detroit/ Chicago

Post by **+JuggerNaut+** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:05 am

dmmh wrote: thats not what I said, but you cunts just go ahead and take it as you want

you're right, you said this

dmmh wrote:good computer music is artistically more complicated to make then classical music....

:lol:

Post by **dmmh** » Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:09 am

thanks for proving my point

this is not my opinion lol, its just what a study has shown

lol @ all the ppl falling over this