map testing jgothbeta

Discussion for Level editing, modeling, programming, or any of the other technical aspects of Quake
ShadoW_86
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:20 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by ShadoW_86 »

fkd, I assume you simply don't know Jester :). He's no newbie and belive me, he has hell of experience and also his own developed style. This map is just what it says it is - learning/introducing to q3 engine thing. Give him a little time, and you will be impressed ;).
Just check that - http://j-spot.backshooters.com/maps.html.

Jester - I'm a fan of your q2 work, you simply pushed q2 mapping to new - better level. And I even won't mention that great q2w map, cool to have you here, and I'm sure you will bring sth amazing soon. Without making things too sweet - I really think that your work is just 'ultimate q2 style'.
[url]http://shadowsdomain.wordpress.com/[/url]
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by Eraser »

I don't think copying the id software style is a bad thing to be honest. In fact, among all the other maps we see these days, it's refreshing to see a back-to-basics look in a map.
Noruen
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:45 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by Noruen »

I must agree with fKd. I would like to see this level in else theme with something memorable. But on the other side, design of this level is amazing no less than atmosphere.
j3st3r
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:02 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by j3st3r »

Ok, maybe I will try to redo it something a little different. Looks aside for, how is the item layout?
VolumetricSteve
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:33 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by VolumetricSteve »

I kinda agree with some things I've heard about the gothic style being done to death....but I think the simple solution is to...not play those maps. However, just in establishing if this is a quality map or not, I believe it is a very high quality map. It has all of the things that fit together well to make (what I think) constitutes a good map. This map really nails a lot of enjoyable gameplay, an ok weapon distribution, and looks spectacular. I say, keep up the good work.


I'm sorry if this is a known issue, but I couldn't help but notice this:

Image

*re-edit - quake3world won't accept images from tinypic.com? what gives?
and it blocks the name of the domain? It starts with a T and rhymes with "RinyPic"

If you used all baseq3 textures and shaders...how is there a missing texture? is my quake 3 install just crazy?


for a map like this, I might try to work on the ambience, I know quake 3 supports some neat sound functions in maps that would make it easy to add the sound of a ghostly wind or some other creepy whatevers.
j3st3r
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:02 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by j3st3r »

The missing texture appears to be from the mapmedia file. I think I am going to redo the map in a more accepting look but if you have suggestions on item placement please pass them along.
VolumetricSteve
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:33 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by VolumetricSteve »

I think it has the right weapon layout for the kind of map that it is....

I do something different in my maps, I do large blocks of guns and their ammo, so when you pick up a rocket launcher, it comes with like a billion rockets, also if you're running through at high speed, you don't have to hunt for ammo quite so much. One reason I do this is because it allows for weapon favoritism. You're never forced to use a weapon you don't want to use (generally).


The way you have it set up is more "pro" I think, and makes people do more with less. Which I also think can be a good thing, it's just less excessive. So I guess in the end, consider what your goals are with your map are, and if you want it to lean a certain way, just weigh that against your goals.
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by fKd »

unless your opponent/s camps the guns. that really is not a good way to place items steve.

for the kinda gameplay you are explaining ppl will play ra3 where they all have all the guns etc, but in vanilla q3 etc it does not play out well at all.
Noruen
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:45 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by Noruen »

But I think gothic style is really good and changing it is REALLY wrong. I thought just only to add some significant details.
Bliccer
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:27 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by Bliccer »

I second this post above: If used correctly (what you do) the gothic set is good for the eyes and aiming. It's not as distracting as a fancy tech/lightning set. That's probably why I can't play UT3 it's too much details. In Single it's cool, in Multi it's bad.
Anthem
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:34 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by Anthem »

Indeed. If done right, Gothic is great. If used incorrectly it will turn out like Dessicated Corpse's maps.
[url=http://www.xfire.com/profile/vlnoheaven/][img]http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m231/Lowerboy444/xfire.png[/img][/url]

[url=http://teameventhorizon.com/]Team Event -O- Horizon[/url]

[url=http://mapping.maverickservers.com/]NoGhost Map Making Competition 2 (June 2010)[/url]
VolumetricSteve
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:33 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by VolumetricSteve »

Oh crap.

Anthem 1 | Dessicated Corpse 0


Also,

fKd wrote:unless your opponent/s camps the guns. that really is not a good way to place items steve.

for the kinda gameplay you are explaining ppl will play ra3 where they all have all the guns etc, but in vanilla q3 etc it does not play out well at all.
I dunno, it's worked out pretty well so far. Why would having opponents camp the guns have an impact on that? (which they can't do, because if the number of players is less than the number of guns, which is almost always is in my maps, they can't possibly camp every single gun at once) I'm actually not sure what your point is...elaborate?
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by fKd »

my point is that its a shit way to place items in q3, ask anyone
/blunt

:olo:
themuffinman
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:29 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by themuffinman »

VolumetricSteve wrote:I do something different in my maps, I do large blocks of guns and their ammo, so when you pick up a rocket launcher, it comes with like a billion rockets, also if you're running through at high speed, you don't have to hunt for ammo quite so much. One reason I do this is because it allows for weapon favoritism. You're never forced to use a weapon you don't want to use (generally)
The way I see it, forcing people to manage their ammo properly is what keeps a game from turning into a spam fest. On the other end of the scale, if you're giving out loads of ammo then people will just be spamming rockets and nades everywhere. Clan Arena in QL is proof of that.

Besides which, allowing for weapon favoritism just shallows out the gameplay. A good duel map should force it's players to use as many of the weapons available as possible, in the most efficient way possible.
j3st3r
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:02 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by j3st3r »

After searching for other texture sets and looking at the map file I have decided to leave it as is. I would have to change to much brush work to get another set to work. Here is the latest link for download. If you have any suggestions on item placement, please pass them along.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15159109/jgothbeta.RAR
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by obsidian »

I like goth maps. Makes me feel nostalgic and a little bit warm and fuzzy inside.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
dichtfux
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:51 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by dichtfux »

The texturing is great and suits the brushwork perfectly - although the textures are dated. I wouldn't change this map, just do something that's not baseq3 in your next map and everyone will be happy. :)
[color=#FFFFFF][url=http://maps.rcmd.org]my FPS maps[/url][/color]
deqer
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:30 pm

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by deqer »

dichtfux wrote:just do something that's not baseq3 in your next map and everyone will be happy. :)
jeez. I always thought the opposite. I figured people would appreciate the standard stuff more than abnormal stuff. :(
VolumetricSteve
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:33 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by VolumetricSteve »

themuffinman wrote:
The way I see it, forcing people to manage their ammo properly is what keeps a game from turning into a spam fest. On the other end of the scale, if you're giving out loads of ammo then people will just be spamming rockets and nades everywhere. Clan Arena in QL is proof of that.

Besides which, allowing for weapon favoritism just shallows out the gameplay. A good duel map should force it's players to use as many of the weapons available as possible, in the most efficient way possible.

That's a good point. I just kinda like the "spam" though, it's over the top and just...fast paced madness. Especially if the map gets loaded up with Excessive+ that's just the kind of thing I enjoy most of the time. You got me thinking though...maybe doing different versions of the same maps, but in more the weapon placement style you suggested...that might be interesting actually. I'll likely give it a shot later on. I'll need some guidance though, what maps are good references for that kind of weapon placement?
VolumetricSteve
Posts: 449
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:33 am

Re: map testing jgothbeta

Post by VolumetricSteve »

Just tested the new version, looks REALLY good.

Found one bug.

Image

There's a hole, probably caused by the use of a caulk surface you might wanna just set it to something really dark...or just something that won't allow visibility right through the wall there.

Pretty damn fantastic otherwise, nicely done.
Post Reply