Holy Crap (War Machine)

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Image

omg look at this piece of shit. it's got no armor therefore it's shit and useless lol.

Image

omg look at this piece of shit. it's got no armor and made of wood therefore it's shit and useless lol.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

chill out disk twat
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Doombrain wrote:you've been watching too many films, you cock. a friend of mine just spent six months out there and from what he's told us it's not like playing doom.
Lol, what the fuck? Where did i say it was like playing doom? You're the one arguing for a Halo buggy, not me. And whoopteedoo, we both know someone that's been down there.
Doombrain wrote:anyway, it's a fucking support vehicle that's a direct result of the designers asking the TROOPS what they wanted! lol, stop losing now please.
Yeah, sorry, that doesn't convince me at all this thing is as useful as they say it'll be, for the reasons i gave.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

OK action man :olo:
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Nightshade wrote:Did you read the article?
One senior Army officer described the new super-truck as a "serious bit of kit", adding it would be a "huge boost to our long-range patrolling capability".

Senior defence sources say the Supacats will particularly come into their own against the Taliban in Afghanistan's Helmand Province, which has no roads.

Defence Minister Lord Drayson said last night: "These vehicles are well armed, swift and agile and will boost our capability with some serious firepower.
Sure i did. Then i read the comments, too:
Light armoured beast? Where is the angled hull and high ground clearance to divert the blast from mines? The major threat is surely from mines and IEDs buried in the road, which can disable a tank and which have killed and injured dozens of our troops. Have the MOD got it wrong again?
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

WELL IT'S A GOOD JOB IT WON'T BE USED AS A TANK THEN :olo:
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Doombrain wrote:OK action man :olo:
God you really are a childish twat aren't you :olo:
Posting pictures of helicopters and boats that have nothing at all to do with the discussion at hand, dismissing arguments with oneliners and blue laughing icons instead of coming up with arguments of your own... idiot.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Doombrain wrote:WELL IT'S A GOOD JOB IT WON'T BE USED AS A TANK THEN :olo:
You think the Talibs are going to be real nice and only plant IED's and mines for the tanks? That they're gonna save those precious RPG rounds for heavy armor only? What are you some kind of nutjob?
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Ryoki wrote:
Doombrain wrote:OK action man :olo:
God you really are a childish twat aren't you :olo:
Posting pictures of helicopters and boats that have nothing at all to do with the discussion at hand, dismissing arguments with oneliners and blue laughing icons instead of coming up with arguments of your own... idiot.
well i kind of think you got past that point when you missed its primary use.
face it, it upsets you and you feel the need to attack it with your grippy hands.
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Post by MKJ »

lol armchair veterans
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Ryoki wrote:
Doombrain wrote:WELL IT'S A GOOD JOB IT WON'T BE USED AS A TANK THEN :olo:
You think the Talibs are going to be real nice and only plant IED's and mines for the tanks? That they're gonna save those precious RPG rounds for heavy armor only? What are you some kind of nutjob?
ONE MILE AWAY!
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Post by 4days »

the same story was on telly - they're not supposed to be used in areas where IEDs and short-range snipers are a real threat, more for chasing people in toyota's around the countryside.

it'll easily protect the soldier's pimply arses from a mine, just not roadside ieds or being shot at (or, come to think of it, people throwing cups of water at them).

the new town car is a yank thing:

http://www.defense-update.com/products/c/cougar.htm
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

But not even the capital is safe from bombers and IEDs. I just have a hard time buying the whole 'safe areas' bit.

...oh fuck it, i give up. Maybe you guys are right.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Ryoki wrote:
Nightshade wrote:Did you read the article?
One senior Army officer described the new super-truck as a "serious bit of kit", adding it would be a "huge boost to our long-range patrolling capability".

Senior defence sources say the Supacats will particularly come into their own against the Taliban in Afghanistan's Helmand Province, which has no roads.

Defence Minister Lord Drayson said last night: "These vehicles are well armed, swift and agile and will boost our capability with some serious firepower.
Sure i did. Then i read the comments, too:
Light armoured beast? Where is the angled hull and high ground clearance to divert the blast from mines? The major threat is surely from mines and IEDs buried in the road, which can disable a tank and which have killed and injured dozens of our troops. Have the MOD got it wrong again?
Riiiight. So, you read a comment from someone not in the military and unaffiliated with the vehicle and you completely ignore the vehicle's purpose as stated by those in the know? Uhh...
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

Nah, i pointed that one out because he came to the same conclusion as i did in regards to IEDs, after seeing that picture... You don't have to be in the military or affiliated with the vehicle to come to the conclusion that the people driving that thing are vulnerable to explosions.
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

And tanks are vulnerable to shells fired from 16" guns on battleships, but that doesn't mean that tanks are meant to be employed in an anti-battleship role.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

leave it before ryoki brings out the armored scud guns
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

He's already conceded, gents.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

i like to kick em with my aircraft carriers when they're down.
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

I'm not sure he's sufficiently armoured to withstand that.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

It has firepower but it's obviously going to be vulnerable to IED's and rpg's.
Ryoki
Posts: 13460
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Ryoki »

watch out or doombrain will obliterate your armor like he did mine
[size=85][color=#0080BF]io chiamo pinguini![/color][/size]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

come on, don't be childish
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

HEY WHERE'D ICCY GO?
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

well. when his wingman (ryoki) got shot by me from a mile away, after watching me burn off at 80mph the dirty sand nagger got in his armored nissan and fucked off.
Post Reply