Googlepedia..

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Googlepedia..

Post by MKJ »

Google wants a slice of the Wikipedia-pie and decides to build it's own

http://knol.google.com/


seriously, do we need another wiki?
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

some people around here need one to quote more "sources"
bork[e]
Posts: 4357
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 8:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by bork[e] »

MKJ wrote:we need another wiki?
if google can capitalize on the shortcomings of the original then yes
Underpants?
Posts: 4755
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2001 7:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by Underpants? »

wikipedia falls short often enough to be considered a weak if not unacceptable source in most of academia.
if the google implementation is based on the same principles, i don't really know how it's going to be any better.
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by andyman »

i wonder how long it's going to be in beta mode, like google mail

and this is pointless...
Therac-25
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 1999 8:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by Therac-25 »

it's search sucks like rain on a wedding day.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36013
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by seremtan »

Underpants? wrote:wikipedia falls short often enough to be considered a weak if not unacceptable source in most of academia.
if the google implementation is based on the same principles, i don't really know how it's going to be any better.
i don't think wikipedia is really aimed at an academic audience [/understatementofthedecade]

it's for people who want a quick answer to one of those kinds of questions that come up randomly, like "what's the capital of suriname?" or "what's that condition called when you only have one testicle?"
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by Fender »

^ lol
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by andyman »

the only thing i like about wikipedia is that most of the pictures posted on the pages are a decently high resolution
glossy
Posts: 2282
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 7:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by glossy »

Underpants? wrote:wikipedia falls short often enough to be considered a weak if not unacceptable source in most of academia.
if the google implementation is based on the same principles, i don't really know how it's going to be any better.
They're trying to counter this through accountability. It's not an "encyclopedia that anyone can edit", it's an encyclopedia that only certain people who are experts in their field and have been verified as such can edit.

At the moment it's pretty loaded down with medical articles which I guess could have been expected due to its focus, but I don't think we'll be seeing any 2,000 word articles on Weezer's Pork and Beans single on it any time soon.
Pext
Posts: 4257
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:00 am

Re: Googlepedia..

Post by Pext »

wikipedia is also the best math resource on the web
Post Reply