I am by no means an Apple fan, but...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

MKJ wrote:
Dr.Gibbs wrote:Not sure I can justify paying $1500 for a computer that only has 256MB of RAM :dork:
dont forget that macs use ram differently than peecees.

similar comparison: the xbox only had 64 mb ram, but is quite seccuesful holding its own :smirk:

but 256 is still on the low side, even for a mac
Nah, Macs generally need more RAM than PCs; 'specially in OS X
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Geebs wrote: Nah, Macs generally need more RAM than PCs; 'specially in OS X
MKJ wrote:
dont forget that macs use ram differently than peecees.
I love these Mac/PC comparisons that always seem to include magic and/or broad generalizations.
Geebs
Posts: 3849
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:56 pm

Post by Geebs »

Hey, you're only a wannabe mac fag. I've been a mac fag for years.
Canis
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Canis »

SplishSplash wrote:
Geebs wrote: Nah, Macs generally need more RAM than PCs; 'specially in OS X
MKJ wrote:
dont forget that macs use ram differently than peecees.
I love these Mac/PC comparisons that always seem to include magic and/or broad generalizations.
Lol! Fine...how about the differences in the way they process memory address 0x00004FF3? I think PCs do it a lot more efficiently than Macs, but that's just my humble opinion.
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Geebs wrote:Hey, you're only a wannabe mac fag. I've been a mac fag for years.
true :tear:
Post Reply