I have a new opinion of pit bulls

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

I have a new opinion of pit bulls

Post by R00k »

Sorry this turned out to be a novel. If you don't like reading, just ignore it. :)

I have a good friend (known him for 15 years) who has a pit bull. He's raised him pretty well, given him plenty of attention and playing with him, and has taken him through obedience school several months ago. He's a pretty good dog all around from everything I've seen. He's great with people, and hasn't ever been aggressive toward anyone. I and my friends have all spent plenty of time with him, and he's always been great around us.

My gf and I went camping this weekend with another couple - we go all the time together when the weather is nice. They have a lab mix -- Baby -- who's the sweetest (and most spoiled btw) dog in the world, and pretty submissive. As everybody here knows, I have a year old rottweiler -- Metzger -- who's also been to obedience school, and is one of the best trained dogs I've ever personally known, because we've worked with him since he was 8 weeks old.

When we go to the campsite, we let our dogs off the leash and they love it (mine and the lab mix). They play with each other until they're worn out, but they never stray more than 40 or 50 feet from camp unless it's to walk with one of us. It's great, since we never have to worry about the dogs, they keep themselves occupied and practically ignore us for the most part, unless they just want a belly rub or a scratch.

Anyway, as I said we went camping last night, and my other friend decided he would come out and bring his dog too. I knew he was trained, and thought maybe Metzger would have somebody closer to his size to play with.

We had been out there for a bit before they came. My friend (J) drove down the road and asked if there was a way he could pull all the way down to camp, since our trucks were blocking the road. We told him he could go back out part of the way, and take a different road to come in around the back side of the property.

So for some reason he let his dog out of the truck and took off to go around the other way -- I have no idea why he did this, because I'd never do that with my dog whether there were other people/animals there or not. It just seems irresponsible to me.

So his dog -- John -- came down and was greeted by our dogs. They romped and played for about 10 seconds or so, all seemingly good-natured fun. But it only lasted a few seconds, and then John jumped in the air on my dog's back and started attacking him, leaping across two of the girls' chairs (my gf's and another friend of ours who is pregnant).

Of course I immediately ran over there (they were only about 10 feet from me), and had to grab two handfuls of skin on John's rear thighs, and lift him completely off the ground, before he would let go of my dog. My dog was snapping to try to defend himself too, but he stopped biting when he saw me grab John to pull him off. John just would not let go.

So, since J didn't have a crate with him, and I did, I put Metzger in his crate, and J tethered John to a tree with his leash (he pulled his truck around a couple minutes after it happened, and missed it).

John was whining staring at Metzger in his crate, and Metzger was whining looking at John, so I thought maybe they got off on the wrong foot, and they might be able to get along if both their owners were there when they met again, and could tell we were all friends and there weren't any rivals.

So about half an hour later or so, I took Metzger out of his crate on his leash, and walked him over near John while J was there.
They just sniffed each others' noses for a second, while their tails were wagging slightly, and it looked like they might do okay. But then, without warning, John went airborne again right at Metzger. I pulled him away before anything could happen of course -- no harm done, but it looked like they wouldn't ever be able to be off the leash at the same time with each other.

Just about a minute and a half after that, Baby -- the submissive lab mix -- walked back over to John to see him again. Again, after about 3 or 4 seconds, John leapt at her and knocked her down, but she got out of reach of his tether and was fine.

So by this point it was obvious that, for whatever reason, John wasn't going to be able to get along with either of them, and J was going to have to keep him leashed at all times. It could have been that John felt threatened by both dogs because he was thrown in the mix without his owner, and not knowing either of them at all. For whatever reason, he obviously felt a little threatened (at least that's what I assume).

Fine. Metzger went back in his crate before long, and stayed there while we ate. I put him on the leash and took him away to walk him for a minute, and then came back. J had John on his leash, and he was sitting with him by the fire, probably 12 feet from Metzger's crate.

So when I came back with Metzger, I was kneeling with him beside his crate and giving him a good collar scratch. He was sitting (as he usually is when he wants attention) facing me, and my back was to J and John.

I barely heard any commotion or movement before John was over my shoulder and latched onto Metzger. He had bolted straight toward us, yanking the leash out of J's hand, and pounced before anybody even knew what happened.

Within just a few seconds, he had his jaws locked on Metzger's neck and wouldn't let go for anything. I had John by the leash, pulling him as hard as I possibly could (my friend was pulling Metzger on the other side). It was quickly obvious that my dog wasn't doing shit except waiting for somebody to get this beast off of him.

As I said, John's jaws were locked on Metzger's neck, and was NOT going to let go. I'm not used to dealing with this kind of shit personally -- my dog was yelping like he was on fire, and here is a pit bull with his jaws around his throat. So I acted on my instincts, which was obviously not the best move I could have made. I started wailing on him with everything I had. I had his leash in my left hand, pulling like hell, and with my right hand I was slamming his head with haymaker after haymaker, possibly the hardest I've ever punched anything. I beat on him so hard and fast that I was actually starting to slow down a little bit after a few seconds -- and it wasn't doing shit. Nothing. He wasn't even noticing it. He was completely focused on squeezing my dog's neck between his jaws until he stopped moving, and to hell with whatever else was going on. Finally, somebody actually said something that made sense -- he's not going to let go until you choke him off. It was something we should have thought of obviously -- but I wasn't the only one slugging John either, 2 or 3 of us were.

So the other 2 guys grabbed his neck like they were trying to choke him, which wasn't doing much because his entire neck is pure muscle. I reached under his chin and grabbed and squeezed his throat for about 10-15 seconds, before he finally let go long enough for J to grab him, and me to get to Metzger.

Metzger is fine, thank god. He only has a couple of small cuts on his neck where John's teeth were, and we tended those and he'll be okay.

My hand had a little of John's blood on it from repeatedly slugging the shit out of him, but after he got home and cleaned up, he didn't really suffer any injuries aside from scratches and really minor cuts.

After we broke them up, Metzger walked away with me and just sat while I touched his neck, checked his cuts, and made sure he was okay. He wasn't even as worked up as I was, and was being pretty damn calm all things considered -- he was barely breathing heavy.

John, however, was staring at Metzger and kept trying to find a way to get to him again for a few minutes after it was broken up.

I feel bad for the way I reacted too of course -- it was not productive in any way, and was pure instinctive reaction. I can imagine a parent might do something similar if they saw their child in the jaws of a pit bull.


At any rate, regardless of causes (lack of training, feeling threatened, irresponsible decision by J, etc...), I got a firsthand look at one aspect of pit bulls for the first time last night: their genetic, instinctive behavior.

You have to understand something -- my dog does not become aggressive when he feels threatened (unless he is backed into a corner probably, but I've never experienced that scenario, and don't plan to allow that to happen). I remember taking him to the dog park a couple months ago, when there was another rottweiler there that was very poorly trained. It horded toys - it would gather all 4 tennis balls in the park into its mouth at once and lay down with them, and if another dog approached, it would growl and bark, and even snap. This is indicative of complete neglect on its owners part to check that kind of behavior.
Metzger was there and wanted to play with a tennis ball, so he walked toward where one was lying on the ground, and the other rottie beat him to it. He already had all the other balls in his mouth and couldn't pick it up, so he just laid on it and dropped all the other balls between his front legs. When Metzger got within 5 feet of him, he barked at him loudly and started growling. Metzger had never ever seen anything like that behavior before, so he just stared at the dog for about 10 seconds without moving. Then, he turned around, walked about 10 feet away, and then sat down facing the other dog, just looking at him.

That may seem like a tangent, but the point I'm trying to make is this: My dog, when he feels threatened, and he has no training basis on which to act (i.e. we've never given him training for that specific scenario), will revert to a wait-and-see kind of bearing, and will not aggress toward another dog.

Pit bulls on the other hand, were bred for dog-fighting. That's the reason they were bred, and it is in their blood. Of course, that behavior can be removed through lots of training. But what happens when they get put in a situation for which they have no training experience on which to act? This dog, when it encountered something that seemed like it might be threatening, and was not trained to act a certain way in that specific situation, immediately tried to kill my dog, as quickly as possible. It went straight for his throat first off, and once he locked on jaws on it, would not let go until my dog stopped moving. Remember, my dog stopped fighting back, and was holding his head straight up and yelping. Yet John was not going to release his jaws for anything.

So I firmly believe that a pit bull's innate behavior, for the most part like any other dog, can be adjusted through lots of training. You can see what the Dog Whisperer has done with pit bulls, and they certainly are capable of getting along with other dogs just fine.

All dogs get fearful, threatened or otherwise out of sorts at some point or another. When that happens, the intelligent breeds revert to what they've been trained to do, if they've been trained. Other dogs, that either haven't been trained, or aren't as intelligent or impressionable through training, will revert to instinctive reactions.

With many dogs this isn't a problem. It's a fight or flight scenario, and unless they are in a corner, or forced to defend themselves, many dogs will choose flight. Some other dogs may even bark, snap and jump, because that is the instinct of their breed, genetically speaking.

Pit bulls will immediately go for the throat of whatever is threatening them, and will not let go until it is dead, because that behavior has been bred into them over generations. That is the same way they behave in dog fights.

For that reason, I obviously don't blame the dog for the way he reacted. I blame J for not controlling his dog, and not socializing and training him the way he should have (although he really has done quite a bit of work in this area while raising him), and letting him out of the truck on his own with two other strange dogs running around. John just acted on his instincts. But, those instincts being what they are, I will never own a pit bull, and I will never let another one anywhere near my dog, or my kids if I ever have any.

I have always had a "to each their own" attitude toward people who own pits. I probably wouldn't have one, but if they like the dogs and are responsible, then who cares if they want one -- just like any other dog?

Now I'm starting to question why dogs that were bred for dog fighting even exist any longer. I don't think there is any place in our society for mean dogs, which is why I've set out from the beginning to make sure Metzger never becomes one. So, why would we even have dogs that were bred to fight?

Even more puzzling to me though -- why would anyone want a dog bred for fighting, if they don't want their dog to get in fights?

I'm not trying to pass any kind of judgment here though. Just sharing the story, and how it made me feel.
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

glad to hear your pooch is ok
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Thanks. I honestly can't believe how tough he is, or how well-behaved he was throughout everything. Everybody there commented on it, made me really proud. :tear:

He's been sleeping ever since we walked in the door.
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Hannibal »

Sounds rough. We bred and raised black, chocolate, and yellow labs for about 15 years. That dog (CAPT OBVIOUS) has a behavior problem.....THUS:



------->Image
Last edited by Hannibal on Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Hannibal »

R00k wrote: He's been sleeping ever since we walked in the door.
Yeah, it's called trauma. Just give 'em some TLC and kibbles n' bits n' shit.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

I agree. But I can't help but wonder how things would have turned out, if J had not let him out of the truck and taken off at the beginning.

He claims he's been around plenty of other dogs and never had any problems. I've only ever been around him with people, not other dogs.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Glad you're dog's ok, and I can say with all honesty that if ti was Moose he went after, that pit would have been dead. Period.
That said, you had an experience with a pit bull, not with pit bulls. There may be something in this particular dogs lineage that led up to him being aggressive towards other dogs, but that's far from the breed standard. That dog has either be watched like a hawk for the rest of his life, or put down. Maybe Cesar Millan could rehab him, but that's what it would take to remove that behavior. But, maybe he just didn't like Metzger and Baby.
Pits are great dogs, if raised and trained properly. Reference Bandog Dread, the single most titled dog of any breed in history. He appeared in The Good Son with Macaulay Culkin.
http://www.workingpitbull.com/New%20Sit ... /dread.htm
I don't know anything about your friend, but 99% of the time the problem lies with the owner. Every time I see some fucking asshole retard walking a pit or Rottie with a goddamn battleship chain for a leash I want to run them the fuck over.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Damn rook, i am sorry to hear that..


Your dog's behavour sounds alot like my Dog. She is a Husky, White Sheppard, Wolf Mix and by far she is the best dog ever.

we've never had to put her through any training at all, she wants nothing more then to be around us and she dosent Stray off even if there is another dog Edging her on.

i hope your dog is ok though man :)
horton
Posts: 1080
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2001 7:00 am

Post by horton »

I have friends with pit bulls, staffordshire bull terriers etc and I think they are great dogs.

however, they are great with humans, and they have the history of being bred to fight other dogs..not go to for the random bites like most dogs, not even to hold on, but to hold and shake/rip/kill other dogs.

I love them to death, but I would always be aware of what they were bred for, for 100s of years.

I would love one, and if I had one, I would keep it away from other dogs, pitbulls belong with humans, not with other dogs.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Yea, I know there are a lot of great pits out there, and I made a couple of generalizations that weren't accurate.

First, I know that not all pits have bloodlines to fighting dogs, and also know that not all of them have those tendencies. But the fact is that when the American Pit Bull Terrier was first bred in this country, they quickly became predominantly used for fighting, and a majority of people who bred them were breeding them to emphasize the qualities that were ideal for dog-fighting.

So a lot of pits in this country today are direct descendants of pit-fighting dogs, which were intentionally made aggressive toward other dogs, to the point of killing them.

Unfortunately, when dealing with a pit bull that isn't your own, there is no way to know what stock it came from. So from this point forward, I'm taking the approach of dealing with all pits as if they were fighting dogs.

There are tons of exceptions to that kind of behavior, but honestly it just makes sense from a safety standpoint to treat all of them as if they might possess such tendencies. If a dog and owner prove me wrong, I'll be happy to hang out with that particular dog.

It's kind of unfortunate (not to mention a cynical way to look at it), but I'm not going to let what happened this weekend happen again.

Secondly: Yea, the biggest part of what happened last night was the fault of the owner (isn't it always?).

But the difference is, with most breeds of dogs, you can give them the benefit of the doubt, and let your dogs play. If it turns out to be poorly raised, poorly bred, or whatever, then usually the worst that's going to happen is a little scuffle that you have to break up, and you move on.

With pit bulls, if you are wrong, and the dog turns out to be poorly raised, and have bloodlines with fighting stock, then that dog is immediately going to try to kill your dog, end of story. He's going straight for the throat, and isn't going to stop until your dog stops breathing or something stops him from breathing.

All I'm really saying is that, unfortunately, it doesn't pay to give pits the benefit of the doubt, in terms of safety.

Just imagine what would have happened if Metzger hadn't been a healthy, tough, 115-pound dog? If John had attacked Baby the way he did my dog, then he would have had a very good chance of killing her.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Nightshade wrote:Glad you're dog's ok, and I can say with all honesty that if ti was Moose he went after, that pit would have been dead. Period.
I read the rest of your post and addressed some of it above.

But I just wanted to say that it so happened that we were doing some target practice that afternoon while we were there. There was a 22-long revolver, an SKS, a glock 40 and an H&K 45 tactical all within about 20 feet of me.

For about half a second, the thought crossed my mind. But the damage done was minimal after all was said and done. The fact that he obviously wanted to kill my dog made me want to pick up that H&K and turn his head into a canoe with a hollow point. But I already completely beat the shit out of my buddy's dog, and he saw what kind of problem he has on his hands.

The ball's in his court to do something about it. I'm not going to shoot my friend's dog. But I sure hope he's smart enough to act on this kind of warning, before he winds up in a serious lawsuit and somebody or somebody's dog gets seriously injured.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:Damn rook, i am sorry to hear that..


Your dog's behavour sounds alot like my Dog. She is a Husky, White Sheppard, Wolf Mix and by far she is the best dog ever.

we've never had to put her through any training at all, she wants nothing more then to be around us and she dosent Stray off even if there is another dog Edging her on.

i hope your dog is ok though man :)
thanks amidah :icon14:
horton wrote:I have friends with pit bulls, staffordshire bull terriers etc and I think they are great dogs.

however, they are great with humans, and they have the history of being bred to fight other dogs..not go to for the random bites like most dogs, not even to hold on, but to hold and shake/rip/kill other dogs.

I love them to death, but I would always be aware of what they were bred for, for 100s of years.

I would love one, and if I had one, I would keep it away from other dogs, pitbulls belong with humans, not with other dogs.
Not to mention exercising the hell out of it and lots of time training. They have a lot of energy. ;)
blood.angel
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2000 7:00 am

Post by blood.angel »

But they are great to play red rocket with.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

i look forward to reading your post (gotta go cook right now) but in mean time i'll leave u with a good read:

http://www.gladwell.com/2006/2006_02_06_a_pitbull.html

an excerpt:
Then which are the pit bulls that get into trouble? "The ones that the legislation is geared toward have aggressive tendencies that are either bred in by the breeder, trained in by the trainer, or reinforced in by the owner," Herkstroeter says. A mean pit bull is a dog that has been turned mean, by selective breeding, by being cross-bred with a bigger, human-aggressive breed like German shepherds or Rottweilers, or by being conditioned in such a way that it begins to express hostility to human beings. A pit bull is dangerous to people, then, not to the extent that it expresses its essential pit bullness but to the extent that it deviates from it. A pit-bull ban is a generalization about a generalization about a trait that is not, in fact, general. That's a category problem.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Thanks for the link Jules, but I'm a little wary of someone's judgment who claims rottweilers and german shepherds are naturally "human-aggressive."

It sounds like he is making generalizations that are at least as big as the one he is trying to combat.

Does he justify such statements in the article at all?

edit: btw my experience wasn't about human aggression
CaseDogg
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 8:00 am

Post by CaseDogg »

damn thas fucked up! poor dog. yeah it sound like that dog needs to be whispered. sorry about your dog. hope hes ok.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

R00k wrote:Thanks for the link Jules, but I'm a little wary of someone's judgment who claims rottweilers and german shepherds are naturally "human-aggressive."

It sounds like he is making generalizations that are at least as big as the one he is trying to combat.

Does he justify such statements in the article at all?

edit: btw my experience wasn't about human aggression
haven't read that article in a while, so can't remember, but here's another quote:
Does the notion of a pit-bull menace rest on a stable or an unstable generalization? The best data we have on breed dangerousness are fatal dog bites, which serve as a useful indicator of just how much havoc certain kinds of dogs are causing. Between the late nineteen-seventies and the late nineteen-nineties, more than twenty-five breeds were involved in fatal attacks in the United States. Pit-bull breeds led the pack, but the variability from year to year is considerable. For instance, in the period from 1981 to 1982 fatalities were caused by five pit bulls, three mixed breeds, two St. Bernards, two German-shepherd mixes, a pure-bred German shepherd, a husky type, a Doberman, a Chow Chow, a Great Dane, a wolf-dog hybrid, a husky mix, and a pit-bull mix—but no Rottweilers. In 1995 and 1996, the list included ten Rottweilers, four pit bulls, two German shepherds, two huskies, two Chow Chows, two wolf-dog hybrids, two shepherd mixes, a Rottweiler mix, a mixed breed, a Chow Chow mix, and a Great Dane. The kinds of dogs that kill people change over time, because the popularity of certain breeds changes over time. The one thing that doesn't change is the total number of the people killed by dogs. When we have more problems with pit bulls, it's not necessarily a sign that pit bulls are more dangerous than other dogs. It could just be a sign that pit bulls have become more numerous.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Okay, the organization he's quoting before that regarding temperament testing (the ATTS) shows American Pit Bull Terriers scoring 84.1% passing, with Rottweilers scoring 82.7% passing, and German Shepherds scoring 83.3% passing.

He makes the deduction that pit bulls are a victim of generalization, but Rottweilers and German Shepherds are for some reason "human-aggressive" dogs. That isn't supported by anything in the article as far as I can tell.

Either way, the article doesn't have much bearing on my post, because I'm not talking about human-aggression or calling for bans, or even arguing that pit bulls are more likely to be aggressive than other dogs.

What I am arguing, is that when pit bulls are aggressive, the breed-specific tendencies in many of them can be fatal to other dogs if you give them the benefit of the doubt.

A couple of things in your article actually support that statement:
Pit bulls, descendants of the bulldogs used in the nineteenth century for bull baiting and dogfighting, have been bred for "gameness," and thus a lowered inhibition to aggression. Most dogs fight as a last resort, when staring and growling fail. A pit bull is willing to fight with little or no provocation. Pit bulls seem to have a high tolerance for pain, making it possible for them to fight to the point of exhaustion. Whereas guard dogs like German shepherds usually attempt to restrain those they perceive to be threats by biting and holding, pit bulls try to inflict the maximum amount of damage on an opponent. They bite, hold, shake, and tear. They don't growl or assume an aggressive facial expression as warning. They just attack. "They are often insensitive to behaviors that usually stop aggression," one scientific review of the breed states. "For example, dogs not bred for fighting usually display defeat in combat by rolling over and exposing a light underside. On several occasions, pit bulls have been reported to disembowel dogs offering this signal of submission."
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

good catch about german shepherd & rottweiliers - maybe coz those two breeds are easier to categorize than pit bulls? - and yea didn't mean to derail ur thread - just saw something about opinion on pit bulls and wanted to share :p
Pooinyourmouth
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Pooinyourmouth »

Well as a pit bull owner myself I would not let that john dog anywhere near my two. That dog was not raised right in my opinion. I think the owner never gave him proper discipline, and never got him with other dogs early on as a puppy. My 2 pit bulls are 8 and 9 years old now, both males, and have been around other dogs, cats, and kids and have not made a single mistake yet.


They have squabbled with each other from time to time, but it was more like two kids having an argument than some "to the death" brawl. I've seen plenty of breeds have that moment. My younger one would have been like your rot in the same position. He is a very laid back dog, and would rather tuck tail and run than fight. My other one would try and hold his own though, (and might win against john) but I'd never let that happen. He knows that as well, and I made damn sure of that. My only real problem would be that I would have the same reaction as you and I would have more than likely snuffed that other pit's life with my bare hands.

I have had my dogs come under attack by a mix breed pit/rot named Sherman. He grabbed the side of my older one's ribs and began to twist. I grabbed that dog and dropped him on his head out of shear instinct. I think I almost broke it's neck. I felt kind of bad after it was said and done, but the owner of that dog said he never attacked another dog again. The owner was not capable of much since he has been in a wheel chair most of his life.

By the way you can see how well my two boys get along:
[img]http://poop_in_pants.homestead.com/files/Dogskss.jpg[/img]
Pooinyourmouth
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Pooinyourmouth »

Oh and one more note. No one should own a dog unless they are capable and responsible enough to have a child. Even then, some people that have children are not capable of raising a dog.

They all need time and one on one training everyday for at least the first 2 years of life. If you can't do that or aren't capable then you have no business owning a dog.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

fucking horrid dogs
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

Incorrect.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

nasty shitty fucking things. no use to anyone, ever. they should all be put the fuck down. in fact, i'll fucking do it if you like.
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

You seem upset.
Post Reply