The new Hulk movie

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

The new Hulk movie

Post by tnf »

I didn't even know there was one in the works until the banner ad showed up. How is this one related to the last Hulk? Or are they completely unrelated movies? The last one sucked. I wonder if they addressed that.
Turing
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:28 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Turing »

Pretty unrelated, but they could be. This one seems to pick up roughly where the last one left off in the Hulk story, with him being in South America doing his best to avoid getting pissed off and just being a doctor for poor villagers.

It's going to be better than Iron Man. No question. Even though he looks a bit naff in the previews, Iron Man's CG was pretty obvious too, so it doesn't bug me. This movie is going to be fucking awesome.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by obsidian »

I think they are trying to forget that there was a first one but sort of continue with the fact that he's already the Hulk and he's on the run.
Dukester
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Dukester »

Why does the Hulk get a second chance?

Why not Daredevil?

Why did the Fantastic Four get a second chance after that abortion the first movie was came out?

Daredevil was, by no means a great movie, but I didn't fall asleep during it like I did the first Hulk movie. :(
Turing
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:28 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Turing »

The Hulk gets a second chance because they're going to make an Avengers movie.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Daredevil no second chance because that's a fucking stupid super hero by default.
Dukester
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Dukester »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:Daredevil no second chance because that's a fucking stupid super hero by default.
Oh goddamit! Just because you have a right to your own opinions doesn't mean you should start shooting them off left and right! :p

Withougt Daredevil we would have no Frank Miller!

Not sure if that is a good or bad thing :)
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

obsidian wrote:I think they are trying to forget that there was a first one but sort of continue with the fact that he's already the Hulk and he's on the run.
That's what I was thinking. Ed Norton brings a level of watchability to any role he does so I'm hoping this is decent.
menkent
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 7:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by menkent »

still looked like a big cartoon hulk running around in a live action film, a la Roger Rabbit. unless it gets crazy reviews i'm gonna wait for dvd on this one.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by xer0s »

I like Ed Norton, but I just can't imagine this film being all that great...
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Turing wrote:The Hulk gets a second chance because they're going to make an Avengers movie.
That's a movie I'm actually anticipating with boyish wood.
Turing
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:28 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Turing »

menkent wrote:still looked like a big cartoon hulk running around in a live action film, a la Roger Rabbit. unless it gets crazy reviews i'm gonna wait for dvd on this one.
And? Iron Man didn't look any more realistic, just shinier. That movie was bad ass.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Turing wrote:The Hulk gets a second chance because they're going to make an Avengers movie.
atleast someone got it.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Nightshade »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:Daredevil no second chance because that's a fucking stupid super hero by default.
BLASPHEMY
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by o'dium »

Iron Man was awesome, and it shows this new way of them making movies works.

Hulk looks great, and the fact Norton is behind it in a big way really fills me with hope.

The first hulk was fucking awful...
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Everytime i see norton i want to punch him in the face....
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Plan B »

o'dium wrote:...
The first hulk was fucking awful...

Except the hulked dogs...and the non-hulked Jennifer Connelly.
Maiden
Posts: 832
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Maiden »

Nightshade wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:Daredevil no second chance because that's a fucking stupid super hero by default.
BLASPHEMY
seconded.

they already fucked up the best DD story line out there, but I'd like to see another flick if it was done right this time.
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Transient »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:Everytime i see norton i want to punch him in the face....
I am Jack's raging bile duct.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
menkent
Posts: 2629
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 7:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by menkent »

Turing wrote:And? Iron Man didn't look any more realistic, just shinier. That movie was bad ass.
cgi metal looks better than cgi skin.
Jackal
Posts: 3635
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Jackal »

Daredevil will never translate properly to screen since he's basically just a normal guy and people don't find that all that cool. Sure he has powers but they aren't offensive and as such don't lend themselves well to LOLSPECIALFX. Punisher sucked for the same reason and I imagine Captain America may suck as well.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Nightshade »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:Everytime i see norton i want to punch him in the face....
He'd kick ur ass...
Turing
Posts: 574
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:28 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Turing »

I thought Punisher was pretty bad ass. They're doing him over again too, though. Punisher: War Zone.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by MKJ »

Jackal wrote:Daredevil will never translate properly to screen since he's basically just a normal guy and people don't find that all that cool. Sure he has powers but they aren't offensive and as such don't lend themselves well to LOLSPECIALFX. Punisher sucked for the same reason and I imagine Captain America may suck as well.
which is also prolly why they made Catwomen a gammarayed supergirl in the movie. fail
User avatar
Mat Linnett
Posts: 2483
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2000 7:00 am
Location: The Grizzly Grotto

Re: The new Hulk movie

Post by Mat Linnett »

Turing wrote:I thought Punisher was pretty bad ass. They're doing him over again too, though. Punisher: War Zone.
Wait, which Punisher do you mean?
The original 1989 Dolph Lundgren one or the Thomas Jane one from 2004?
Both were pretty awful, and the Jane one featured a particularly anaemic Castle while completely botching the origin story.

I'd love to see someone do a proper Punisher movie following the stories from the Punisher Max series written by Garth Ennis.
Sadly, there's no way such a movie would get anything other than a R rating, so I'm guessing Marvel Studios would be reluctant to fund such a movie.
Post Reply