LED vs plasma...
Re: LED vs plasma...
I didn't think plasmas needed the extra Hz. I thought only LCDs needed the extra Hz to be smooth.
-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
Re: LED vs plasma...
Thats the thing, when playing 24p content the refresh rate is typically lowered to a multiple of 24. Which is why plasma's seem like they might not be such a great option anymore.
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 8:00 am
Re: LED vs plasma...
If you're going to get a plasma then get the panasonic v10 series. Remember, when Pioneer went down, Panasonic took 2/3rd of their engineers and all of their patents. Panasonic is light years ahead of their competition in the plasma field. With the refresh rate, nowadays with the new 240hz refresh rate, you can't really tell the difference from 120hz. It's all about the video processing within the TV. Shoot me a msg if you have any questions, I work for Samsung.
Re: LED vs plasma...
If you work for Samsung, why are you recommending people get a Panasonic TV?Mr.Sparkle! wrote:If you're going to get a plasma then get the panasonic v10 series. Remember, when Pioneer went down, Panasonic took 2/3rd of their engineers and all of their patents. Panasonic is light years ahead of their competition in the plasma field. With the refresh rate, nowadays with the new 240hz refresh rate, you can't really tell the difference from 120hz. It's all about the video processing within the TV. Shoot me a msg if you have any questions, I work for Samsung.


Nah, it's good that you're not biased. I just found the idea funny

Re: LED vs plasma...
Most mid to upper tier plasma sets come as 24p capable...just like their LCD counterparts.Deathshroud wrote:Thats the thing, when playing 24p content the refresh rate is typically lowered to a multiple of 24. Which is why plasma's seem like they might not be such a great option anymore.
Re: LED vs plasma...
lolDeathshroud wrote:Thats the thing, when playing 24p content the refresh rate is typically lowered to a multiple of 24. Which is why plasma's seem like they might not be such a great option anymore.
Re: LED vs plasma...
Juggs? DB?Fender wrote:I didn't think plasmas needed the extra Hz. I thought only LCDs needed the extra Hz to be smooth.
Re: LED vs plasma...
Anything but 1080p 24 runs at 400/600hz and is super smooth, better than any LCD.Fender wrote:Juggs? DB?Fender wrote:I didn't think plasmas needed the extra Hz. I thought only LCDs needed the extra Hz to be smooth.
For out and out IQ on HD you still can't beat a good LCD, but I’m talking about real pixel peeping shit here as in standing right next to a frozen image and getting a loop out.. For all overall IQ you can't beat a modern plasma.
Just last night I was watching Discovery HD channel, I still find it amazing.
It’s just a shame they are so thick and heavy.
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: LED vs plasma...
^this. and any top of the line lcd's unnoticeable pixel smoothness is trumped by plasmas black level.
Re: LED vs plasma...
We just bought the same TV. Though the one I got was a 54".Doombrain wrote:http://shop.panasonic.co.uk/invt/txp50s10b
Re: LED vs plasma...
that's OK, if it's all you can afford.
Re: LED vs plasma...
Thin and light plasma: http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_305P ... l=Y&tp=161
-
- Posts: 22175
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am
Re: LED vs plasma...
i won't utilize the space behind my current plasma for anything.
Re: LED vs plasma...
oddly enough, my modem/router is there 

Re: LED vs plasma...
niceshaft wrote:Thin and light plasma: http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_305P ... l=Y&tp=161
-
- Posts: 10074
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: LED vs plasma...
Sweet TV.shaft wrote:Thin and light plasma: http://signature.crutchfield.com/s_305P ... l=Y&tp=161
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2000 8:00 am
Re: LED vs plasma...
I'm not going to bash another company or tell lies when there are better products out there. If someone is in the market for a LED display then I would tell them to get the 8500 Series. Samsung's 860 series is still awesome but there are better plasma displays out there.DTS wrote:If you work for Samsung, why are you recommending people get a Panasonic TV?Mr.Sparkle! wrote:If you're going to get a plasma then get the panasonic v10 series. Remember, when Pioneer went down, Panasonic took 2/3rd of their engineers and all of their patents. Panasonic is light years ahead of their competition in the plasma field. With the refresh rate, nowadays with the new 240hz refresh rate, you can't really tell the difference from 120hz. It's all about the video processing within the TV. Shoot me a msg if you have any questions, I work for Samsung.PR disaster
Nah, it's good that you're not biased. I just found the idea funny